Pharmacokinetic Relevance of In Vitro Skin Models: Absorption, Cutaneous Distribution, Metabolism, and Clearance-like Removal in Dermal and Transdermal Drug Testing.

IF 6.9 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Filip Dugonik, Urška Jeršič, Lejla Kač, Uroš Maver, Tina Maver
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Relevance of In Vitro Skin Models: Absorption, Cutaneous Distribution, Metabolism, and Clearance-like Removal in Dermal and Transdermal Drug Testing.","authors":"Filip Dugonik, Urška Jeršič, Lejla Kač, Uroš Maver, Tina Maver","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics18091152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: In vitro skin models are widely used in dermal and transdermal drug development, yet their pharmacokinetic interpretation often remains endpoint-dependent and does not fully capture cutaneous disposition, including partitioning, local metabolism, or clearance-like removal. This review evaluates the utility of these models through a comprehensive pharmacokinetic process framework. <b>Methods</b>: Using a structured literature search, we critically compared data from studies utilizing a range of in vitro skin models, including synthetic membranes, ex vivo human skin, reconstructed human epidermis, full-thickness equivalents, and advanced bioprinted or microfluidic platforms. The assessment focused on model performance across the key processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. <b>Results</b>: Our analysis reveals that alternative barriers exhibit no uniform direction of bias relative to human skin; model rank order varies with compound, formulation, and dose, so that the available evidence does not currently support a single universal scaling relationship, although calibration within a defined applicability domain may remain possible. Synthetic membranes provide reproducible platforms for formulation ranking but lack biological retention and metabolism. Ex vivo human skin remains the closest reference for permeation and mass balance, though donor variability and storage sensitivity limit standardization. Reconstructed epidermis supports standardized permeation and epidermal targeting, while full-thickness equivalents permit dermal retention analysis. Advanced perfused constructs extend experimental capabilities, but their predictive performance remains largely uncharacterized. <b>Conclusions</b>: No single model universally replicates human pharmacokinetics. Model selection must therefore be carefully aligned with the specific pharmacokinetic process of interest, the model's biological capacity, and the intended context of use to ensure clinically relevant data interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19894,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13610528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In vitro skin models are widely used in dermal and transdermal drug development, yet their pharmacokinetic interpretation often remains endpoint-dependent and does not fully capture cutaneous disposition, including partitioning, local metabolism, or clearance-like removal. This review evaluates the utility of these models through a comprehensive pharmacokinetic process framework. Methods: Using a structured literature search, we critically compared data from studies utilizing a range of in vitro skin models, including synthetic membranes, ex vivo human skin, reconstructed human epidermis, full-thickness equivalents, and advanced bioprinted or microfluidic platforms. The assessment focused on model performance across the key processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. Results: Our analysis reveals that alternative barriers exhibit no uniform direction of bias relative to human skin; model rank order varies with compound, formulation, and dose, so that the available evidence does not currently support a single universal scaling relationship, although calibration within a defined applicability domain may remain possible. Synthetic membranes provide reproducible platforms for formulation ranking but lack biological retention and metabolism. Ex vivo human skin remains the closest reference for permeation and mass balance, though donor variability and storage sensitivity limit standardization. Reconstructed epidermis supports standardized permeation and epidermal targeting, while full-thickness equivalents permit dermal retention analysis. Advanced perfused constructs extend experimental capabilities, but their predictive performance remains largely uncharacterized. Conclusions: No single model universally replicates human pharmacokinetics. Model selection must therefore be carefully aligned with the specific pharmacokinetic process of interest, the model's biological capacity, and the intended context of use to ensure clinically relevant data interpretation.

体外皮肤模型的药代动力学相关性:皮肤和透皮药物试验中的吸收、皮肤分布、代谢和清除样去除。
背景:体外皮肤模型广泛用于真皮和透皮药物开发,但其药代动力学解释往往依赖于终点,不能完全捕获皮肤处置,包括分配、局部代谢或清除样去除。这篇综述通过一个全面的药代动力学过程框架来评估这些模型的效用。方法:通过结构化的文献检索,我们严格比较了使用一系列体外皮肤模型的研究数据,包括合成膜、离体人皮肤、重建人表皮、全层等效物和先进的生物打印或微流体平台。评估的重点是模型在吸收、分布、代谢和消除等关键过程中的表现。结果:我们的分析表明,替代屏障相对于人类皮肤没有统一的偏倚方向;模型等级顺序因化合物、配方和剂量而异,因此现有证据目前不支持单一的通用标度关系,尽管在确定的适用范围内进行校准仍然是可能的。合成膜为配方排序提供了可重复的平台,但缺乏生物保留和代谢。离体人体皮肤仍然是渗透和质量平衡的最接近参考,尽管供体的可变性和储存敏感性限制了标准化。重建的表皮支持标准化渗透和表皮靶向,而全层等效物允许皮肤保留分析。先进的灌注结构扩展了实验能力,但其预测性能在很大程度上仍未表征。结论:没有单一模型能完全复制人体药代动力学。因此,模型选择必须仔细地与感兴趣的特定药代动力学过程、模型的生物学能力和预期使用环境相一致,以确保临床相关数据的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutics
Pharmaceutics Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
16.41 days
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications,  and short notes. Covered topics include pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, and pharmaceutical formulation. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical details in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书