The importance of reporting notifiable infectious diseases - the Swiss reporting system.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2026-09-25 DOI:10.57187/5508
Michelle Raess, Annora Celant, Mirjam Mäusezahl
{"title":"The importance of reporting notifiable infectious diseases - the Swiss reporting system.","authors":"Michelle Raess, Annora Celant, Mirjam Mäusezahl","doi":"10.57187/5508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The structured processes of clinical medicine and epidemiology are closely aligned, with disease reporting serving as the critical interface between individual patient care and population-level public health action. In Switzerland, mandatory reporting of communicable diseases forms the backbone of national infectious disease surveillance and relies on coordinated contributions from clinicians and laboratories. The Swiss reporting system is regulated by an ordinance that defines notifiable diseases, reporting criteria and strict timelines. It encompasses severe diseases, outbreak-prone infections, and endemic or vaccine-preventable conditions, and is continuously updated to reflect evolving epidemiological threats. Accurate case classification depends on the integration of both clinical and laboratory data; incomplete reporting compromises data quality and can lead to misclassification and biased epidemiological conclusions. In recent years, reporting compliance - particularly for clinical notifications - has declined significantly. This deterioration in data completeness limits the ability to detect outbreaks, assess trends and implement timely and targeted public health interventions. Contributing factors include administrative burden, limited awareness of reporting obligations and insufficient understanding of the public health value of reporting. High-quality reporting is essential for multiple public health functions: enabling rapid containment measures such as contact tracing and isolation, supporting outbreak detection through statistical surveillance and genomic analysis, informing national health policies and vaccination strategies, and facilitating research. Surveillance data are routinely analysed and disseminated via national dashboards and international collaborations. In conclusion, although reporting imposes additional demands on clinicians, it remains a fundamental component of effective public health practice. Strengthening reporting compliance and data quality is critical to ensuring timely interventions, reducing disease burden and maintaining resilient health systems. Improved digital solutions may alleviate reporting burdens; however, sustained clinician engagement and recognition of their role in public health are indispensable.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"5508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/5508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The structured processes of clinical medicine and epidemiology are closely aligned, with disease reporting serving as the critical interface between individual patient care and population-level public health action. In Switzerland, mandatory reporting of communicable diseases forms the backbone of national infectious disease surveillance and relies on coordinated contributions from clinicians and laboratories. The Swiss reporting system is regulated by an ordinance that defines notifiable diseases, reporting criteria and strict timelines. It encompasses severe diseases, outbreak-prone infections, and endemic or vaccine-preventable conditions, and is continuously updated to reflect evolving epidemiological threats. Accurate case classification depends on the integration of both clinical and laboratory data; incomplete reporting compromises data quality and can lead to misclassification and biased epidemiological conclusions. In recent years, reporting compliance - particularly for clinical notifications - has declined significantly. This deterioration in data completeness limits the ability to detect outbreaks, assess trends and implement timely and targeted public health interventions. Contributing factors include administrative burden, limited awareness of reporting obligations and insufficient understanding of the public health value of reporting. High-quality reporting is essential for multiple public health functions: enabling rapid containment measures such as contact tracing and isolation, supporting outbreak detection through statistical surveillance and genomic analysis, informing national health policies and vaccination strategies, and facilitating research. Surveillance data are routinely analysed and disseminated via national dashboards and international collaborations. In conclusion, although reporting imposes additional demands on clinicians, it remains a fundamental component of effective public health practice. Strengthening reporting compliance and data quality is critical to ensuring timely interventions, reducing disease burden and maintaining resilient health systems. Improved digital solutions may alleviate reporting burdens; however, sustained clinician engagement and recognition of their role in public health are indispensable.

报告法定传染病的重要性——瑞士报告系统。
临床医学和流行病学的结构化过程是密切一致的,疾病报告是个体患者护理和人口层面公共卫生行动之间的关键接口。在瑞士,传染病的强制性报告构成了国家传染病监测的支柱,并依赖于临床医生和实验室的协调贡献。瑞士的报告制度受一项条例的管制,该条例规定了应通报的疾病、报告标准和严格的时间表。它包括严重疾病、容易爆发的感染以及地方病或疫苗可预防的疾病,并不断更新,以反映不断变化的流行病学威胁。准确的病例分类依赖于临床和实验室数据的整合;不完整的报告会影响数据质量,并可能导致错误分类和有偏见的流行病学结论。近年来,报告合规性——特别是临床报告——显著下降。数据完整性的这种恶化限制了发现疫情、评估趋势和及时实施有针对性的公共卫生干预措施的能力。造成这种情况的因素包括行政负担、对报告义务的认识有限以及对报告的公共卫生价值了解不足。高质量的报告对于多种公共卫生职能至关重要:实现追踪接触者和隔离等快速遏制措施,通过统计监测和基因组分析支持疫情发现,为国家卫生政策和疫苗接种战略提供信息,以及促进研究。监测数据通过国家仪表板和国际合作进行常规分析和传播。总之,尽管报告对临床医生提出了额外的要求,但它仍然是有效公共卫生实践的基本组成部分。加强报告合规性和数据质量对于确保及时干预、减轻疾病负担和维持有复原力的卫生系统至关重要。改进的数字解决方案可以减轻报告负担;然而,临床医生的持续参与和对其在公共卫生中的作用的认可是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书