Streamlining Qualitative Research: Rapid Analysis Innovations in Expanding the Crisis Care Continuum Through Community-Based Implementation Science.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Emily E Edwards, Sara A Choate, Hallie R Decker, Paige Roberson, Miley Jacola, Mads Priddy, Brian P Schaefer
{"title":"Streamlining Qualitative Research: Rapid Analysis Innovations in Expanding the Crisis Care Continuum Through Community-Based Implementation Science.","authors":"Emily E Edwards, Sara A Choate, Hallie R Decker, Paige Roberson, Miley Jacola, Mads Priddy, Brian P Schaefer","doi":"10.1007/s10900-026-01636-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qualitative research is a valuable tool for implementing community-based interventions. Rapid analysis (RA) is an applied qualitative approach benefiting community-engaged implementation research by quickly obtaining and analyzing data for actionable results, without sacrificing scientific rigor. To provide technical assistance to four Kentucky communities to strengthen behavioral health crisis response systems, an RA approach was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science (CFIR), guiding the development of interview instruments, codebook, data organization, and dissemination of findings to both the internal team and back to the community. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework was used to determine research focus for each community. Initial conversations (n = 109) were conducted to build rapport, followed by interviews and focus groups in iterative first round (n = 165), second round (n = 40), and third round (n = 95) to understand the behavioral health landscape in their communities. Through RA strategies, researchers were able to identify community's CFIR-guided themes and EPIS stages, including barriers and facilitators, to provide practical solutions for effective implementation in their contexts. Community presentations and weekly internal reports contributed to technical assistance tailored to the implementation stage. Specific RA-driven impacts included co-developing 202 A involuntary process flowcharts, analyzing 911 call narratives to improve behavioral health dispatch, and facilitating two behavioral health coalitions formation. This study found that using rapid analysis can enhance systems capacity, implementation support, and identify sustainable best practices directly informed by the community. As such, RA serves as an important innovation for implementation science, qualitative research, and building trust with community.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-026-01636-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualitative research is a valuable tool for implementing community-based interventions. Rapid analysis (RA) is an applied qualitative approach benefiting community-engaged implementation research by quickly obtaining and analyzing data for actionable results, without sacrificing scientific rigor. To provide technical assistance to four Kentucky communities to strengthen behavioral health crisis response systems, an RA approach was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science (CFIR), guiding the development of interview instruments, codebook, data organization, and dissemination of findings to both the internal team and back to the community. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework was used to determine research focus for each community. Initial conversations (n = 109) were conducted to build rapport, followed by interviews and focus groups in iterative first round (n = 165), second round (n = 40), and third round (n = 95) to understand the behavioral health landscape in their communities. Through RA strategies, researchers were able to identify community's CFIR-guided themes and EPIS stages, including barriers and facilitators, to provide practical solutions for effective implementation in their contexts. Community presentations and weekly internal reports contributed to technical assistance tailored to the implementation stage. Specific RA-driven impacts included co-developing 202 A involuntary process flowcharts, analyzing 911 call narratives to improve behavioral health dispatch, and facilitating two behavioral health coalitions formation. This study found that using rapid analysis can enhance systems capacity, implementation support, and identify sustainable best practices directly informed by the community. As such, RA serves as an important innovation for implementation science, qualitative research, and building trust with community.

精简定性研究:通过社区实施科学扩展危机护理连续体的快速分析创新。
定性研究是实施以社区为基础的干预措施的宝贵工具。快速分析(RA)是一种应用定性方法,通过快速获取和分析数据以获得可操作的结果,在不牺牲科学严谨性的情况下,有利于社区参与的实施研究。为了向四个肯塔基州社区提供技术援助,以加强行为健康危机应对系统,实施科学综合框架(CFIR)为RA方法提供了信息,指导访谈工具、代码本、数据组织的发展,并向内部团队和社区传播调查结果。探索、准备、实施和维持(EPIS)框架用于确定每个社区的研究重点。进行初步对话(n = 109)以建立融洽关系,随后在迭代的第一轮(n = 165)、第二轮(n = 40)和第三轮(n = 95)中进行访谈和焦点小组,以了解其社区的行为健康状况。通过RA策略,研究人员能够确定社区cfir引导的主题和EPIS阶段,包括障碍和促进因素,从而为在其背景下有效实施EPIS提供切实可行的解决方案。社区介绍和每周内部报告有助于提供适合执行阶段的技术援助。具体的ra驱动影响包括共同制定202 A非自愿过程流程图,分析911呼叫叙述以改善行为健康调度,并促进两个行为健康联盟的形成。本研究发现,使用快速分析可以增强系统能力,支持实施,并确定由社区直接告知的可持续最佳实践。因此,RA是实现科学、定性研究和与社区建立信任的重要创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书