Recurrent multiterritorial ischemic stroke with persistent moderate hypereosinophilia: A case report with focused literature review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1177/03000605261491519
Yu Wang, Na Liu, Ju Zhu
{"title":"Recurrent multiterritorial ischemic stroke with persistent moderate hypereosinophilia: A case report with focused literature review.","authors":"Yu Wang, Na Liu, Ju Zhu","doi":"10.1177/03000605261491519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent hypereosinophilia may be overlooked during stroke evaluation when conventional vascular risks coexist. We report the case of a man in his late 50s who had hypertension, type 2 diabetes, continued active smoking, and eight clinically apparent magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed strokes in multiple bilateral territories over 29 months. Before systemic glucocorticoid exposure, absolute eosinophil counts ranged from 1.87 to 3.23 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L on repeated measurements. Bone marrow morphology and flow cytometry revealed eosinophil expansion without aberrancy, and common tested clonal drivers were negative. Transthoracic echocardiography, two 24-h Holter recordings, and a bubble study identified no intracardiac source. Aortic computed tomography angiography in April 2026 demonstrated thoracic aortic atherosclerosis with calcified plaques and focal ulceration; transesophageal echocardiography and prolonged rhythm monitoring were not performed. A new left pontine infarct occurred in April 2026 while he was on oral prednisone (20 mg/day). In August 2026, after systemic glucocorticoid withdrawal despite continued inhaled budesonide/formoterol, a new right temporal infarct occurred, with an absolute eosinophil count of 2.66 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L. Worsening wheeze suggested possible eosinophilic airway inflammation; however, emphysema alone did not explain systemic eosinophilia, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis remained unproven. The available evidence favored a multifactorial interpretation; eosinophilia provides biological plausibility, whereas conventional vascular risks and an incompletely characterized thoracic aortic abnormality remain competing explanations. Persistent eosinophilia should prompt repeated etiological reassessment without inferring causality based on blood count or imaging pattern alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"54 9","pages":"3000605261491519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605261491519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent hypereosinophilia may be overlooked during stroke evaluation when conventional vascular risks coexist. We report the case of a man in his late 50s who had hypertension, type 2 diabetes, continued active smoking, and eight clinically apparent magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed strokes in multiple bilateral territories over 29 months. Before systemic glucocorticoid exposure, absolute eosinophil counts ranged from 1.87 to 3.23 × 109/L on repeated measurements. Bone marrow morphology and flow cytometry revealed eosinophil expansion without aberrancy, and common tested clonal drivers were negative. Transthoracic echocardiography, two 24-h Holter recordings, and a bubble study identified no intracardiac source. Aortic computed tomography angiography in April 2026 demonstrated thoracic aortic atherosclerosis with calcified plaques and focal ulceration; transesophageal echocardiography and prolonged rhythm monitoring were not performed. A new left pontine infarct occurred in April 2026 while he was on oral prednisone (20 mg/day). In August 2026, after systemic glucocorticoid withdrawal despite continued inhaled budesonide/formoterol, a new right temporal infarct occurred, with an absolute eosinophil count of 2.66 × 109/L. Worsening wheeze suggested possible eosinophilic airway inflammation; however, emphysema alone did not explain systemic eosinophilia, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis remained unproven. The available evidence favored a multifactorial interpretation; eosinophilia provides biological plausibility, whereas conventional vascular risks and an incompletely characterized thoracic aortic abnormality remain competing explanations. Persistent eosinophilia should prompt repeated etiological reassessment without inferring causality based on blood count or imaging pattern alone.

复发性多区域缺血性脑卒中伴持续性中度嗜酸性粒细胞增多:1例报告并重点文献复习。
在卒中评估中,当常规血管风险共存时,持续性嗜酸性粒细胞增多可能被忽视。我们报告一例50多岁的男性患者,他患有高血压、2型糖尿病、持续吸烟,在29个月的时间里,在多个双侧领土上有8次临床明显的磁共振成像证实的中风。在全身糖皮质激素暴露前,重复测量嗜酸性粒细胞绝对计数为1.87 ~ 3.23 × 109/L。骨髓形态和流式细胞术显示嗜酸性粒细胞扩增,未见异常,常用克隆驱动因子均为阴性。经胸超声心动图、两次24小时动态心电图记录和气泡研究均未发现心内源。2026年4月主动脉ct血管造影显示胸主动脉粥样硬化伴钙化斑块和局灶性溃疡;未进行经食管超声心动图和延长心律监测。2026年4月,当他口服强的松(20mg /天)时,发生了新的左脑桥梗死。2026年8月,尽管继续吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗,但全身停用糖皮质激素后,发生了新的右侧颞叶梗死,绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数为2.66 × 109/L。喘鸣加重提示可能存在嗜酸性气道炎症;然而,单独的肺气肿并不能解释系统性嗜酸性粒细胞增多,嗜酸性粒细胞肉芽肿合并多血管炎仍未得到证实。现有证据支持多因素解释;嗜酸性粒细胞增多提供了生物学上的合理性,而传统的血管风险和不完全特征的胸主动脉异常仍然是相互竞争的解释。持续性嗜酸性粒细胞增多应提示反复的病因重新评估,而不能仅根据血细胞计数或影像学模式推断因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书