Rapid Molecular Diagnostics of Tuberculosis: What Do We Have, What Do We Need?

IF 1.9 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Bruno Luukinen
{"title":"Rapid Molecular Diagnostics of Tuberculosis: What Do We Have, What Do We Need?","authors":"Bruno Luukinen","doi":"10.1155/pm/9947140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smear microscopy and culture are conventional methods of tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics. Microscopy is fast and inexpensive but has low sensitivity, whereas culture is highly sensitive but may take several weeks. Molecular diagnostic (MDx) methods were widely introduced into TB diagnostics much later, in the early 2010s, when the GeneXpert system was launched. MDx methods combine the benefits of the conventional methods. Furthermore, significant developments have occurred in recent years. The current selection of available rapid MDx methods covers the full range of TB diagnostics: detection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB, narrow- to broad-range rapid drug susceptibility testing, mycobacterial species identification, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strain typing. Several issues-often focusing on high assay costs-have still prevented the complete roll-out of MDx methods over conventional methods in both low-resource, high-incidence settings and high-resource, low-incidence settings. This review covers topics related to molecular detection of MTB and MTB drug resistance directly from clinical specimens. The aim of the review is to describe currently available methods, how they perform, and what key issues must be addressed for more optimal implementation. Overall, MDx methods currently represent an essential but often accessory tool in the detection of TB and MTB drug resistance. At present, several limitations-including diagnostic equivalence with the reference method, breadth of drug resistance testing, treatment monitoring, and accessibility due to analysis costs and assay complexity-still hinder efficient replacement of the conventional smear microscopy and culture methods. However, new advances in testing methods and strategies are continuously being made.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"2026 1","pages":"e9947140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pm/9947140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smear microscopy and culture are conventional methods of tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics. Microscopy is fast and inexpensive but has low sensitivity, whereas culture is highly sensitive but may take several weeks. Molecular diagnostic (MDx) methods were widely introduced into TB diagnostics much later, in the early 2010s, when the GeneXpert system was launched. MDx methods combine the benefits of the conventional methods. Furthermore, significant developments have occurred in recent years. The current selection of available rapid MDx methods covers the full range of TB diagnostics: detection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB, narrow- to broad-range rapid drug susceptibility testing, mycobacterial species identification, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strain typing. Several issues-often focusing on high assay costs-have still prevented the complete roll-out of MDx methods over conventional methods in both low-resource, high-incidence settings and high-resource, low-incidence settings. This review covers topics related to molecular detection of MTB and MTB drug resistance directly from clinical specimens. The aim of the review is to describe currently available methods, how they perform, and what key issues must be addressed for more optimal implementation. Overall, MDx methods currently represent an essential but often accessory tool in the detection of TB and MTB drug resistance. At present, several limitations-including diagnostic equivalence with the reference method, breadth of drug resistance testing, treatment monitoring, and accessibility due to analysis costs and assay complexity-still hinder efficient replacement of the conventional smear microscopy and culture methods. However, new advances in testing methods and strategies are continuously being made.

结核病的快速分子诊断:我们有什么,我们需要什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书