Utilizing the CFIR to Evaluate Rural COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: Extension Personnel Perspectives.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2026-09-05 DOI:10.3390/vaccines14090776
Megan Undeberg, Ghazal Meratnia, Skylar Zelenko, Kimberly McKeirnan
{"title":"Utilizing the CFIR to Evaluate Rural COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: Extension Personnel Perspectives.","authors":"Megan Undeberg, Ghazal Meratnia, Skylar Zelenko, Kimberly McKeirnan","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14090776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Rural populations in the United States experienced consistently lower COVID-19 vaccination rates than urban populations during the pandemic. While barriers to vaccination have been well documented, less is known about facilitators of uptake in rural settings. This study aimed to identify facilitators of COVID-19 vaccination in rural communities from the perspectives of Washington State University (WSU) Extension personnel and to examine these factors using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Outer Setting domain. <b>Methods:</b> A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured key informant interviews with WSU Extension personnel. Twenty-one participants representing 34 of 40 Extension offices across Washington State were interviewed in Fall 2023. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Findings were organized into the seven CFIR Outer Setting constructs: critical incidents, local attitudes, local conditions, partnerships and connections, policies and laws, financing, and external pressures. <b>Results:</b> Perceived facilitators of COVID-19 vaccination were identified across all CFIR Outer Setting constructs. Trust emerged as a central theme, with participants reporting that vaccine acceptance was higher when information was delivered by trusted local sources, including Extension personnel, healthcare providers, community leaders, and informal networks. Participants described leveraging partnerships with public health agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, and community groups as enhancing outreach and information dissemination. Additional facilitators identified by participants included no-cost vaccine and personal protective equipment availability, accessible community-based vaccination sites, culturally appropriate educational materials, and coordinated communication systems. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rural vaccination efforts were supported by trust, strong community partnerships, and locally tailored strategies. These findings may inform future public health emergency responses in rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13611241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14090776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Rural populations in the United States experienced consistently lower COVID-19 vaccination rates than urban populations during the pandemic. While barriers to vaccination have been well documented, less is known about facilitators of uptake in rural settings. This study aimed to identify facilitators of COVID-19 vaccination in rural communities from the perspectives of Washington State University (WSU) Extension personnel and to examine these factors using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Outer Setting domain. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured key informant interviews with WSU Extension personnel. Twenty-one participants representing 34 of 40 Extension offices across Washington State were interviewed in Fall 2023. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Findings were organized into the seven CFIR Outer Setting constructs: critical incidents, local attitudes, local conditions, partnerships and connections, policies and laws, financing, and external pressures. Results: Perceived facilitators of COVID-19 vaccination were identified across all CFIR Outer Setting constructs. Trust emerged as a central theme, with participants reporting that vaccine acceptance was higher when information was delivered by trusted local sources, including Extension personnel, healthcare providers, community leaders, and informal networks. Participants described leveraging partnerships with public health agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, and community groups as enhancing outreach and information dissemination. Additional facilitators identified by participants included no-cost vaccine and personal protective equipment availability, accessible community-based vaccination sites, culturally appropriate educational materials, and coordinated communication systems. Conclusions: Rural vaccination efforts were supported by trust, strong community partnerships, and locally tailored strategies. These findings may inform future public health emergency responses in rural communities.

利用CFIR评估农村COVID-19疫苗摄取:推广人员的观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书