Effect of Multi-Modal Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Jing Chen, Zheli Chen, Fei Fang, Zhixing Shen, Xin Zu, Xuqi Wu, Wanqiu Na, Weiliang He, Liang Xu, Xilong Jin, Keyang Pan, Chunsheng Wang
{"title":"Effect of Multi-Modal Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.","authors":"Jing Chen, Zheli Chen, Fei Fang, Zhixing Shen, Xin Zu, Xuqi Wu, Wanqiu Na, Weiliang He, Liang Xu, Xilong Jin, Keyang Pan, Chunsheng Wang","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate whether a multi-modal training that combined Baduanjin, computerized cognitive training, and reminiscence therapy is associated with improved cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a pilot randomized controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-five patients with MCI were randomly assigned into an intervention group (a 24-week multi-modal training) and a control group (health education). Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, week 12, and week 24 using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted across 3 time points to examine the group effects, time effects, and interactions. RESULTS Significant group × time interactions were observed for MMSE and MoCA (both P<0.001). At 24 weeks, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in MMSE score, with a between-group difference of 1.88 points (P<0.001), and in MoCA score, with a between-group difference of 1.62 points (P<0.001). Exploratory MoCA subdomain analyses suggested possible domain-specific benefits in the intervention group, with nominal declines in naming, memory, and attention in controls. CONCLUSIONS This pilot randomized controlled trial provides preliminary evidence that a 24-week multi-modal program combining Baduanjin, computerized cognitive training, and reminiscence therapy was associated with improved global cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults with MCI compared with health education alone. Given the pilot nature of the study and the modest between-group differences, these findings should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in larger, adequately powered trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate whether a multi-modal training that combined Baduanjin, computerized cognitive training, and reminiscence therapy is associated with improved cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a pilot randomized controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-five patients with MCI were randomly assigned into an intervention group (a 24-week multi-modal training) and a control group (health education). Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, week 12, and week 24 using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted across 3 time points to examine the group effects, time effects, and interactions. RESULTS Significant group × time interactions were observed for MMSE and MoCA (both P<0.001). At 24 weeks, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in MMSE score, with a between-group difference of 1.88 points (P<0.001), and in MoCA score, with a between-group difference of 1.62 points (P<0.001). Exploratory MoCA subdomain analyses suggested possible domain-specific benefits in the intervention group, with nominal declines in naming, memory, and attention in controls. CONCLUSIONS This pilot randomized controlled trial provides preliminary evidence that a 24-week multi-modal program combining Baduanjin, computerized cognitive training, and reminiscence therapy was associated with improved global cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults with MCI compared with health education alone. Given the pilot nature of the study and the modest between-group differences, these findings should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in larger, adequately powered trials.

多模式训练对轻度认知障碍患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书