Supporting Public Safety by Encouraging Nurses' Use of Alternative-to-Discipline Programs.

IF 2.4
Yitong Wang, Amanda Choflet, Jordan Ferris, Karen J Foli, Rebekah Halmo
{"title":"Supporting Public Safety by Encouraging Nurses' Use of Alternative-to-Discipline Programs.","authors":"Yitong Wang, Amanda Choflet, Jordan Ferris, Karen J Foli, Rebekah Halmo","doi":"10.1177/29767342261490465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative-to-discipline (ATD) programs were developed to address substance use disorder (SUD) among licensed health professionals by offering a recovery-oriented monitoring pathway in lieu of public disciplinary action. ATD programs do not provide treatment; they protect the public by facilitating evaluation and treatment engagement, monitoring individualized recovery plans, and, when appropriate, safe return to practice. While ATD programs are applicable for a range of health professions, nursing serves as a useful case because it is a profession in which licensure oversight, employer action, patient safety, and workforce consequences uniquely converge. Relatedly, evidence suggests that substance use in nursing is not rare, that clinician substance use can affect quality of care, and that recovery in nursing is shaped not only by treatment but also by stigma, regulatory burden, financial barriers, communication problems, and return-to-work barriers. However, program availability does not establish that every nurse with SUD should enter regulatory monitoring. Some nurses seek treatment or mutual support independently before professional practice is affected, whereas others may consider voluntary ATD entry to preserve a nonpublic path to licensure and practice. The question for nursing is no longer whether ATD programs should exist. The more pressing question is whether nurses can reach and use these programs in ways that are timely, psychologically safe, and professionally workable enough to support both public protection and personal recovery. This commentary argues that nursing ATD programs should be evaluated not only by whether they exist but also by whether nurses can realistically access, enter, remain in, and safely return to practice through them. Late entry into treatment remains worthwhile and should never be dismissed. Still, a public protection model works best when the benefits, burdens, limits of confidentiality, and potential career implications are described clearly.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342261490465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342261490465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative-to-discipline (ATD) programs were developed to address substance use disorder (SUD) among licensed health professionals by offering a recovery-oriented monitoring pathway in lieu of public disciplinary action. ATD programs do not provide treatment; they protect the public by facilitating evaluation and treatment engagement, monitoring individualized recovery plans, and, when appropriate, safe return to practice. While ATD programs are applicable for a range of health professions, nursing serves as a useful case because it is a profession in which licensure oversight, employer action, patient safety, and workforce consequences uniquely converge. Relatedly, evidence suggests that substance use in nursing is not rare, that clinician substance use can affect quality of care, and that recovery in nursing is shaped not only by treatment but also by stigma, regulatory burden, financial barriers, communication problems, and return-to-work barriers. However, program availability does not establish that every nurse with SUD should enter regulatory monitoring. Some nurses seek treatment or mutual support independently before professional practice is affected, whereas others may consider voluntary ATD entry to preserve a nonpublic path to licensure and practice. The question for nursing is no longer whether ATD programs should exist. The more pressing question is whether nurses can reach and use these programs in ways that are timely, psychologically safe, and professionally workable enough to support both public protection and personal recovery. This commentary argues that nursing ATD programs should be evaluated not only by whether they exist but also by whether nurses can realistically access, enter, remain in, and safely return to practice through them. Late entry into treatment remains worthwhile and should never be dismissed. Still, a public protection model works best when the benefits, burdens, limits of confidentiality, and potential career implications are described clearly.

通过鼓励护士使用纪律替代方案来支持公共安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书