Measuring children's HRQoL via self-reports and parent proxy-reports in the French Enabee 2022 study: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the French KINDL-R questionnaire.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Naomi Benhaddou, Valentina Decio, Yvon Motreff, Nolwenn Regnault, Stéphanie Monnier-Besnard, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Alexandra Rouquette
{"title":"Measuring children's HRQoL via self-reports and parent proxy-reports in the French Enabee 2022 study: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the French KINDL-R questionnaire.","authors":"Naomi Benhaddou, Valentina Decio, Yvon Motreff, Nolwenn Regnault, Stéphanie Monnier-Besnard, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Alexandra Rouquette","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02589-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Child well-being policies require quality data that takes children's perspectives into account, recorded through appropriate, accurate and reliable measurement instruments. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of two versions of the KINDL-R questionnaire used in the 2022 French National Study on Children's Well-being (Enabee) to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in children: a self-report version for elementary school children aged 6-11 (n = 15,114), and a parent-report version for preschool and kindergarten children aged 3-6 (n = 3,785).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the distributions of responses and the correlations between items. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) to assess the fit of first- and second-order factor models. Internal consistency was measured using McDonald's omega. We tested measurement invariance across child's gender, grade, type of school and whether or not they had a chronic illness. We also conducted a known-groups analysis via analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on child's chronic illness, mental health and parental educational attainment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The parent-report version demonstrated satisfactory CFA model fit (CFI = 0.915, TLI = 0.901, RMSEA = 0.072, SRMR = 0.073), supporting dimensional scoring. The acceptable fit of the hierarchical model (CFI = 0.916, TLI = 0.905, RMSEA = 0.073, SRMR = 0.075) provides preliminary support for reporting an overall score. Invariance was confirmed for the child's gender, grade, type of school and chronic illness. This version effectively distinguished between children with chronic illnesses or at least one probable mental health difficulty and healthy peers. However, the self-report version lacked factorial validity and showed poor CFA model fit (CFI = 0.757, TLI = 0.717). The ESEM model provided a detailed assessment of the fitting issues, which were primarily related to the emotional well-being dimension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The parent-report version of the Kiddy-KINDL-R can provide a valid measure of HRQoL for French children aged 3-6 with comparable mean scores across groups. However, the proposed factor structure of the self-report version of the Kid-KINDL-R was not supported, and most subscales showed insufficient internal consistency in elementary school children. Further refinement is thus required. This was the first study to evaluate the psychometric properties of the KINDL-R measure in the French general population. It provided critical, reliable, and unprecedented information about measuring children's HRQoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02589-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Child well-being policies require quality data that takes children's perspectives into account, recorded through appropriate, accurate and reliable measurement instruments. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of two versions of the KINDL-R questionnaire used in the 2022 French National Study on Children's Well-being (Enabee) to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in children: a self-report version for elementary school children aged 6-11 (n = 15,114), and a parent-report version for preschool and kindergarten children aged 3-6 (n = 3,785).

Methods: We examined the distributions of responses and the correlations between items. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) to assess the fit of first- and second-order factor models. Internal consistency was measured using McDonald's omega. We tested measurement invariance across child's gender, grade, type of school and whether or not they had a chronic illness. We also conducted a known-groups analysis via analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on child's chronic illness, mental health and parental educational attainment.

Results: The parent-report version demonstrated satisfactory CFA model fit (CFI = 0.915, TLI = 0.901, RMSEA = 0.072, SRMR = 0.073), supporting dimensional scoring. The acceptable fit of the hierarchical model (CFI = 0.916, TLI = 0.905, RMSEA = 0.073, SRMR = 0.075) provides preliminary support for reporting an overall score. Invariance was confirmed for the child's gender, grade, type of school and chronic illness. This version effectively distinguished between children with chronic illnesses or at least one probable mental health difficulty and healthy peers. However, the self-report version lacked factorial validity and showed poor CFA model fit (CFI = 0.757, TLI = 0.717). The ESEM model provided a detailed assessment of the fitting issues, which were primarily related to the emotional well-being dimension.

Conclusion: The parent-report version of the Kiddy-KINDL-R can provide a valid measure of HRQoL for French children aged 3-6 with comparable mean scores across groups. However, the proposed factor structure of the self-report version of the Kid-KINDL-R was not supported, and most subscales showed insufficient internal consistency in elementary school children. Further refinement is thus required. This was the first study to evaluate the psychometric properties of the KINDL-R measure in the French general population. It provided critical, reliable, and unprecedented information about measuring children's HRQoL.

在法国Enabee 2022研究中,通过自我报告和父母代理报告测量儿童的HRQoL:对两种版本的法国KINDL-R问卷的心理测量特性的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书