Post-Search Validation and Curation of Site-Resolved N-Glycoproteomics Data

IF 8.5 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
JACS Au Pub Date : 2026-09-28 Epub Date: 2026-09-09 DOI:10.1021/jacsau.6c00875
Adam P. Urminsky, Juan C. Rojas E., Lenka Hernychova, Noortje de Haan
{"title":"Post-Search Validation and Curation of Site-Resolved N-Glycoproteomics Data","authors":"Adam P. Urminsky,&nbsp;Juan C. Rojas E.,&nbsp;Lenka Hernychova,&nbsp;Noortje de Haan","doi":"10.1021/jacsau.6c00875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the significant\r\nrole of glycosylation in modulating protein\r\nstructure and activity, glycoproteomics is gaining increased interest\r\nfrom the broad scientific community. Large-scale site-resolved N-glycoproteomics\r\nrelies on automated MS<sup>2</sup>-based searches, but candidate glycopeptide\r\nassignments can remain ambiguous when isomeric or isobaric glycan\r\nstructures, adducts, chemical modifications, in-source fragments,\r\nor incomplete MS<sup>2</sup> evidence support more than one plausible\r\ninterpretation. Here, we systematically categorize common challenges\r\nand misassignments in glycoproteomics and present a post-search validation\r\nworkflow using Skyline software to identify and correct these. The\r\nworkflow matches search-engine-derived candidate assignments to LC–MS/MS\r\nevidence for correct precursor monoisotope assignment, retention time\r\nbehavior, and glycosite context. The workflow is demonstrated with\r\nByonic-derived glycopeptide candidate lists and converts automated\r\nsearch results into curated, verifiable, site-resolved N-glycopeptide\r\nfeatures for downstream quantification and reporting. We applied the\r\nworkflow to data from 52 human serum samples, and reviewed 3,071 candidate\r\nN-glycopeptide IDs. From these, 1,722 MS<sup>2</sup> candidate IDs\r\nwere refuted as inconsistent with chromatographic and/or precursor-level\r\nevidence. Curation added 320 glycopeptide features, comprising 152\r\nMS<sup>1</sup>-supported composition-level assignments and 168 additional\r\nLC-resolved isomer features, yielding a final curated feature set\r\nof 1,436 N-glycopeptides across the serum N-glycoproteome. Together,\r\nthese results show that reviewing the raw LC-MS/MS data associated\r\nwith search-engine results improves both the accuracy and comprehensiveness\r\nof detectable N-glycopeptides, supporting more transparent and reliable\r\nreporting. The curated dataset provides a resource for future method\r\ndevelopment, benchmarking and machine–learning efforts directed\r\nat automated glycopeptide validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94060,"journal":{"name":"JACS Au","volume":"6 9","pages":"5478–5493"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACS Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.6c00875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the significant role of glycosylation in modulating protein structure and activity, glycoproteomics is gaining increased interest from the broad scientific community. Large-scale site-resolved N-glycoproteomics relies on automated MS2-based searches, but candidate glycopeptide assignments can remain ambiguous when isomeric or isobaric glycan structures, adducts, chemical modifications, in-source fragments, or incomplete MS2 evidence support more than one plausible interpretation. Here, we systematically categorize common challenges and misassignments in glycoproteomics and present a post-search validation workflow using Skyline software to identify and correct these. The workflow matches search-engine-derived candidate assignments to LC–MS/MS evidence for correct precursor monoisotope assignment, retention time behavior, and glycosite context. The workflow is demonstrated with Byonic-derived glycopeptide candidate lists and converts automated search results into curated, verifiable, site-resolved N-glycopeptide features for downstream quantification and reporting. We applied the workflow to data from 52 human serum samples, and reviewed 3,071 candidate N-glycopeptide IDs. From these, 1,722 MS2 candidate IDs were refuted as inconsistent with chromatographic and/or precursor-level evidence. Curation added 320 glycopeptide features, comprising 152 MS1-supported composition-level assignments and 168 additional LC-resolved isomer features, yielding a final curated feature set of 1,436 N-glycopeptides across the serum N-glycoproteome. Together, these results show that reviewing the raw LC-MS/MS data associated with search-engine results improves both the accuracy and comprehensiveness of detectable N-glycopeptides, supporting more transparent and reliable reporting. The curated dataset provides a resource for future method development, benchmarking and machine–learning efforts directed at automated glycopeptide validation.

位点解析n -糖蛋白组学数据的搜索后验证和管理
鉴于糖基化在调节蛋白质结构和活性方面的重要作用,糖蛋白组学正受到广泛科学界的越来越多的关注。大规模的位点分辨n-糖蛋白组学依赖于基于MS2的自动搜索,但是当异构体或等压糖结构、加合物、化学修饰、源内片段或不完整的MS2证据支持不止一种合理的解释时,候选糖肽分配可能仍然不明确。在这里,我们系统地分类了糖蛋白组学中常见的挑战和错误分配,并提出了使用Skyline软件识别和纠正这些问题的搜索后验证工作流程。工作流匹配搜索引擎衍生的候选分配到LC-MS / mseence,以正确的前体单同位素分配,保留时间行为和糖基背景。该工作流程演示了byonic衍生的糖肽候选列表,并将自动搜索结果转换为策划的,可验证的,位点解析的n -糖肽特征,用于下游量化和报告。我们将该工作流程应用于52份人类血清样本的数据,并审查了3071个候选糖肽id。其中,1722个MS2候选id被反驳为与色谱和/或前体水平的证据不一致。管理增加了320个糖肽特征,包括152ms1支持的成分水平分配和168个额外的allc分辨异构体特征,最终产生了横跨血清n-糖蛋白组的1436个n-糖肽的管理特征集。总之,这些结果表明,回顾与搜索引擎结果相关的原始LC-MS/MS数据提高了可检测n -糖肽的准确性和全面性,支持更透明和可靠的报告。整理的数据集为未来的方法开发、基准测试和机器学习工作提供了一个资源,用于自动糖肽验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书