Hyerim Seo, Eunhye Park, Kyeongmee Lee, Juyeon Yoo, Jwa-Min Nam
{"title":"Plasmonic Nanoparticle-Metal–Organic Framework Hybrid Nanostructures for Biomedical Applications: From Design to Function","authors":"Hyerim Seo, Eunhye Park, Kyeongmee Lee, Juyeon Yoo, Jwa-Min Nam","doi":"10.1021/jacsau.6c01084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plasmonic nanoparticle-metal–organic framework\r\n(plasmonic\r\nNP-MOF) hybrid nanostructures have emerged as distinctive platforms\r\nthat synergistically combine the physical, chemical, and biological\r\nproperties and functions of plasmonic nanoparticles and MOFs, enabling\r\nbiomedical capabilities inaccessible to either component alone. This\r\nPerspective focuses on a central design-to-function relationship:\r\nthe structural paradigm between the plasmonic nanoparticle and the\r\nMOF governs how the properties of the two components complement one\r\nanother and interact synergistically. We consider four principal configurations:\r\nplasmonic NPs embedded within MOF pores, plasmonic NPs decorate the\r\nMOF exterior, and a plasmonic NP serves as the core of a plasmonic@MOF\r\ncore–shell structure or forms the shell of a MOF@plasmonic\r\nNP core–shell structure. Each configuration offers distinct\r\nfunctional advantages suited to specific biomedical applications.\r\nHere, we first review the synthetic strategies and formation mechanisms\r\nunderlying these four hybrid nanostructures. We then examine how these\r\nstructure-dependent properties manifest across three major biomedical\r\napplication areas: biosensing, drug delivery, and therapeutic applications.\r\nFinally, we identify the synthetic limitations constraining structural\r\nprecision, reproducibility, and material versatility, as well as translational\r\nbarriers that must be addressed to advance plasmonic nanoparticle–MOF\r\nhybrids toward robust and clinically relevant biomedical probes and\r\nplatforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94060,"journal":{"name":"JACS Au","volume":"6 9","pages":"4857–4874"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACS Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.6c01084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plasmonic nanoparticle-metal–organic framework
(plasmonic
NP-MOF) hybrid nanostructures have emerged as distinctive platforms
that synergistically combine the physical, chemical, and biological
properties and functions of plasmonic nanoparticles and MOFs, enabling
biomedical capabilities inaccessible to either component alone. This
Perspective focuses on a central design-to-function relationship:
the structural paradigm between the plasmonic nanoparticle and the
MOF governs how the properties of the two components complement one
another and interact synergistically. We consider four principal configurations:
plasmonic NPs embedded within MOF pores, plasmonic NPs decorate the
MOF exterior, and a plasmonic NP serves as the core of a plasmonic@MOF
core–shell structure or forms the shell of a MOF@plasmonic
NP core–shell structure. Each configuration offers distinct
functional advantages suited to specific biomedical applications.
Here, we first review the synthetic strategies and formation mechanisms
underlying these four hybrid nanostructures. We then examine how these
structure-dependent properties manifest across three major biomedical
application areas: biosensing, drug delivery, and therapeutic applications.
Finally, we identify the synthetic limitations constraining structural
precision, reproducibility, and material versatility, as well as translational
barriers that must be addressed to advance plasmonic nanoparticle–MOF
hybrids toward robust and clinically relevant biomedical probes and
platforms.