Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of incompetent perforating veins in patients undergoing endovenous treatment for varicose veins.

IF 1.5
Yasuhiko Ibaragi, Seiya Kikuchi, Kanshi Komatsu
{"title":"Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of incompetent perforating veins in patients undergoing endovenous treatment for varicose veins.","authors":"Yasuhiko Ibaragi, Seiya Kikuchi, Kanshi Komatsu","doi":"10.1177/02683555261493234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesIncompetent perforating veins (IPVs) are important contributors to chronic venous disease (CVD), yet their clinical significance remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics associated with IPVs in patients undergoing endovenous treatment for varicose veins.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 limbs treated between 2021 and 2025. Limbs were categorized into IPV-positive and IPV-negative groups based on duplex ultrasonography. Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to identify predictors of IPV presence.ResultsAmong 192 limbs, IPVs were identified in 102 (53.1%). Multivariable analysis identified saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameter as an independent predictor of IPV (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08-1.49; <i>p</i> = 0.005). ROC analysis revealed an optimal cutoff for SFJ diameter of 7.75 mm for predicting IPV (Area Under the Curve [AUC]: 0.646; sensitivity 65.0%, specificity 65.2%). CEAP classification was numerically higher in the IPV-positive group (3.11 vs 2.86), although the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.379).ConclusionSFJ diameter was independently associated with IPV presence and may serve as a practical ultrasonographic marker for identifying perforator incompetence in patients with varicose veins. Standardized duplex ultrasonography, including assessment of SFJ diameter, may facilitate objective treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555261493234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261493234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesIncompetent perforating veins (IPVs) are important contributors to chronic venous disease (CVD), yet their clinical significance remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics associated with IPVs in patients undergoing endovenous treatment for varicose veins.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 limbs treated between 2021 and 2025. Limbs were categorized into IPV-positive and IPV-negative groups based on duplex ultrasonography. Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to identify predictors of IPV presence.ResultsAmong 192 limbs, IPVs were identified in 102 (53.1%). Multivariable analysis identified saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameter as an independent predictor of IPV (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08-1.49; p = 0.005). ROC analysis revealed an optimal cutoff for SFJ diameter of 7.75 mm for predicting IPV (Area Under the Curve [AUC]: 0.646; sensitivity 65.0%, specificity 65.2%). CEAP classification was numerically higher in the IPV-positive group (3.11 vs 2.86), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.379).ConclusionSFJ diameter was independently associated with IPV presence and may serve as a practical ultrasonographic marker for identifying perforator incompetence in patients with varicose veins. Standardized duplex ultrasonography, including assessment of SFJ diameter, may facilitate objective treatment planning.

静脉曲张患者接受静脉内治疗时静脉穿孔功能不全的临床和超声预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书