Blood-based biomarkers in the anti-amyloid era of Alzheimer's disease: clinical utility, implementation challenges, and future directions.

IF 2.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bo-Lin Ho, Yuan-Han Yang
{"title":"Blood-based biomarkers in the anti-amyloid era of Alzheimer's disease: clinical utility, implementation challenges, and future directions.","authors":"Bo-Lin Ho, Yuan-Han Yang","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2026.2734618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of disease-modifying anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease remains constrained by the cost and procedural burden of positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid testing. This review evaluates blood-based biomarkers in therapeutic pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><b>PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched for literature published from January 2018 onward, with earlier landmark studies included when relevant</b>. Evidence was synthesized on plasma biomarkers in treatment eligibility, biological staging, longitudinal monitoring, therapeutic response, and risk stratification for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among assays, plasma p-tau217 consistently demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting cortical amyloid pathology across clinical settings. The plasma p-tau217/Aβ1-42 ratio is the first blood-based assay cleared by the FDA to identify amyloid pathology, supporting clinical triage. Complementary biomarkers, including plasma Aβ42/40, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain, <b>reflect</b> amyloid burden, astroglial activation, and neurodegeneration. Clinical adoption remains limited by inter-assay variability, inconsistent diagnostic thresholds, and the lack of surrogate endpoints for treatment monitoring and adverse-event assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood-based biomarkers are best incorporated into structured, stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks rather than replacing established reference standards. Progress will require assay harmonization, prospective validation, and interpretable biomarker-guided care pathways to support scalable, safe implementation of disease-modifying therapies in routine dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2026.2734618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementation of disease-modifying anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease remains constrained by the cost and procedural burden of positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid testing. This review evaluates blood-based biomarkers in therapeutic pathways.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched for literature published from January 2018 onward, with earlier landmark studies included when relevant. Evidence was synthesized on plasma biomarkers in treatment eligibility, biological staging, longitudinal monitoring, therapeutic response, and risk stratification for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.

Results: Among assays, plasma p-tau217 consistently demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting cortical amyloid pathology across clinical settings. The plasma p-tau217/Aβ1-42 ratio is the first blood-based assay cleared by the FDA to identify amyloid pathology, supporting clinical triage. Complementary biomarkers, including plasma Aβ42/40, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain, reflect amyloid burden, astroglial activation, and neurodegeneration. Clinical adoption remains limited by inter-assay variability, inconsistent diagnostic thresholds, and the lack of surrogate endpoints for treatment monitoring and adverse-event assessment.

Conclusions: Blood-based biomarkers are best incorporated into structured, stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks rather than replacing established reference standards. Progress will require assay harmonization, prospective validation, and interpretable biomarker-guided care pathways to support scalable, safe implementation of disease-modifying therapies in routine dementia care.

阿尔茨海默病抗淀粉样蛋白时代的血液生物标志物:临床应用、实施挑战和未来方向
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书