Yi Hu, Xiao Guo, Zhenwei Xu, Jingfeng Wang, Ruiqi Sun, Mingyan Li, Pengcheng Zhu, Karin M Kettenring, Hana Skálová, Weihua Guo
{"title":"Invasive plant richness and abundance synergistically amplify co-invasion success: Experimental evidence for invasional meltdown.","authors":"Yi Hu, Xiao Guo, Zhenwei Xu, Jingfeng Wang, Ruiqi Sun, Mingyan Li, Pengcheng Zhu, Karin M Kettenring, Hana Skálová, Weihua Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2026.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Co-invasion by multiple invasive species is becoming increasingly prevalent, yet the role of interactions among invasive species in shaping invasion success remains poorly understood. While invader abundance is known to facilitate establishment, the combined effects of invasive plant richness and abundance on invasion outcomes have rarely been tested experimentally. We established a fully factorial mesocosm experiment manipulating four levels of invasive plant richness (0, 1, 2, or 3 species) and abundance (0, 12, 24, 48 individuals) using three Asteraceae invaders-<i>Erigeron canadensis</i>, <i>Erigeron annuus</i>, and <i>Bidens pilosa</i>-within native plant communities. We found facilitative and neutral interactions among invaders generated non-additive (reversal) negative effects on native biomass, which intensified with increasing invader richness. Higher richness facilitated invasion success by modifying selection effects among invasive species-primarily through size-mediated mechanisms-that enhanced invasive biomass and strengthened suppression of native plants. Invasive richness altered soil nitrogen pools without promoting invasion success, but was associated with changes in soil microbial biomass carbon and litter decomposition that coincided with reduced native performance. Elevated invader abundance further promoted invasion success and interacted synergistically with richness to amplify invasion impacts, indicating that co-invasion severity may intensify under future scenarios of increasing propagule pressure. Overall, our findings provide experimental evidence for the invasional meltdown hypothesis and demonstrate how invasive plant richness and abundance jointly enhance invasion success. Our results further suggest that early management targeting low-abundance invaders may disrupt the synergistic effect between invasive plant richness and abundance and mitigate the impacts of multispecies co-invasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"48 5","pages":"915-926"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2026.03.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Co-invasion by multiple invasive species is becoming increasingly prevalent, yet the role of interactions among invasive species in shaping invasion success remains poorly understood. While invader abundance is known to facilitate establishment, the combined effects of invasive plant richness and abundance on invasion outcomes have rarely been tested experimentally. We established a fully factorial mesocosm experiment manipulating four levels of invasive plant richness (0, 1, 2, or 3 species) and abundance (0, 12, 24, 48 individuals) using three Asteraceae invaders-Erigeron canadensis, Erigeron annuus, and Bidens pilosa-within native plant communities. We found facilitative and neutral interactions among invaders generated non-additive (reversal) negative effects on native biomass, which intensified with increasing invader richness. Higher richness facilitated invasion success by modifying selection effects among invasive species-primarily through size-mediated mechanisms-that enhanced invasive biomass and strengthened suppression of native plants. Invasive richness altered soil nitrogen pools without promoting invasion success, but was associated with changes in soil microbial biomass carbon and litter decomposition that coincided with reduced native performance. Elevated invader abundance further promoted invasion success and interacted synergistically with richness to amplify invasion impacts, indicating that co-invasion severity may intensify under future scenarios of increasing propagule pressure. Overall, our findings provide experimental evidence for the invasional meltdown hypothesis and demonstrate how invasive plant richness and abundance jointly enhance invasion success. Our results further suggest that early management targeting low-abundance invaders may disrupt the synergistic effect between invasive plant richness and abundance and mitigate the impacts of multispecies co-invasion.
Plant DiversityAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that
advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants,
contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications,
present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists.
While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance.
Fields covered by the journal include:
plant systematics and taxonomy-
evolutionary developmental biology-
reproductive biology-
phylo- and biogeography-
evolutionary ecology-
population biology-
conservation biology-
palaeobotany-
molecular evolution-
comparative and evolutionary genomics-
physiology-
biochemistry