Prediction or explanation: a clinician's guide to logistic regression.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Junyong In, Dong Kyu Lee
{"title":"Prediction or explanation: a clinician's guide to logistic regression.","authors":"Junyong In, Dong Kyu Lee","doi":"10.4097/kja.26348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Logistic regression is a statistical method used for exploratory and predictive purposes in clinical research. While it is widely used, logistic regression results reported across studies have been inconsistent, particularly in terms of model estimation, validation, and interpretation, even though most studies have clarified their analytical purposes. Reports frequently do not adequately describe how the logistic regression models were evaluated in a purpose-specific manner, particularly regarding underlying assumptions, diagnostic procedures, and performance assessments. Therefore, the interpretability, reproducibility, and clinical applicability of the results presented are frequently limited. We reviewed papers published in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology (KJA) between 2021 and 2024 that used logistic regression and examined reporting practices, focusing on whether the model evaluation was consistent with the stated analytical purpose. Based on our findings, we then outline the core assumptions required for the appropriate use of logistic regression and introduce key diagnostic tools with practical guidance on their application according to analytical purposes. We also describe statistically robust approaches for reporting the results of logistic regression analyses used for exploratory and predictive purposes, as well as study designs that intentionally incorporate both these aims. With this article, we hope to help researchers establish clear analytical objectives and to adopt systematic reporting practices when using logistic regression, thereby strengthening the basis for research findings to serve as scientifically credible evidence for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.26348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logistic regression is a statistical method used for exploratory and predictive purposes in clinical research. While it is widely used, logistic regression results reported across studies have been inconsistent, particularly in terms of model estimation, validation, and interpretation, even though most studies have clarified their analytical purposes. Reports frequently do not adequately describe how the logistic regression models were evaluated in a purpose-specific manner, particularly regarding underlying assumptions, diagnostic procedures, and performance assessments. Therefore, the interpretability, reproducibility, and clinical applicability of the results presented are frequently limited. We reviewed papers published in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology (KJA) between 2021 and 2024 that used logistic regression and examined reporting practices, focusing on whether the model evaluation was consistent with the stated analytical purpose. Based on our findings, we then outline the core assumptions required for the appropriate use of logistic regression and introduce key diagnostic tools with practical guidance on their application according to analytical purposes. We also describe statistically robust approaches for reporting the results of logistic regression analyses used for exploratory and predictive purposes, as well as study designs that intentionally incorporate both these aims. With this article, we hope to help researchers establish clear analytical objectives and to adopt systematic reporting practices when using logistic regression, thereby strengthening the basis for research findings to serve as scientifically credible evidence for clinical decision-making.

预测或解释:临床医生的逻辑回归指南。
逻辑回归是一种在临床研究中用于探索性和预测性目的的统计方法。虽然它被广泛使用,但不同研究报告的逻辑回归结果并不一致,特别是在模型估计、验证和解释方面,尽管大多数研究已经阐明了它们的分析目的。报告经常没有充分描述逻辑回归模型是如何以特定目的的方式进行评估的,特别是关于潜在的假设、诊断程序和绩效评估。因此,结果的可解释性、可重复性和临床适用性经常受到限制。我们回顾了2021年至2024年间发表在韩国麻醉学杂志(KJA)上的论文,这些论文使用逻辑回归并检查了报告实践,重点关注模型评估是否与所述分析目的一致。根据我们的发现,我们然后概述了适当使用逻辑回归所需的核心假设,并根据分析目的介绍了关键诊断工具及其应用的实际指导。我们还描述了用于探索性和预测性目的的逻辑回归分析结果报告的统计稳健方法,以及有意结合这两个目标的研究设计。通过本文,我们希望帮助研究者在使用逻辑回归时建立明确的分析目标,并采用系统的报告实践,从而加强研究结果的基础,为临床决策提供科学可信的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书