Optimizing flange geometry with a 532-nm green laser for four-flanged scleral fixation: experimental comparison with thermal cautery.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Do Hee Park, Kyung Yoon Kook, Yong-Sok Ji, Sang Woo Park
{"title":"Optimizing flange geometry with a 532-nm green laser for four-flanged scleral fixation: experimental comparison with thermal cautery.","authors":"Do Hee Park, Kyung Yoon Kook, Yong-Sok Ji, Sang Woo Park","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare flange geometry produced with a 532-nm green laser vs thermal cautery in four-flanged scleral fixation and to identify practical heating lengths for 5-0 and 6-0 polypropylene sutures.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dry laboratory.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Bench-top experimental study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Flanges were created on 5-0 and 6-0 polypropylene sutures using a 532-nm green laser (200 mW, 200 milliseconds, single-shot mode) or handheld thermal cautery. Heating length, defined as the distance from the suture tip to the forceps, ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 mm in 0.5-mm increments. Flange diameter and height were measured microscopically, and shape was summarized by the diameter-to-height (D/H) ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flange diameter and height increased with heating length for both devices. The laser produced larger diameters than cautery for 6-0 polypropylene at 0.5 to 1.5 mm (all P < .001) and for 5-0 polypropylene at 0.5 to 2.5 mm ( P ≤ .023). At shorter heating lengths, the laser tended to produce flatter, saucer-shaped flanges with higher D/H ratios, whereas cautery often produced taller, mushroom-shaped profiles. Using guide-needle outer diameters as practical surrogate targets (30-gauge ≈ 300 μm for 6-0; 27-gauge ≈ 400 μm for 5-0), the shortest heating length at which mean flange diameter exceeded the target was 1.0 mm with laser and 1.5 mm with cautery for both suture sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser-assisted flange formation seems to be a feasible alternative to thermal cautery. In this dry-laboratory model, 1.0-mm laser heating and 1.5-mm cautery heating provided practical target flange dimensions while maintaining modest flange height.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare flange geometry produced with a 532-nm green laser vs thermal cautery in four-flanged scleral fixation and to identify practical heating lengths for 5-0 and 6-0 polypropylene sutures.

Setting: Dry laboratory.

Design: Bench-top experimental study.

Methods: Flanges were created on 5-0 and 6-0 polypropylene sutures using a 532-nm green laser (200 mW, 200 milliseconds, single-shot mode) or handheld thermal cautery. Heating length, defined as the distance from the suture tip to the forceps, ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 mm in 0.5-mm increments. Flange diameter and height were measured microscopically, and shape was summarized by the diameter-to-height (D/H) ratio.

Results: Flange diameter and height increased with heating length for both devices. The laser produced larger diameters than cautery for 6-0 polypropylene at 0.5 to 1.5 mm (all P < .001) and for 5-0 polypropylene at 0.5 to 2.5 mm ( P ≤ .023). At shorter heating lengths, the laser tended to produce flatter, saucer-shaped flanges with higher D/H ratios, whereas cautery often produced taller, mushroom-shaped profiles. Using guide-needle outer diameters as practical surrogate targets (30-gauge ≈ 300 μm for 6-0; 27-gauge ≈ 400 μm for 5-0), the shortest heating length at which mean flange diameter exceeded the target was 1.0 mm with laser and 1.5 mm with cautery for both suture sizes.

Conclusions: Laser-assisted flange formation seems to be a feasible alternative to thermal cautery. In this dry-laboratory model, 1.0-mm laser heating and 1.5-mm cautery heating provided practical target flange dimensions while maintaining modest flange height.

用532纳米绿色激光优化翼缘几何形状用于四翼巩膜固定:与热烧灼的实验比较。
摘要:532nm的绿色激光是一种可行的替代烧灼术,在较短的加热长度下产生更大、更平坦的法兰,并支持1.0 mm的激光加热用于四法兰巩膜固定。目的:比较532nm绿色激光与热烧灼在四法兰巩膜固定中产生的法兰几何形状,并确定5-0和6-0聚丙烯缝合线的实际加热长度。设置:干燥实验室。设计:台式实验研究。方法:采用532 nm绿色激光(200 mW, 200 ms,单次发射模式)或手持式热烧灼在5-0和6-0聚丙烯缝合线上制作法兰。加热长度,定义为从缝线尖端到钳的距离,范围为0.5至3.0 mm,增量为0.5 mm。在显微镜下测量法兰直径和高度,并通过径高比(D/H)来总结形状。结果:两种装置的法兰直径和高度随加热长度的增加而增加。激光对6-0聚丙烯的直径在0.5 ~ 1.5 mm (P < 0.001),对5-0聚丙烯的直径在0.5 ~ 2.5 mm (P≤0.023),均大于烧灼。在较短的加热长度下,激光往往会产生更平坦的碟形法兰,具有更高的D/H比,而烧灼通常会产生更高的蘑菇形轮廓。以导针外径作为实际替代目标(6-0为30-gauge≈300 μm, 5-0为27-gauge≈400 μm),两种缝合尺寸的平均法兰直径超过目标的最短加热长度分别为激光1.0 mm和烧灼1.5 mm。结论:激光辅助翼缘形成似乎是一种可行的替代热烧灼。在这个干实验室模型中,1.0 mm的激光加热和1.5 mm的烧灼加热提供了实用的目标法兰尺寸,同时保持了适度的法兰高度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书