Assessing the performance of remotely sensed functional traits and spectral metrics for estimating multidimensional plant diversity in wetlands using UAV data.
Long Ren, Zhaoju Zheng, Paolo Villa, Ping Zhao, Cong Xu, Ying Fu, Zhaofu Zhou, Jinchen Wu, Xinsheng Zhao, Wei Li, Hui Lu, Sufan Liu, Dan Zhao, Yuan Zeng
{"title":"Assessing the performance of remotely sensed functional traits and spectral metrics for estimating multidimensional plant diversity in wetlands using UAV data.","authors":"Long Ren, Zhaoju Zheng, Paolo Villa, Ping Zhao, Cong Xu, Ying Fu, Zhaofu Zhou, Jinchen Wu, Xinsheng Zhao, Wei Li, Hui Lu, Sufan Liu, Dan Zhao, Yuan Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2026.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant diversity underpins wetland ecosystem stability and functional sustainability, and its reliable assessment is vital for effective conservation and management. Remote sensing provides an efficient mean of plant diversity monitoring, however the potential of remotely sensed functional traits (RS-traits) and spectral metrics for plant diversity estimation in wetland ecosystems has not been fully investigated. In this study, we integrated UAV hyperspectral and LiDAR data to extract spectral band metrics, Rao's quadratic entropy and principal components, texture features, and retrieve physiological and morphological RS-traits. We then used these features to predict multi-dimensional (species, functional, and phylogenetic) plant diversity using multiple stepwise regression (MSR), generalized additive models (GAMs), and random forest regression (RF). The results demonstrated that the retrieved RS-traits were generally consistent with field measurements (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.36-0.78 for physiological, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.47-0.87 for morphological traits). Among the different models, MSR performed best for species diversity, GAMs for functional diversity, and RF for phylogenetic diversity. The highest predictive performance was achieved for species diversity (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> = 0.62-0.73), followed by functional (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> = 0.41-0.83) and phylogenetic diversity (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> = 0.55-0.64). Models based on RS-traits consistently performed better than those based on spectral metrics, while combining spectral metrics and RS-traits did not lead to statistically significant improvements. While our results provide preliminary evidence towards a unified RS-trait framework for the multi-dimensional monitoring of wetland plant diversity, further work is needed to generalise these findings to other sites and wetland types.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"48 5","pages":"1023-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2026.04.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plant diversity underpins wetland ecosystem stability and functional sustainability, and its reliable assessment is vital for effective conservation and management. Remote sensing provides an efficient mean of plant diversity monitoring, however the potential of remotely sensed functional traits (RS-traits) and spectral metrics for plant diversity estimation in wetland ecosystems has not been fully investigated. In this study, we integrated UAV hyperspectral and LiDAR data to extract spectral band metrics, Rao's quadratic entropy and principal components, texture features, and retrieve physiological and morphological RS-traits. We then used these features to predict multi-dimensional (species, functional, and phylogenetic) plant diversity using multiple stepwise regression (MSR), generalized additive models (GAMs), and random forest regression (RF). The results demonstrated that the retrieved RS-traits were generally consistent with field measurements (R2 = 0.36-0.78 for physiological, R2 = 0.47-0.87 for morphological traits). Among the different models, MSR performed best for species diversity, GAMs for functional diversity, and RF for phylogenetic diversity. The highest predictive performance was achieved for species diversity (R2adj = 0.62-0.73), followed by functional (R2adj = 0.41-0.83) and phylogenetic diversity (R2adj = 0.55-0.64). Models based on RS-traits consistently performed better than those based on spectral metrics, while combining spectral metrics and RS-traits did not lead to statistically significant improvements. While our results provide preliminary evidence towards a unified RS-trait framework for the multi-dimensional monitoring of wetland plant diversity, further work is needed to generalise these findings to other sites and wetland types.
Plant DiversityAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that
advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants,
contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications,
present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists.
While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance.
Fields covered by the journal include:
plant systematics and taxonomy-
evolutionary developmental biology-
reproductive biology-
phylo- and biogeography-
evolutionary ecology-
population biology-
conservation biology-
palaeobotany-
molecular evolution-
comparative and evolutionary genomics-
physiology-
biochemistry