Gender Inequities in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Workforce: A Narrative Review

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tuangsit Wataganara, Eiko Yamamoto, Somsook Santibenchakul, Ninlapa Pruksanusak, Jitti Hanprasertpong, Suthee Panichkul, Supitchaya Surasereewong
{"title":"Gender Inequities in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Workforce: A Narrative Review","authors":"Tuangsit Wataganara,&nbsp;Eiko Yamamoto,&nbsp;Somsook Santibenchakul,&nbsp;Ninlapa Pruksanusak,&nbsp;Jitti Hanprasertpong,&nbsp;Suthee Panichkul,&nbsp;Supitchaya Surasereewong","doi":"10.1111/jog.70514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Obstetricians and gynecologists (OBGYNs) are high-risk, surgically intensive, and emergency-driven specialists. Women are the majority of OBGYNs, but their representation in decision-making roles remains disproportionately low. This narrative review explores the empirical evidence and aims to narrow gender gaps among OBGYNs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included 154 publications from 2000 to 2025 on gender inequity, career progression, women physicians, OBGYNs, academic promotion, leadership, workforce, and regional variation from Asia, Europe, North America, Africa, South America, and the Caribbean. Eligible studies either (1) focused on OBGYNs or female surgeons, (2) reported gender disparities in academic, administrative, or service domains, or (3) provided regional data. Qualitative and quantitative studies, policy reports, and professional society publications were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were insufficient data from South America and the Caribbean. For the other regions, we identified cultures, societal norms, and the structures of health systems as contributors to gender barriers in OBGYNs. These barriers are not at the entry levels, but rather in career ascension. In high-income countries, implicit biases persist despite established work-life policies and legislative protections. In low and middle-income countries, disparities are shaped by sociocultural expectations, fewer institutional supports, and rigid hierarchical structures. Men also face distinct barriers, such as limited patient acceptance and unequal distribution of out-of-hours duties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is an urgent need to acquire high-quality data on stereotypic biases, structural, and cultural barriers to gender inequities among OBGYNs. Without timely intervention, gender gaps within the OBGYN workforce will likely be widened over time.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Obstetricians and gynecologists (OBGYNs) are high-risk, surgically intensive, and emergency-driven specialists. Women are the majority of OBGYNs, but their representation in decision-making roles remains disproportionately low. This narrative review explores the empirical evidence and aims to narrow gender gaps among OBGYNs.

Methods

We included 154 publications from 2000 to 2025 on gender inequity, career progression, women physicians, OBGYNs, academic promotion, leadership, workforce, and regional variation from Asia, Europe, North America, Africa, South America, and the Caribbean. Eligible studies either (1) focused on OBGYNs or female surgeons, (2) reported gender disparities in academic, administrative, or service domains, or (3) provided regional data. Qualitative and quantitative studies, policy reports, and professional society publications were included.

Results

There were insufficient data from South America and the Caribbean. For the other regions, we identified cultures, societal norms, and the structures of health systems as contributors to gender barriers in OBGYNs. These barriers are not at the entry levels, but rather in career ascension. In high-income countries, implicit biases persist despite established work-life policies and legislative protections. In low and middle-income countries, disparities are shaped by sociocultural expectations, fewer institutional supports, and rigid hierarchical structures. Men also face distinct barriers, such as limited patient acceptance and unequal distribution of out-of-hours duties.

Conclusions

There is an urgent need to acquire high-quality data on stereotypic biases, structural, and cultural barriers to gender inequities among OBGYNs. Without timely intervention, gender gaps within the OBGYN workforce will likely be widened over time.

妇产科劳动力中的性别不平等:叙述回顾。
目的:产科医生和妇科医生(OBGYNs)是高风险,手术密集和紧急驱动的专家。妇女在妇产科医生中占多数,但她们在决策角色中的代表性仍然低得不成比例。这篇叙述性综述探讨了经验证据,旨在缩小妇产科医生之间的性别差距。方法:我们纳入了2000年至2025年间154篇关于性别不平等、职业发展、女医生、妇产科医生、学术晋升、领导力、劳动力以及亚洲、欧洲、北美、非洲、南美和加勒比地区差异的出版物。符合条件的研究:(1)关注妇产科医生或女外科医生,(2)报告学术、行政或服务领域的性别差异,或(3)提供地区数据。包括定性和定量研究、政策报告和专业协会出版物。结果:来自南美和加勒比地区的资料不足。对于其他地区,我们确定了造成妇产科性别障碍的文化、社会规范和卫生系统结构。这些障碍不是在入门级,而是在职业提升中。在高收入国家,尽管有既定的工作-生活政策和立法保护,隐性偏见仍然存在。在低收入和中等收入国家,差异是由社会文化期望、较少的制度支持和僵化的等级结构造成的。男性也面临着明显的障碍,比如病人接受程度有限,非工作时间职责分配不均。结论:迫切需要获得关于妇产科中性别不平等的刻板偏见、结构和文化障碍的高质量数据。如果不及时干预,妇产科工作人员中的性别差距可能会随着时间的推移而扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书