Paired In Vitro Susceptibility of Cefiderocol and Colistin in Colistin-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Single-Centre, MIC-Based Analysis of 236 Clinical Isolates.

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Elena Hogea, Nicolae Ciprian Pilut, Felix Bratosin, Andra-Nicole Rusnac, Oana Plavitu, Livia Stanga, Horia Silviu Branea
{"title":"Paired In Vitro Susceptibility of Cefiderocol and Colistin in Colistin-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Single-Centre, MIC-Based Analysis of 236 Clinical Isolates.","authors":"Elena Hogea, Nicolae Ciprian Pilut, Felix Bratosin, Andra-Nicole Rusnac, Oana Plavitu, Livia Stanga, Horia Silviu Branea","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms14092071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli increasingly exhaust therapeutic options, leaving colistin and cefiderocol as last-resort agents. We assessed whether cefiderocol retains in vitro activity against colistin-resistant isolates, without inferring clinical efficacy. We analysed 236 non-duplicate XDR Gram-negative isolates from 220 patients. Cefiderocol and colistin MICs were determined via reference broth microdilution with EUCAST-required quality control (iron-depleted broth for cefiderocol; <i>mcr-1</i>-positive <i>Escherichia coli</i> NCTC 13846 for colistin) and interpreted using species-specific EUCAST v16.1 (2026) breakpoints (cefiderocol: Enterobacterales S ≤ 2, I 4, R > 4 mg/L; <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> S ≤ 2, R > 2 mg/L; colistin: <i>P. aeruginosa</i> S ≤ 4 mg/L). Because EUCAST publishes no clinical cefiderocol breakpoint for <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, the primary analysis comprised species with breakpoints for both agents (<i>n</i> = 150; 126 paired); <i>A. baumannii</i> is reported as an MIC distribution and the pooled 236-isolate comparison as secondary. In the primary analysis, 120/150 isolates (80.0%) were cefiderocol-susceptible at standard or increased exposure. Among paired isolates, cefiderocol covered 77.0% versus 43.7% for colistin; agreement was negligible (Cohen's κ = 0.020), with 54 isolates favouring cefiderocol and 12 the reverse (McNemar <i>p</i> < 0.001). Conditional in vitro susceptibility among 71 colistin-resistant isolates was 76.1% (95% CI 65.0-84.5), giving 33.3 percentage points of incremental coverage and one additional cefiderocol-susceptible isolate per 2.3 matched isolates tested. Secondary analyses were directionally consistent (incremental coverage 21.8-33.3 points). These in vitro findings support paired testing of both agents to identify isolates retaining cefiderocol activity when colistin does not; clinical benefit was not assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13609237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14092071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli increasingly exhaust therapeutic options, leaving colistin and cefiderocol as last-resort agents. We assessed whether cefiderocol retains in vitro activity against colistin-resistant isolates, without inferring clinical efficacy. We analysed 236 non-duplicate XDR Gram-negative isolates from 220 patients. Cefiderocol and colistin MICs were determined via reference broth microdilution with EUCAST-required quality control (iron-depleted broth for cefiderocol; mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 for colistin) and interpreted using species-specific EUCAST v16.1 (2026) breakpoints (cefiderocol: Enterobacterales S ≤ 2, I 4, R > 4 mg/L; Pseudomonas aeruginosa S ≤ 2, R > 2 mg/L; colistin: P. aeruginosa S ≤ 4 mg/L). Because EUCAST publishes no clinical cefiderocol breakpoint for Acinetobacter baumannii, the primary analysis comprised species with breakpoints for both agents (n = 150; 126 paired); A. baumannii is reported as an MIC distribution and the pooled 236-isolate comparison as secondary. In the primary analysis, 120/150 isolates (80.0%) were cefiderocol-susceptible at standard or increased exposure. Among paired isolates, cefiderocol covered 77.0% versus 43.7% for colistin; agreement was negligible (Cohen's κ = 0.020), with 54 isolates favouring cefiderocol and 12 the reverse (McNemar p < 0.001). Conditional in vitro susceptibility among 71 colistin-resistant isolates was 76.1% (95% CI 65.0-84.5), giving 33.3 percentage points of incremental coverage and one additional cefiderocol-susceptible isolate per 2.3 matched isolates tested. Secondary analyses were directionally consistent (incremental coverage 21.8-33.3 points). These in vitro findings support paired testing of both agents to identify isolates retaining cefiderocol activity when colistin does not; clinical benefit was not assessed.

头孢地罗和粘菌素对粘菌素耐药和广泛耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌的体外配对敏感性:236株临床分离株的单中心、mic分析
广泛耐药(XDR)革兰氏阴性杆菌日益耗尽治疗选择,使粘菌素和头孢地罗成为最后的手段。我们评估了头孢地罗是否保留了对粘菌素耐药菌株的体外活性,但没有推断临床疗效。我们分析了来自220例患者的236株非重复XDR革兰氏阴性菌株。Cefiderocol和粘菌素mic采用EUCAST要求的质量控制标准(Cefiderocol为缺铁肉汤;mcr-1阳性大肠杆菌NCTC 13846为粘菌素),通过EUCAST v16.1(2026)断点(Cefiderocol: Enterobacterales S≤2,i4, r> 4 mg/L;铜绿假单胞菌S≤2,r> 2 mg/L;粘菌素:P. aeruginosa S≤4 mg/L)进行微量稀释测定。由于EUCAST没有公布鲍曼不动杆菌头孢地罗的临床断点,因此主要分析包括两种药物都有断点的物种(n = 150; 126对);鲍曼不动杆菌被报道为MIC分布,合并的236株比较是次要的。在初步分析中,120/150株(80.0%)在标准暴露或增加暴露时对头孢醚敏感。配对分离株中,头孢地罗占77.0%,粘菌素占43.7%;一致性可以忽略不计(Cohen’s κ = 0.020), 54株菌株倾向于头孢地罗,12株相反(McNemar p < 0.001)。71株粘菌素耐药菌株的体外条件敏感性为76.1% (95% CI为65.0-84.5),覆盖范围增加33.3个百分点,每2.3株匹配的检测菌株中增加1株头孢地冷敏感菌株。二次分析方向一致(增量覆盖21.8-33.3点)。这些体外研究结果支持对这两种药物进行配对试验,以确定在粘菌素不具有头孢地罗活性的情况下保留头孢地罗活性的分离株;临床获益未进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书