From evidence to action: Why employers must address prolonged sitting in modern workplaces.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Muslim Abbas Syed, Andrew C K Lee
{"title":"From evidence to action: Why employers must address prolonged sitting in modern workplaces.","authors":"Muslim Abbas Syed, Andrew C K Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global workforce has undergone substantial transformation in recent decades, with technological advances, digitalization, remote working, and expanding administrative demands contributing to an increase in sedentary occupations. As a result, prolonged sitting has become a routine feature of working life for many office-based employees across diverse sectors. Although the health risks associated with sedentary behavior are well established, prolonged occupational sitting remains relatively overlooked within workplace health policy and public health practice. Evidence consistently links extended sitting with adverse health outcomes including cardiometabolic disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders, reduced wellbeing, and premature mortality. Importantly, these risks may persist even among individuals who meet recommended physical activity guidelines, highlighting sedentary behavior as a distinct occupational exposure rather than simply the absence of exercise. Despite growing awareness of these harms, many workers encounter structural barriers that limit opportunities for movement during the working day. Job design, workload expectations, digital working practices, organizational culture, and performance pressures often reinforce prolonged sitting as the default mode of work. This editorial argues that the challenge is no longer a lack of evidence but a lack of implementation. Framing sedentary behavior as a matter of individual responsibility overlooks the organizational and environmental factors that shape daily workplace behaviors. Consequently, efforts to reduce occupational sitting should shift from individual-level messaging toward employer-led and system-level solutions. Evidence-informed interventions, including active workstations, movement-promoting workplace design, standing meetings, and supportive organizational policies, offer practical opportunities to reduce sedentary exposure. The next phase of public health action should focus on organizational accountability and workplace redesign, ensuring that healthier behaviors are supported by the environments in which people work rather than relying solely on individual choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"106484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global workforce has undergone substantial transformation in recent decades, with technological advances, digitalization, remote working, and expanding administrative demands contributing to an increase in sedentary occupations. As a result, prolonged sitting has become a routine feature of working life for many office-based employees across diverse sectors. Although the health risks associated with sedentary behavior are well established, prolonged occupational sitting remains relatively overlooked within workplace health policy and public health practice. Evidence consistently links extended sitting with adverse health outcomes including cardiometabolic disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders, reduced wellbeing, and premature mortality. Importantly, these risks may persist even among individuals who meet recommended physical activity guidelines, highlighting sedentary behavior as a distinct occupational exposure rather than simply the absence of exercise. Despite growing awareness of these harms, many workers encounter structural barriers that limit opportunities for movement during the working day. Job design, workload expectations, digital working practices, organizational culture, and performance pressures often reinforce prolonged sitting as the default mode of work. This editorial argues that the challenge is no longer a lack of evidence but a lack of implementation. Framing sedentary behavior as a matter of individual responsibility overlooks the organizational and environmental factors that shape daily workplace behaviors. Consequently, efforts to reduce occupational sitting should shift from individual-level messaging toward employer-led and system-level solutions. Evidence-informed interventions, including active workstations, movement-promoting workplace design, standing meetings, and supportive organizational policies, offer practical opportunities to reduce sedentary exposure. The next phase of public health action should focus on organizational accountability and workplace redesign, ensuring that healthier behaviors are supported by the environments in which people work rather than relying solely on individual choice.

从证据到行动:为什么雇主必须解决现代工作场所久坐的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书