[A national questionnaire survey of the current status of diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis in China in 2024].

X Y Li, Y Dai, J H Shi, Y S Wu, Z Y Gu, C Y Zhang, Q T Li, H L Yan, Y Y Li, H Yu, J H Leng
{"title":"[A national questionnaire survey of the current status of diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis in China in 2024].","authors":"X Y Li, Y Dai, J H Shi, Y S Wu, Z Y Gu, C Y Zhang, Q T Li, H L Yan, Y Y Li, H Yu, J H Leng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20260427-00229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the current status of clinical practice and the implementation of existing guidelines for endometriosis in China, and to provide a reliable basis for relevant continuing medical education and future guideline revisions. <b>Methods:</b> A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using convenience sampling. Doctors in obstetrics and gynecology or reproductive medicine were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The main survey contents included: the availability of specialized endometriosis clinics at the respondents' hospitals; the respondents' experience in diagnosing and surgically managing endometriosis; and their awareness and implementation of established clinical practice guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected valid questionnaires. <b>Results:</b> A total of 651 respondents from 30 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions across China participated, with 633 valid questionnaires collected. Obstetricians and gynecologists accounted for 92.73% (587/633) of the respondents, and over 90% held the professional title of attending physician or higher. 83.41% (528/633) of the respondents had performed or participated in surgical treatment for endometriosis. Compared to data from the survey in 2018, several indicators showed improvement: the establishment of specialized endometriosis clinics [9.97% (149/1 494) vs 22.91% (145/633)], the clinical implementation of the long-term management concept for endometriosis [35.54% (531/1 494) vs 54.34% (344/633)], and the routine clinical use of endometriosis fertility index scoring system [18.74% (280/1 494) vs 37.31% (197/528)]. Pain or dysmenorrhea (96.52%, 611/633) was the most valued diagnostic basis, and \"alleviating or eliminating pain\" (94.94%, 601/633) was the top treatment goal.\"How to prevent and protect fertility impaired by endometriosis\" (91.82%, 438/477) was the most anticipated topic for future guideline updates. 68.09% (431/633) of the respondents preferred combined estrogen-progestogen regimens for perimenopausal endometriosis, and 84.36% (534/633) of the respondents reported utilizing an add-back regimen to alleviate menopausal symptoms induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Furthermore, 90.36% (572/633) of the respondents reported observing mental and psychological disorders in patients with endometriosis. <b>Conclusions:</b> This survey provides contemporary insights into the diagnosis and management of endometriosis in China, revealing a clear trend toward increasingly standardized and refined practices. Furthermore, the survey identifies unmet clinical expectations regarding current guidelines, thereby providing valuable references for the panel to more effectively promote and guide the advancement of clinical practices for endometriosis in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":10050,"journal":{"name":"中华妇产科杂志","volume":"61 9","pages":"760-767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华妇产科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20260427-00229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current status of clinical practice and the implementation of existing guidelines for endometriosis in China, and to provide a reliable basis for relevant continuing medical education and future guideline revisions. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using convenience sampling. Doctors in obstetrics and gynecology or reproductive medicine were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The main survey contents included: the availability of specialized endometriosis clinics at the respondents' hospitals; the respondents' experience in diagnosing and surgically managing endometriosis; and their awareness and implementation of established clinical practice guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected valid questionnaires. Results: A total of 651 respondents from 30 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions across China participated, with 633 valid questionnaires collected. Obstetricians and gynecologists accounted for 92.73% (587/633) of the respondents, and over 90% held the professional title of attending physician or higher. 83.41% (528/633) of the respondents had performed or participated in surgical treatment for endometriosis. Compared to data from the survey in 2018, several indicators showed improvement: the establishment of specialized endometriosis clinics [9.97% (149/1 494) vs 22.91% (145/633)], the clinical implementation of the long-term management concept for endometriosis [35.54% (531/1 494) vs 54.34% (344/633)], and the routine clinical use of endometriosis fertility index scoring system [18.74% (280/1 494) vs 37.31% (197/528)]. Pain or dysmenorrhea (96.52%, 611/633) was the most valued diagnostic basis, and "alleviating or eliminating pain" (94.94%, 601/633) was the top treatment goal."How to prevent and protect fertility impaired by endometriosis" (91.82%, 438/477) was the most anticipated topic for future guideline updates. 68.09% (431/633) of the respondents preferred combined estrogen-progestogen regimens for perimenopausal endometriosis, and 84.36% (534/633) of the respondents reported utilizing an add-back regimen to alleviate menopausal symptoms induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Furthermore, 90.36% (572/633) of the respondents reported observing mental and psychological disorders in patients with endometriosis. Conclusions: This survey provides contemporary insights into the diagnosis and management of endometriosis in China, revealing a clear trend toward increasingly standardized and refined practices. Furthermore, the survey identifies unmet clinical expectations regarding current guidelines, thereby providing valuable references for the panel to more effectively promote and guide the advancement of clinical practices for endometriosis in China.

【2024年全国子宫内膜异位症诊治现状问卷调查】。
目的:了解中国子宫内膜异位症的临床实践现状和现有指南的实施情况,为相关的继续医学教育和未来指南的修订提供可靠的依据。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,在全国范围内进行横断面调查。妇产科或生殖医学的医生被邀请完成一份在线问卷。调查的主要内容包括:受访医院子宫内膜异位症专科门诊的可及性;受访者在诊断和手术治疗子宫内膜异位症方面的经验;以及他们对既定临床实践指南的认识和执行。对收集到的有效问卷进行统计分析。结果:共有来自全国30个省、市、自治区的651名受访者参与,回收有效问卷633份。调查对象中妇产科医师占92.73%(587/633),主治医师及以上职称占90%以上。83.41%(528/633)的受访者曾接受或参与过子宫内膜异位症的手术治疗。与2018年调查数据相比,子宫内膜异位症专科诊所的建立[9.97% (149/1 494)vs 22.91%(145/633)]、子宫内膜异位症长期管理理念的临床实施[35.54% (531/1 494)vs 54.34%(344/633)]、子宫内膜异位症生育指标评分系统的常规临床应用[18.74% (280/1 494)vs 37.31%(197/528)]等指标均有所改善。疼痛或痛经(96.52%,611/633)是最重要的诊断依据,缓解或消除疼痛(94.94%,601/633)是最重要的治疗目标。“如何预防和保护子宫内膜异位症导致的生育能力受损”(91.82%,438/477)是未来指南更新中最值得期待的主题。68.09%(431/633)的应答者首选雌激素-孕激素联合方案治疗围绝经期子宫内膜异位症,84.36%(534/633)的应答者报告使用加回方案缓解促性腺激素释放激素激动剂引起的绝经期症状。此外,90.36%(572/633)的受访者表示观察到子宫内膜异位症患者存在精神和心理障碍。结论:本调查为中国子宫内膜异位症的诊断和治疗提供了当代见解,揭示了日益规范化和精细化的明显趋势。此外,调查还发现了当前指南未满足的临床期望,从而为小组更有效地促进和指导中国子宫内膜异位症的临床实践提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12682
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书