Loneliness as a Benchmark Social-connection Signal for Psychological Distress: Cross-national, Longitudinal and Genetically Informed Triangulation Evidence.
{"title":"Loneliness as a Benchmark Social-connection Signal for Psychological Distress: Cross-national, Longitudinal and Genetically Informed Triangulation Evidence.","authors":"Fu Yang","doi":"10.1177/00207640261487612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is associated with psychological distress, but whether broader social measures add information is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess incremental information from broader social measures beyond loneliness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study combined cross-sectional data from European Social Survey Round 6 (ESS6; 48,377 respondents, 29 countries), prospective Health and Retirement Study (HRS) intervals, and exploratory Mendelian randomisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ESS6, loneliness had the largest survey-weighted standardised coefficient (<i>b</i> = 0.221 per SD, 95% CI [0.195, 0.246]), 4.3 times the next-largest coefficient. Adding non-loneliness social variables to covariates plus loneliness yielded little cross-validation gain (delta AUC = 0.0058, corrected [0.0004, 0.0111]), whereas adding loneliness to covariates improved AUC by 0.0739 (0.0653, 0.0825). In HRS, baseline loneliness predicted next-wave depressive symptoms after adjustment for baseline symptoms and covariates (<i>b</i> = 0.108, [0.096, 0.120]); relationship strain was the clearest adjacent signal. Exploratory MR suggested that the loneliness-depressive-symptom association may not be unidirectional, but pleiotropy, relaxed reverse instruments, sample overlap and mixed marker findings precluded directional causal interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness may serve as a benchmark indicator for population research, while broader measures primarily contextualise relational strain and social safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640261487612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640261487612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Loneliness is associated with psychological distress, but whether broader social measures add information is unclear.
Aims: To assess incremental information from broader social measures beyond loneliness.
Method: This study combined cross-sectional data from European Social Survey Round 6 (ESS6; 48,377 respondents, 29 countries), prospective Health and Retirement Study (HRS) intervals, and exploratory Mendelian randomisation.
Results: In ESS6, loneliness had the largest survey-weighted standardised coefficient (b = 0.221 per SD, 95% CI [0.195, 0.246]), 4.3 times the next-largest coefficient. Adding non-loneliness social variables to covariates plus loneliness yielded little cross-validation gain (delta AUC = 0.0058, corrected [0.0004, 0.0111]), whereas adding loneliness to covariates improved AUC by 0.0739 (0.0653, 0.0825). In HRS, baseline loneliness predicted next-wave depressive symptoms after adjustment for baseline symptoms and covariates (b = 0.108, [0.096, 0.120]); relationship strain was the clearest adjacent signal. Exploratory MR suggested that the loneliness-depressive-symptom association may not be unidirectional, but pleiotropy, relaxed reverse instruments, sample overlap and mixed marker findings precluded directional causal interpretation.
Conclusions: Loneliness may serve as a benchmark indicator for population research, while broader measures primarily contextualise relational strain and social safety.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities.
Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas.
The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.