[A transition from targeting immune evasion to a multidisciplinary collaborative treatment framework for "homotherapy for heteropathy" in liver metastases].

Q3 Medicine
Q Zhang, N Zhang, Y Y Lu
{"title":"[A transition from targeting immune evasion to a multidisciplinary collaborative treatment framework for \"homotherapy for heteropathy\" in liver metastases].","authors":"Q Zhang, N Zhang, Y Y Lu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20260601-00224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver metastasis is a common and challenging clinical problem in the progression of various solid tumors. The current diagnostic and therapeutic scheme is primarily formulated according to the pathological classification and molecular stratification of the primary tumor. However, once tumors of different origins metastasize to the liver, they may face common challenges such as limited benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors, inadequate and unsustained disease control with systemic therapy, and recurrence following local treatment. The liver's immunologically tolerogenic background, together with impaired antigen presentation, restricted effector immune responses, myeloid-mediated immunosuppression, abnormal vasculature, stromal remodeling, and metabolic competition, may contribute to organ-specific therapeutic resistance that is shared across different cancer types after hepatic metastasis. Based on a review of relevant mechanisms, clinical evidence, and limitations of existing treatment paradigms, a clinical decision-making framework for \"homotherapy for heteropathy\" in liver metastases is proposed. Systemic therapies-including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy-are integrated with local therapies, including surgery, ablation, interventional therapy, and radiotherapy, together with supportive care to address potentially shared organ-specific therapeutic resistance following liver metastasis in line with standardized classification and treatment of the primary tumor. Treatment is dynamically adjusted according to disease status and treatment response, with the integration and implementation of systemic and local therapies, therapeutic goals, and treatment sequencing. This framework is primarily applicable to patients with resectable or amenable-to-ablation oligometastatic disease, initially unresectable disease with the potential for conversion to resectability, liver-dominant disease with stable extrahepatic disease, and patients with limited residual intrahepatic disease or oligoprogression following systemic therapy. Clinical applications should still consider the biological characteristics of the primary cancer, the status of liver and extrahepatic disease, prior treatment responses, liver function reserve, and the available evidence base. The \"homotherapy for heteropathy\" framework uses shared organ-specific therapeutic resistance as an entry point-based on cancer-specific treatments-to facilitate patient stratification, multidisciplinary collaboration, and the optimization of treatment sequencing. In the future, domestic multicenter prospective studies and real-world cohorts will be needed to further clarify the suitable patient population, treatment timing, and biomarkers of benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":24006,"journal":{"name":"中华肝脏病杂志","volume":"34 9","pages":"817-827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝脏病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20260601-00224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver metastasis is a common and challenging clinical problem in the progression of various solid tumors. The current diagnostic and therapeutic scheme is primarily formulated according to the pathological classification and molecular stratification of the primary tumor. However, once tumors of different origins metastasize to the liver, they may face common challenges such as limited benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors, inadequate and unsustained disease control with systemic therapy, and recurrence following local treatment. The liver's immunologically tolerogenic background, together with impaired antigen presentation, restricted effector immune responses, myeloid-mediated immunosuppression, abnormal vasculature, stromal remodeling, and metabolic competition, may contribute to organ-specific therapeutic resistance that is shared across different cancer types after hepatic metastasis. Based on a review of relevant mechanisms, clinical evidence, and limitations of existing treatment paradigms, a clinical decision-making framework for "homotherapy for heteropathy" in liver metastases is proposed. Systemic therapies-including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy-are integrated with local therapies, including surgery, ablation, interventional therapy, and radiotherapy, together with supportive care to address potentially shared organ-specific therapeutic resistance following liver metastasis in line with standardized classification and treatment of the primary tumor. Treatment is dynamically adjusted according to disease status and treatment response, with the integration and implementation of systemic and local therapies, therapeutic goals, and treatment sequencing. This framework is primarily applicable to patients with resectable or amenable-to-ablation oligometastatic disease, initially unresectable disease with the potential for conversion to resectability, liver-dominant disease with stable extrahepatic disease, and patients with limited residual intrahepatic disease or oligoprogression following systemic therapy. Clinical applications should still consider the biological characteristics of the primary cancer, the status of liver and extrahepatic disease, prior treatment responses, liver function reserve, and the available evidence base. The "homotherapy for heteropathy" framework uses shared organ-specific therapeutic resistance as an entry point-based on cancer-specific treatments-to facilitate patient stratification, multidisciplinary collaboration, and the optimization of treatment sequencing. In the future, domestic multicenter prospective studies and real-world cohorts will be needed to further clarify the suitable patient population, treatment timing, and biomarkers of benefit.

[从靶向免疫逃避到肝转移“同种疗法治疗异病”的多学科合作治疗框架的转变]。
肝转移是各种实体瘤发展过程中常见且具有挑战性的临床问题。目前的诊断和治疗方案主要是根据原发肿瘤的病理分类和分子分层制定的。然而,一旦不同来源的肿瘤转移到肝脏,它们可能面临共同的挑战,如免疫检查点抑制剂的益处有限,全身治疗的疾病控制不充分和不持续,局部治疗后复发。肝脏的免疫耐受背景,加上抗原呈递受损、效应免疫反应受限、髓细胞介导的免疫抑制、血管异常、基质重塑和代谢竞争,可能导致肝转移后不同类型癌症共有的器官特异性治疗耐药。在回顾相关机制、临床证据和现有治疗模式局限性的基础上,提出了肝转移“同种疗法治疗异源性”的临床决策框架。全身治疗——包括化疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗——与局部治疗(包括手术、消融、介入治疗和放疗)以及支持治疗相结合,以解决肝转移后可能共享的器官特异性治疗耐药性,符合原发肿瘤的标准化分类和治疗。根据疾病状态和治疗反应动态调整治疗方案,统筹实施全身和局部治疗、治疗目标、治疗顺序。该框架主要适用于可切除或可消融的少转移性疾病、最初不可切除但有可能转变为可切除的疾病、肝脏显性疾病伴稳定的肝外疾病、以及全身治疗后肝内疾病残留有限或少进展的患者。临床应用仍应考虑原发肿瘤的生物学特征、肝脏和肝外疾病的状况、既往治疗反应、肝功能储备以及现有的证据基础。“同种疗法治疗异病”框架以共享的器官特异性治疗耐药为切入点,以癌症特异性治疗为基础,促进患者分层、多学科合作和治疗序列优化。未来,需要国内多中心前瞻性研究和现实世界队列研究来进一步明确合适的患者人群、治疗时间和获益的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华肝脏病杂志
中华肝脏病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7574
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书