Prenatal allostatic load and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2026-09-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.21756
Mengjie Zhao, Hanyue Zheng, Dengyan Qi, Xuening Zhang, Lei Ba, Bei Wang, Xiang Hong
{"title":"Prenatal allostatic load and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mengjie Zhao, Hanyue Zheng, Dengyan Qi, Xuening Zhang, Lei Ba, Bei Wang, Xiang Hong","doi":"10.7717/peerj.21756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allostatic load (AL) denotes the cumulative physiological dysregulation resulting from chronic stress exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between prenatal AL and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), and to synthesize current evidence to inform prenatal health strategies and potentially reduce the incidence of APOs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP China Science and Technology Journal Database, and SinoMed databases for relevant studies examining prenatal AL and APOs published from September 1993 to 22 June 2026. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.3). The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251076952).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight original studies involving 8,795 pregnant women were included. High prenatal AL was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR = 1.29, 95% CI [1.04-1.60]) and preeclampsia (OR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.42-3.76]). There was no statistically significant association with low birth weight (OR = 1.10, 95% CI [0.95-1.26]). Furthermore, exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that the gestational period and biomarker composition may influence these associations; however, high methodological heterogeneity limits direct clinical application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated prenatal AL is associated with an increased risk of specific APOs, particularly preterm birth and preeclampsia. Future studies should adopt longitudinal designs with repeated AL measurements across pregnancy to clarify temporal dynamics and elucidate underlying biological mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"14 ","pages":"e21756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allostatic load (AL) denotes the cumulative physiological dysregulation resulting from chronic stress exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between prenatal AL and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), and to synthesize current evidence to inform prenatal health strategies and potentially reduce the incidence of APOs.

Methodology: This study systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP China Science and Technology Journal Database, and SinoMed databases for relevant studies examining prenatal AL and APOs published from September 1993 to 22 June 2026. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.3). The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251076952).

Results: Eight original studies involving 8,795 pregnant women were included. High prenatal AL was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR = 1.29, 95% CI [1.04-1.60]) and preeclampsia (OR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.42-3.76]). There was no statistically significant association with low birth weight (OR = 1.10, 95% CI [0.95-1.26]). Furthermore, exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that the gestational period and biomarker composition may influence these associations; however, high methodological heterogeneity limits direct clinical application.

Conclusions: Elevated prenatal AL is associated with an increased risk of specific APOs, particularly preterm birth and preeclampsia. Future studies should adopt longitudinal designs with repeated AL measurements across pregnancy to clarify temporal dynamics and elucidate underlying biological mechanisms.

产前适应负荷和不良妊娠结局:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:适应负荷(Allostatic load, AL)是指慢性应激暴露导致的累积生理失调。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估产前AL与不良妊娠结局(APOs)之间的关系,并综合现有证据,为产前保健策略提供信息,并有可能降低APOs的发生率。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、PsycINFO、中国知识基础设施、万方、VIP中国科技期刊库和中国医学信息数据库,检索1993年9月至2026年6月22日发表的产前AL和apo相关研究。两名研究人员独立筛选文献,提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。采用R软件(4.4.3版)进行meta分析。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251076952)。结果:纳入了8项原始研究,涉及8795名孕妇。高产前AL与早产(OR = 1.29, 95% CI[1.04-1.60])和先兆子痫(OR = 2.31, 95% CI[1.42-3.76])的风险增加相关。与低出生体重无统计学意义的关联(OR = 1.10, 95% CI[0.95-1.26])。此外,探索性亚组分析表明,妊娠期和生物标志物组成可能影响这些关联;然而,方法的高度异质性限制了直接临床应用。结论:产前AL升高与特定apo的风险增加有关,特别是早产和先兆子痫。未来的研究应采用纵向设计,在整个妊娠期间重复AL测量,以阐明时间动态和潜在的生物学机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书