Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hydrolyzed type I collagen, and hyaluronic acid in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Future Science OA Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-25 DOI:10.1080/20565623.2026.2722399
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Seyyede Elahe Mousavikhah, Ali Nazari Nodoushan, Amir Hossein Mahdi Kaghazi, Davood Khavari Ardestani, Fatemeh Rahmani, Hojjat Layegh
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hydrolyzed type I collagen, and hyaluronic acid in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Seyyede Elahe Mousavikhah, Ali Nazari Nodoushan, Amir Hossein Mahdi Kaghazi, Davood Khavari Ardestani, Fatemeh Rahmani, Hojjat Layegh","doi":"10.1080/20565623.2026.2722399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-articular therapies are widely used for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but direct comparisons between emerging biomaterials such as hydrolyzed collagen (HC) and established options like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of intra-articular PRP, HC, and HA on pain, stiffness, and functional outcomes in KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, assessor- and statistician-blinded trial, 135 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 KOA were assigned (1:1:1) to receive three ultrasound-guided Intra-articular injections of PRP, HC, or HA at two-week intervals. The primary outcome was change in WOMAC total score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC subscales, VAS pain, and the Lequesne Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-six patients completed follow-up. All groups showed significant improvements (p < 0.001). HA demonstrated greater improvements in some outcome measures at 1 month. PRP and HC demonstrated more sustained improvements than HA during 1 to 6 months follow-ups, although statistically significant between-group differences were limited to selected outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra-articular PRP, HC, and HA improved outcomes in mild to moderate knee OA; PRP and HC showed a trend toward more sustained benefits during 1 to 6 months. Longer-term trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12568,"journal":{"name":"Future Science OA","volume":"12 1","pages":"2722399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Science OA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2026.2722399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intra-articular therapies are widely used for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but direct comparisons between emerging biomaterials such as hydrolyzed collagen (HC) and established options like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are limited.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of intra-articular PRP, HC, and HA on pain, stiffness, and functional outcomes in KOA.

Methods: In this randomized, assessor- and statistician-blinded trial, 135 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 KOA were assigned (1:1:1) to receive three ultrasound-guided Intra-articular injections of PRP, HC, or HA at two-week intervals. The primary outcome was change in WOMAC total score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC subscales, VAS pain, and the Lequesne Index.

Results: One hundred twenty-six patients completed follow-up. All groups showed significant improvements (p < 0.001). HA demonstrated greater improvements in some outcome measures at 1 month. PRP and HC demonstrated more sustained improvements than HA during 1 to 6 months follow-ups, although statistically significant between-group differences were limited to selected outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: Intra-articular PRP, HC, and HA improved outcomes in mild to moderate knee OA; PRP and HC showed a trend toward more sustained benefits during 1 to 6 months. Longer-term trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

超声引导下关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)、水解I型胶原蛋白和透明质酸对膝骨关节炎患者的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验
背景:关节内治疗广泛用于膝骨关节炎(KOA),但新兴生物材料(如水解胶原蛋白(HC))与富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)等现有选择之间的直接比较有限。目的:比较关节内PRP、HC和HA对KOA患者疼痛、僵硬和功能结局的影响。方法:在这项随机、评估和统计盲法试验中,135例Kellgren-Lawrence 2-3级KOA患者被分配(1:1:1),每隔两周接受三次超声引导下关节内注射PRP、HC或HA。主要观察指标为6个月时WOMAC总分的变化。次要结果包括WOMAC量表、VAS疼痛和Lequesne指数。结果:126例患者完成随访。结论:关节内PRP、HC和HA改善了轻度至中度膝关节炎的预后;PRP和HC在1至6个月内表现出更持续的益处趋势。需要更长期的试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future Science OA
Future Science OA MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Science OA is an online, open access, peer-reviewed title from the Future Science Group. The journal covers research and discussion related to advances in biotechnology, medicine and health. The journal embraces the importance of publishing all good-quality research with the potential to further the progress of research in these fields. All original research articles will be considered that are within the journal''s scope, and have been conducted with scientific rigour and research integrity. The journal also features review articles, editorials and perspectives, providing readers with a leading source of commentary and analysis. Submissions of the following article types will be considered: -Research articles -Preliminary communications -Short communications -Methodologies -Trial design articles -Trial results (including early-phase and negative studies) -Reviews -Perspectives -Commentaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书