Factors Associated with Intention to Be Vaccinated Against Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Health Belief Model Constructs in Serbia.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2026-09-01 DOI:10.3390/vaccines14090763
Larisa Vujnovic, Biljana Kilibarda, Sofija Jovanovic, Dragana Dimitrijevic, Milunka Milinkovic, Zoran Bukumiric, Verica Jovanovic
{"title":"Factors Associated with Intention to Be Vaccinated Against Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Health Belief Model Constructs in Serbia.","authors":"Larisa Vujnovic, Biljana Kilibarda, Sofija Jovanovic, Dragana Dimitrijevic, Milunka Milinkovic, Zoran Bukumiric, Verica Jovanovic","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14090763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> As seasonal influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Serbia remains suboptimal, we aimed to identify HCW beliefs associated with their intention to receive seasonal influenza vaccine (\"vaccination intention\") in the season 2024/2025. <b>Methods:</b> In a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2024, healthcare institutions were selected from a national registry, using multi-stage sampling stratified by geographical region and healthcare level. All consenting HCWs present on the survey day self-completed questionnaires. Five dichotomised Health Belief Model constructs were assessed: perceived susceptibility to influenza, perceived disease severity, perceived vaccination benefits, perceived physical and psychological barriers, and perceived cues for action (recommendation by another HCW, someone close, or a supervisor). The association of vaccination intention (yes/no/undecided) with Health Belief Model constructs, demographic and occupational factors were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> Of 1919 respondents, 30% declared positive vaccination intention, 52.5% no intention, and 17.5% were undecided. Compared with no intention, positive vaccination intention was associated with perceived self-benefit (aOR = 6.22, CI = 3.49-11.08), perceived patient benefit (aOR = 2.26, CI = 1.48-3.45), perceived susceptibility (aOR = 3.26, CI = 2.19-4.86), and perceived vaccine safety (aOR = 2.95, CI = 1.93-4.50). Participants were more likely to be undecided than reject vaccination if they experienced higher perceived susceptibility (aOR = 2.93, CI = 1.89-4.54), perceived influenza as severe (aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.30-3.21), perceived patient benefits (aOR = 1.77, CI = 1.14-2.74), or recalled receiving a recommendation from another HCW (aOR = 2.63, CI = 1.17-5.85). <b>Conclusions:</b> HCWs' positive vaccination intention was associated with beliefs relevant for personal health and patient benefits. The undecided group showed a distinct pattern of beliefs warranting their separate analysis and specific approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13611065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14090763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As seasonal influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Serbia remains suboptimal, we aimed to identify HCW beliefs associated with their intention to receive seasonal influenza vaccine ("vaccination intention") in the season 2024/2025. Methods: In a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2024, healthcare institutions were selected from a national registry, using multi-stage sampling stratified by geographical region and healthcare level. All consenting HCWs present on the survey day self-completed questionnaires. Five dichotomised Health Belief Model constructs were assessed: perceived susceptibility to influenza, perceived disease severity, perceived vaccination benefits, perceived physical and psychological barriers, and perceived cues for action (recommendation by another HCW, someone close, or a supervisor). The association of vaccination intention (yes/no/undecided) with Health Belief Model constructs, demographic and occupational factors were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: Of 1919 respondents, 30% declared positive vaccination intention, 52.5% no intention, and 17.5% were undecided. Compared with no intention, positive vaccination intention was associated with perceived self-benefit (aOR = 6.22, CI = 3.49-11.08), perceived patient benefit (aOR = 2.26, CI = 1.48-3.45), perceived susceptibility (aOR = 3.26, CI = 2.19-4.86), and perceived vaccine safety (aOR = 2.95, CI = 1.93-4.50). Participants were more likely to be undecided than reject vaccination if they experienced higher perceived susceptibility (aOR = 2.93, CI = 1.89-4.54), perceived influenza as severe (aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.30-3.21), perceived patient benefits (aOR = 1.77, CI = 1.14-2.74), or recalled receiving a recommendation from another HCW (aOR = 2.63, CI = 1.17-5.85). Conclusions: HCWs' positive vaccination intention was associated with beliefs relevant for personal health and patient benefits. The undecided group showed a distinct pattern of beliefs warranting their separate analysis and specific approaches.

与卫生保健工作者接种季节性流感疫苗意向相关的因素:一项评估塞尔维亚健康信念模型构建的横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书