Validation of an ovine lung parenchyma material model with pressures representing the breathing cycle for high-velocity impacts

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Patricia K. Thomas, Eugene Ablordeppey, Grace K. Liverett, Philip J. Brown, F. Scott Gayzik
{"title":"Validation of an ovine lung parenchyma material model with pressures representing the breathing cycle for high-velocity impacts","authors":"Patricia K. Thomas,&nbsp;Eugene Ablordeppey,&nbsp;Grace K. Liverett,&nbsp;Philip J. Brown,&nbsp;F. Scott Gayzik","doi":"10.1007/s10237-026-02124-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lung injury risk from high-velocity blunt impacts is thought to depend on lung pressure. Risk is typically assessed with finite element models (FEMs), but models do not typically account for lung pressure, nor do they account for lung viscoelasticity. The objective of this study is to translate and then validate a set of lung material models that consider both tissue viscoelasticity and pressure in silico<i>.</i> This was completed using one set of quasi-static simulations for translation and one set of dynamic simulations for validation to compare to experimental forces, where CORA was utilized. Digital image correlation (DIC) data of strain and displacement magnitude from the quasi-static experiments were also used to ensure proper material model translation. Three simulations were run for each loading case, where the only difference was the lung material properties to account for pressure (0, 4, and 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). The force–time responses for both simulations showed good agreement with experimental data with a range of 0.77–0.93 CORA scores for the dynamic loading, and a range of 0.84–0.97 CORA scores for the quasi-static simulations, with all simulations falling under “good” or “excellent” categories. The DIC-equivalent data for the quasi-static simulations were determined to be dependent on mesh size. Overall, the quasi-static simulations showed the material was translated into LS-Dyna well, and each of the lung material models were able to reproduce the global force–time responses well in the dynamic simulation set.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-026-02124-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung injury risk from high-velocity blunt impacts is thought to depend on lung pressure. Risk is typically assessed with finite element models (FEMs), but models do not typically account for lung pressure, nor do they account for lung viscoelasticity. The objective of this study is to translate and then validate a set of lung material models that consider both tissue viscoelasticity and pressure in silico. This was completed using one set of quasi-static simulations for translation and one set of dynamic simulations for validation to compare to experimental forces, where CORA was utilized. Digital image correlation (DIC) data of strain and displacement magnitude from the quasi-static experiments were also used to ensure proper material model translation. Three simulations were run for each loading case, where the only difference was the lung material properties to account for pressure (0, 4, and 10 cmH2O). The force–time responses for both simulations showed good agreement with experimental data with a range of 0.77–0.93 CORA scores for the dynamic loading, and a range of 0.84–0.97 CORA scores for the quasi-static simulations, with all simulations falling under “good” or “excellent” categories. The DIC-equivalent data for the quasi-static simulations were determined to be dependent on mesh size. Overall, the quasi-static simulations showed the material was translated into LS-Dyna well, and each of the lung material models were able to reproduce the global force–time responses well in the dynamic simulation set.

用压力代表高速撞击呼吸循环的绵羊肺实质物质模型的验证。
高速钝器撞击造成肺损伤的风险被认为与肺压力有关。通常使用有限元模型(fem)评估风险,但模型通常不考虑肺压力,也不考虑肺粘弹性。本研究的目的是翻译并验证一组考虑组织粘弹性和硅压力的肺材料模型。这是通过一组准静态模拟来完成的平移和一组动态模拟来验证与实验力的比较,其中使用了CORA。还利用准静态实验的应变和位移幅度的数字图像相关(DIC)数据来确保适当的材料模型转换。每种加载情况都进行了三次模拟,其中唯一的区别是肺材料特性,以解释压力(0,4和10 cmH2O)。两种模拟的力-时间响应与实验数据吻合良好,动态加载的CORA分数范围为0.77 ~ 0.93,准静态模拟的CORA分数范围为0.84 ~ 0.97,所有模拟都属于“好”或“优秀”类别。准静态模拟的dic等效数据取决于网格尺寸。总体而言,准静态模拟表明,材料可以很好地转换为LS-Dyna,并且每种肺材料模型都能够很好地再现动态模拟集中的全局力-时间响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书