Belowground carbon use in woody plants under experimental warming: uneven evidence for fine-root, root-exudation, and mycorrhizal responses.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Shuming Peng, Licheng Ji, Xuyang Lu, Baoli Duan
{"title":"Belowground carbon use in woody plants under experimental warming: uneven evidence for fine-root, root-exudation, and mycorrhizal responses.","authors":"Shuming Peng, Licheng Ji, Xuyang Lu, Baoli Duan","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpag142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How warming changes belowground carbon use in woody plants remains poorly understood. Most experiments measure fine-root, root-exudation, and mycorrhizal responses separately, providing limited evidence on how these responses vary together within the same experiment. We synthesized 13 primary publications from 11 independent experiments: eight field, one outdoor pot, and two controlled experiments. Our synthesis showed no significant increase in fine-root biomass or production. Root respiration, mortality, and N concentration increased, whereas root P and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations decreased. Root-exudation measurements were reported differently across studies, limiting direct comparisons. Root-exudation responses also varied with nutrient treatment, season, and warming duration, while exudate quantity and composition did not always change together. Most mycorrhizal studies measured colonization or infection rather than direct plant-fungal carbon and nutrient exchange. Among the mycorrhizal studies included here, an isotope-based C-for-N ratio proxy varied with N source and sampling time. When multiple belowground responses were measured within the same experiment, concurrent increases in fine-root activity, root exudation, and mycorrhizal association occurred only under particular nutrient and temporal conditions and were not a general response to warming. Opposing responses did not demonstrate compensation; no study showed that an increase in one pathway offset a decrease in another in terms of nutrient acquisition or plant performance. Testing whether warming reallocates carbon among fine roots, root exudation, and mycorrhizal fungi will require coordinated measurements of carbon supply, comparable belowground carbon fluxes, plant nutrient acquisition, and competing carbon sinks within the same experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpag142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How warming changes belowground carbon use in woody plants remains poorly understood. Most experiments measure fine-root, root-exudation, and mycorrhizal responses separately, providing limited evidence on how these responses vary together within the same experiment. We synthesized 13 primary publications from 11 independent experiments: eight field, one outdoor pot, and two controlled experiments. Our synthesis showed no significant increase in fine-root biomass or production. Root respiration, mortality, and N concentration increased, whereas root P and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations decreased. Root-exudation measurements were reported differently across studies, limiting direct comparisons. Root-exudation responses also varied with nutrient treatment, season, and warming duration, while exudate quantity and composition did not always change together. Most mycorrhizal studies measured colonization or infection rather than direct plant-fungal carbon and nutrient exchange. Among the mycorrhizal studies included here, an isotope-based C-for-N ratio proxy varied with N source and sampling time. When multiple belowground responses were measured within the same experiment, concurrent increases in fine-root activity, root exudation, and mycorrhizal association occurred only under particular nutrient and temporal conditions and were not a general response to warming. Opposing responses did not demonstrate compensation; no study showed that an increase in one pathway offset a decrease in another in terms of nutrient acquisition or plant performance. Testing whether warming reallocates carbon among fine roots, root exudation, and mycorrhizal fungi will require coordinated measurements of carbon supply, comparable belowground carbon fluxes, plant nutrient acquisition, and competing carbon sinks within the same experiment.

实验变暖条件下木本植物的地下碳利用:细根、根渗出和菌根响应的证据不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书