The Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Function on Inhaler Device Adaptability in Stable COPD Patients.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yanwen Zheng, Jing Wang, Haiyan Wu
{"title":"The Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Function on Inhaler Device Adaptability in Stable COPD Patients.","authors":"Yanwen Zheng, Jing Wang, Haiyan Wu","doi":"10.1177/19412711261490198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the relationship between inspiratory muscle function and inhaler device adaptability in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, addressing the gaps in objective evaluation methods for inhaler device effectiveness in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 701 stable COPD patients (498 males, 203 females; aged 48-83 years) from the First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District was conducted from June 2023 to May 2024. Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) measured respiratory muscle function, while average effective inspiratory flow assessed inhaler adaptability. Participants used either dry powder inhalers (DPI) or pressurized metered-dose inhalers/soft mist inhalers (pMDI/SMI). Multiple regression models adjusted for demographic and respiratory parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher MIP quartiles correlated with increased average effective inspiratory flow (Q4 vs. Q1: β = 8.1 L/min, 95% CI: 5.1-11.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) after adjusting for demographic factors. This association diminished after controlling for respiratory parameters, suggesting MIP indirectly affects inhaler adaptability through intermediate respiratory metrics. A potential threshold effect was identified at MIP of 23.1 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, though not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.208).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that inspiratory muscle function, as assessed by MIP, is significantly associated with measures of inhaler device adaptability, and identifies a physiologically relevant threshold range that may help characterize patient requirements for inhalers of differing resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"19412711261490198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711261490198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the relationship between inspiratory muscle function and inhaler device adaptability in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, addressing the gaps in objective evaluation methods for inhaler device effectiveness in clinical practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 701 stable COPD patients (498 males, 203 females; aged 48-83 years) from the First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District was conducted from June 2023 to May 2024. Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) measured respiratory muscle function, while average effective inspiratory flow assessed inhaler adaptability. Participants used either dry powder inhalers (DPI) or pressurized metered-dose inhalers/soft mist inhalers (pMDI/SMI). Multiple regression models adjusted for demographic and respiratory parameters.

Results: Higher MIP quartiles correlated with increased average effective inspiratory flow (Q4 vs. Q1: β = 8.1 L/min, 95% CI: 5.1-11.0, p < 0.001) after adjusting for demographic factors. This association diminished after controlling for respiratory parameters, suggesting MIP indirectly affects inhaler adaptability through intermediate respiratory metrics. A potential threshold effect was identified at MIP of 23.1 cmH2O, though not statistically significant (p = 0.208).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that inspiratory muscle function, as assessed by MIP, is significantly associated with measures of inhaler device adaptability, and identifies a physiologically relevant threshold range that may help characterize patient requirements for inhalers of differing resistance.

稳定期COPD患者吸气肌功能对吸入器适应性的影响。
目的:探讨稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸气肌功能与吸入器适应性的关系,解决临床中吸入器有效性客观评价方法的空白。方法:对2023年6月至2024年5月萧山区第一人民医院701例稳定期COPD患者(男性498例,女性203例,年龄48 ~ 83岁)进行横断面研究。最大吸气压力(MIP)测量呼吸肌功能,而平均有效吸气流量评估吸入器适应性。参与者使用干粉吸入器(DPI)或加压计量吸入器/软雾吸入器(pMDI/SMI)。根据人口统计学和呼吸参数调整的多元回归模型。结果:在调整人口统计学因素后,较高的MIP四分位数与平均有效吸气流量增加相关(Q4 vs. Q1: β = 8.1 L/min, 95% CI: 5.1-11.0, p < 0.001)。在控制呼吸参数后,这种关联减弱,表明MIP通过中间呼吸指标间接影响吸入器适应性。MIP为23.1 cmH2O时存在潜在阈值效应,但无统计学意义(p = 0.208)。结论:我们的研究表明,通过MIP评估的吸气肌功能与吸入器装置适应性的测量显着相关,并确定了生理上相关的阈值范围,这可能有助于表征患者对不同阻力吸入器的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书