Stefan R van Dinter, Pim S van Sambeeck, Nesar A Hasami, Amir H Sadeghi, Michel W A Verkroost, Tychon E A Geeraedts, Jan Jaap Janssen, Foeke J H Nauta, Nabil Saouti, Robin H Heijmen
{"title":"Distal anastomotic new entries after acute type A aortic dissection surgery: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Stefan R van Dinter, Pim S van Sambeeck, Nesar A Hasami, Amir H Sadeghi, Michel W A Verkroost, Tychon E A Geeraedts, Jan Jaap Janssen, Foeke J H Nauta, Nabil Saouti, Robin H Heijmen","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivag262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Distal anastomotic new entry (DANE) after acute type A aortic dissection repair may contribute to adverse downstream aortic remodelling. This study evaluated the incidence of postoperative DANE and its association with distal aortic growth, reintervention, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing type A aortic dissection repair with residual downstream dissection (DeBakey I) between 2011 and 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Computed tomography angiography was systematically reviewed for DANE using two-plane distal anastomosis alignment. Longitudinal descending thoracic aortic maximum diameters were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Univariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 164 patients were included, of whom 77 (47.0%) had postoperative DANE. Patients with DANE demonstrated larger distal aortic diameters over time compared with patients without DANE, while baseline diameters were similar (37.6 versus 37.3, p = 0.77). At 3-5 years, estimated maximum descending thoracic aortic diameter was 51.6 mm versus 42.7 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). DANE was associated with ≥10 mm downstream aortic growth, ≥55 mm maximum diameter and reintervention during 5-year follow-up (combined odds ratio 5.60 [2.48-12.65], p < 0.001). Overall survival did not differ between groups (hazard ratio 2.04 [0.80-5.18], p = 0.13). Cox regression demonstrated higher hazard ratios with DANE for reintervention (2.01 [1.01-3.97], p = 0.04) and reaching ≥55 mm aortic diameter (5.59 [2.33-13.42], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DANE occurred frequently after type A aortic dissection repair and was strongly associated with accelerated downstream aortic growth and reintervention. Routine postoperative assessment and strategies aimed at preventing or treating DANE may improve long-term aortic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Distal anastomotic new entry (DANE) after acute type A aortic dissection repair may contribute to adverse downstream aortic remodelling. This study evaluated the incidence of postoperative DANE and its association with distal aortic growth, reintervention, and clinical outcomes.
Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing type A aortic dissection repair with residual downstream dissection (DeBakey I) between 2011 and 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Computed tomography angiography was systematically reviewed for DANE using two-plane distal anastomosis alignment. Longitudinal descending thoracic aortic maximum diameters were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Univariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.
Results: A total of 164 patients were included, of whom 77 (47.0%) had postoperative DANE. Patients with DANE demonstrated larger distal aortic diameters over time compared with patients without DANE, while baseline diameters were similar (37.6 versus 37.3, p = 0.77). At 3-5 years, estimated maximum descending thoracic aortic diameter was 51.6 mm versus 42.7 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). DANE was associated with ≥10 mm downstream aortic growth, ≥55 mm maximum diameter and reintervention during 5-year follow-up (combined odds ratio 5.60 [2.48-12.65], p < 0.001). Overall survival did not differ between groups (hazard ratio 2.04 [0.80-5.18], p = 0.13). Cox regression demonstrated higher hazard ratios with DANE for reintervention (2.01 [1.01-3.97], p = 0.04) and reaching ≥55 mm aortic diameter (5.59 [2.33-13.42], p < 0.001).
Conclusions: DANE occurred frequently after type A aortic dissection repair and was strongly associated with accelerated downstream aortic growth and reintervention. Routine postoperative assessment and strategies aimed at preventing or treating DANE may improve long-term aortic outcomes.