The Economic Costs of Genetic Counseling: A Combined Expert Perspective and Systematic Review.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Varinder Jeet, Julie Cigrang, Amanda Willis, Henry Cutler, Mary-Anne Young
{"title":"The Economic Costs of Genetic Counseling: A Combined Expert Perspective and Systematic Review.","authors":"Varinder Jeet, Julie Cigrang, Amanda Willis, Henry Cutler, Mary-Anne Young","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2026.102739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genetic counseling (GC) is integral to personalized medicine, yet detailed estimates of its cost remain limited despite growing demand. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on GC costs, examined variations across settings, methodologies, and reported cost components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across Embase and Ovid Medline databases. Studies were included if they reported GC costs. Data were extracted on study characteristics, methodologies, and reported costs. Costs were adjusted to 2024 values using OECD Consumer Price Index and converted to USD for comparability. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted due to methodological heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen of 1,487 screened studies met the inclusion criteria. Most relied on wage-based and time-based costing approaches, with limited use of systematic microcosting. Inflation-adjusted GC costs ranged widely ($72 to $1,970). Studies capturing only direct patient contact consistently reported lower costs than those incorporating indirect activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Published GC costs vary markedly due to differences in costing scope, methodology, and healthcare systems. Standardized costing frameworks are needed to improve comparability across studies and support accurate planning, resource allocation, service design, and evaluation in genomic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"102739"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2026.102739","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Genetic counseling (GC) is integral to personalized medicine, yet detailed estimates of its cost remain limited despite growing demand. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on GC costs, examined variations across settings, methodologies, and reported cost components.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across Embase and Ovid Medline databases. Studies were included if they reported GC costs. Data were extracted on study characteristics, methodologies, and reported costs. Costs were adjusted to 2024 values using OECD Consumer Price Index and converted to USD for comparability. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted due to methodological heterogeneity.

Results: Nineteen of 1,487 screened studies met the inclusion criteria. Most relied on wage-based and time-based costing approaches, with limited use of systematic microcosting. Inflation-adjusted GC costs ranged widely ($72 to $1,970). Studies capturing only direct patient contact consistently reported lower costs than those incorporating indirect activities.

Conclusion: Published GC costs vary markedly due to differences in costing scope, methodology, and healthcare systems. Standardized costing frameworks are needed to improve comparability across studies and support accurate planning, resource allocation, service design, and evaluation in genomic medicine.

遗传咨询的经济成本:综合专家观点和系统评价。
目的:遗传咨询(GC)是个性化医疗不可或缺的一部分,尽管需求不断增长,但其成本的详细估计仍然有限。本研究系统地回顾和综合了GC成本的证据,检查了不同设置、方法和报告成本组成部分的差异。方法:根据PRISMA指南对Embase和Ovid Medline数据库进行系统的文献综述。报告GC成本的研究被纳入。从研究特征、方法和报告成本中提取数据。使用经合组织消费者价格指数将成本调整为2024年的值,并转换为美元以进行可比性。由于研究方法的异质性,采用了叙事综合方法。结果:1487项筛选研究中有19项符合纳入标准。大多数依靠以工资和时间为基础的成本计算方法,有限地使用系统的微观成本计算。通货膨胀调整后的GC成本相差很大(72美元至1,970美元)。仅与患者直接接触的研究一致报告成本低于纳入间接接触的研究。结论:由于成本范围、方法和医疗系统的差异,公布的GC成本差异很大。需要标准化的成本计算框架来提高研究之间的可比性,并支持基因组医学的准确规划、资源分配、服务设计和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书