Symptom network analysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a multicenter study.

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2026-09-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.21741
Xiaorong Liu, Huifen Zhao, Ziqing Hong, Yumei Peng, Jianqing Zheng, Suzhen Xie, Shuifeng Chen
{"title":"Symptom network analysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a multicenter study.","authors":"Xiaorong Liu, Huifen Zhao, Ziqing Hong, Yumei Peng, Jianqing Zheng, Suzhen Xie, Shuifeng Chen","doi":"10.7717/peerj.21741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify symptom clusters and construct a symptom network in multicenter maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, with the aim of elucidating core symptoms and informing evidence-based symptom management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling to recruit 502 MHD patients from 10 hemodialysis centers in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China. Symptom burden was assessed using the Dialysis Symptom Index. Exploratory factor analysis was employed to identify symptom clusters. Network analysis was performed using R software (version 4.3.1), with the qgraph, bootnet, and network tools packages utilized for network visualization, stability analysis, and centrality estimation. Network centrality indices were calculated, and strength centrality-which demonstrated adequate stability-was used as the primary index to identify core symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed five distinct symptom clusters: emotional symptoms, fluid and electrolyte imbalance symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, uremic toxins symptoms, and sleep disturbance symptoms. Network analysis demonstrated that muscle cramps exhibited the highest strength centrality (1.758), followed by nervousness (1.332) and worrying (1.238), identifying muscle cramps as the most central symptom within the network structure. The correlation stability (CS) coefficient of strength centrality was 0.749, indicating adequate stability, whereas closeness and betweenness centralities were unstable (CS-coefficient = 0.00) and were therefore not interpreted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MHD patients experience multiple co-occurring symptom clusters, with muscle cramps identified as the most central symptom in the symptom network and fatigue representing the most severe and second most prevalent symptom. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing interventions targeting muscle cramps, fatigue, and other high-strength symptoms. Healthcare professionals should develop tailored, symptom-specific management strategies to effectively alleviate symptom burden and enhance clinical outcomes in MHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"14 ","pages":"e21741"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify symptom clusters and construct a symptom network in multicenter maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, with the aim of elucidating core symptoms and informing evidence-based symptom management strategies.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling to recruit 502 MHD patients from 10 hemodialysis centers in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China. Symptom burden was assessed using the Dialysis Symptom Index. Exploratory factor analysis was employed to identify symptom clusters. Network analysis was performed using R software (version 4.3.1), with the qgraph, bootnet, and network tools packages utilized for network visualization, stability analysis, and centrality estimation. Network centrality indices were calculated, and strength centrality-which demonstrated adequate stability-was used as the primary index to identify core symptoms.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed five distinct symptom clusters: emotional symptoms, fluid and electrolyte imbalance symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, uremic toxins symptoms, and sleep disturbance symptoms. Network analysis demonstrated that muscle cramps exhibited the highest strength centrality (1.758), followed by nervousness (1.332) and worrying (1.238), identifying muscle cramps as the most central symptom within the network structure. The correlation stability (CS) coefficient of strength centrality was 0.749, indicating adequate stability, whereas closeness and betweenness centralities were unstable (CS-coefficient = 0.00) and were therefore not interpreted.

Conclusion: MHD patients experience multiple co-occurring symptom clusters, with muscle cramps identified as the most central symptom in the symptom network and fatigue representing the most severe and second most prevalent symptom. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing interventions targeting muscle cramps, fatigue, and other high-strength symptoms. Healthcare professionals should develop tailored, symptom-specific management strategies to effectively alleviate symptom burden and enhance clinical outcomes in MHD patients.

维持性血液透析患者的症状网络分析:一项多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书