Simon Knobloch, Theresa Jansen, Lara Caroline Hille, Madeleine Müller, Leonie Rumpf, Christian Francis Lewis Bauer, Jan Haaker
{"title":"Resolving temporal threat uncertainty by observational learning involves the amygdala, hippocampus and anterior insula.","authors":"Simon Knobloch, Theresa Jansen, Lara Caroline Hille, Madeleine Müller, Leonie Rumpf, Christian Francis Lewis Bauer, Jan Haaker","doi":"10.1038/s41398-026-04492-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By observing others' experiences, humans learn about threats while avoiding firsthand dangers. Yet, previous neuroscience research has focused on observational threats that are predictable. In firsthand learning, temporally predictable and unpredictable threats can be mechanistically discerned. In this study, we developed a novel observational paradigm in which participants learned from predictable and unpredictable observational threats, as well as a no-threat condition. Participants encountered the same conditions during an expression phase to investigate how the brain encodes predictive and unpredictive threat cues observed in others. Participants in Experiment 1 (n = 20, 14 female, 6 male) and Experiment 2 (n = 23, 9 female, 1 non-binary, 13 male) successfully learned threat contingencies, showing heightened threat expectations for predictive cues and unpredictable condition-onsets. Behavioral findings converged with neural (fMRI, Experiment 2) responses in the anterior insula during the expression phase. Reflecting the dynamic process of learning, amygdala activation in response to predictive threat cues displayed a linear decrease across trials. Interestingly, BOLD responses to others' pain that was predictable, were enhanced within the amygdala, insula and hippocampus, compared to unpredictable conditions. Our findings suggest that humans can learn to resolve temporal threat uncertainty, through the observation of others. The present work thereby contributes to understanding the social aspects of fear and anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04492-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
By observing others' experiences, humans learn about threats while avoiding firsthand dangers. Yet, previous neuroscience research has focused on observational threats that are predictable. In firsthand learning, temporally predictable and unpredictable threats can be mechanistically discerned. In this study, we developed a novel observational paradigm in which participants learned from predictable and unpredictable observational threats, as well as a no-threat condition. Participants encountered the same conditions during an expression phase to investigate how the brain encodes predictive and unpredictive threat cues observed in others. Participants in Experiment 1 (n = 20, 14 female, 6 male) and Experiment 2 (n = 23, 9 female, 1 non-binary, 13 male) successfully learned threat contingencies, showing heightened threat expectations for predictive cues and unpredictable condition-onsets. Behavioral findings converged with neural (fMRI, Experiment 2) responses in the anterior insula during the expression phase. Reflecting the dynamic process of learning, amygdala activation in response to predictive threat cues displayed a linear decrease across trials. Interestingly, BOLD responses to others' pain that was predictable, were enhanced within the amygdala, insula and hippocampus, compared to unpredictable conditions. Our findings suggest that humans can learn to resolve temporal threat uncertainty, through the observation of others. The present work thereby contributes to understanding the social aspects of fear and anxiety disorders.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.