Kiyoshi Tai, Mo Hyeon Lee, Seiji Lida, Kazuki Nakatsuji, Ayumi Okada, Jae Hyun Park
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Facial Soft Tissue Response to Premolar Extraction: Influence of Vertical Skeletal Change Analysed Using Geometric Morphometrics.","authors":"Kiyoshi Tai, Mo Hyeon Lee, Seiji Lida, Kazuki Nakatsuji, Ayumi Okada, Jae Hyun Park","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissue response to premolar extraction remains unclear, particularly in relation to vertical skeletal changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three adult women who underwent orthodontic treatment with the extraction of four premolars were included. Homologous facial models were generated from facial soft-tissue surface data derived from CBCT images acquired before and after treatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to characterise variation in facial form using homologous model coordinates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate components nominally associated with pre- and post-treatment configurations within each vertical skeletal subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each vertical skeletal subgroup included 11 subjects. In the decreased-FMA group, PC5 showed the largest nominal AUC (0.79), followed by PC3 and PC11 (both 0.75), with morphological variation concentrated in the lower facial region. In the increased-FMA group, PC7 and PC12 showed nominal AUCs of 0.76 and 0.73, respectively, and were associated with lateral facial narrowing and facial slimming. No meaningful nominal discrimination was identified in the stable-FMA group. These findings indicated distinct group-level morphological tendencies depending on the direction of vertical skeletal change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-dimensional facial soft-tissue changes following premolar extraction showed group-level patterns that appeared to vary according to the direction of vertical skeletal change. Patients with decreased FMA tended to show lower facialreorganisation, whereas patients with increased FMA tended to show lateral facial narrowing and facial slimming. Given the modest subgroup size and multiple nominal ROC comparisons, these findings warrant confirmation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissue response to premolar extraction remains unclear, particularly in relation to vertical skeletal changes.
Methods: Thirty-three adult women who underwent orthodontic treatment with the extraction of four premolars were included. Homologous facial models were generated from facial soft-tissue surface data derived from CBCT images acquired before and after treatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to characterise variation in facial form using homologous model coordinates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate components nominally associated with pre- and post-treatment configurations within each vertical skeletal subgroup.
Results: Each vertical skeletal subgroup included 11 subjects. In the decreased-FMA group, PC5 showed the largest nominal AUC (0.79), followed by PC3 and PC11 (both 0.75), with morphological variation concentrated in the lower facial region. In the increased-FMA group, PC7 and PC12 showed nominal AUCs of 0.76 and 0.73, respectively, and were associated with lateral facial narrowing and facial slimming. No meaningful nominal discrimination was identified in the stable-FMA group. These findings indicated distinct group-level morphological tendencies depending on the direction of vertical skeletal change.
Conclusions: Three-dimensional facial soft-tissue changes following premolar extraction showed group-level patterns that appeared to vary according to the direction of vertical skeletal change. Patients with decreased FMA tended to show lower facialreorganisation, whereas patients with increased FMA tended to show lateral facial narrowing and facial slimming. Given the modest subgroup size and multiple nominal ROC comparisons, these findings warrant confirmation in larger cohorts.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.