Explainable Fuzzy Learner Modelling and Learning Analytics for Human-Centered Teacher Decision Support: A Vocational Education Case Study.

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2026-09-20 DOI:10.3390/e28091036
Eleni Papachristou, Christos Troussas, Akrivi Krouska, Christos Papakostas, Cleo Sgouropoulou
{"title":"Explainable Fuzzy Learner Modelling and Learning Analytics for Human-Centered Teacher Decision Support: A Vocational Education Case Study.","authors":"Eleni Papachristou, Christos Troussas, Akrivi Krouska, Christos Papakostas, Cleo Sgouropoulou","doi":"10.3390/e28091036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based educational systems increasingly support personalised learning, adaptive feedback, and learning analytics. However, these capabilities are often addressed separately, with comparatively less attention paid to their integration into interpretable, teacher-facing decision-support frameworks. This study presents the e-Teacher Assistant, a human-centred educational framework that integrates xAPI-style Learning Record Store (LRS) analytics, dynamic learner modelling, Sugeno-type fuzzy inference using interpretable IF-THEN rules, adaptive learning support, and a dual Student Model-Teacher Model architecture. The framework was evaluated during a three-month authentic deployment in a vocational education Computer Networks course involving 117 learners and four educators. Learner evaluation combined a structured questionnaire, open-ended responses, and LRS-based behavioural analytics, while educators evaluated the Teacher Model through a questionnaire and qualitative responses. Learners reported predominantly positive perceptions of the system, including ease of use (92.3%), usefulness of feedback (95.7%), helpful interaction with the AI Assistant (94.9%), support for independent learning (88.0%), and support for educators through learning analytics (87.2-88.0%). Fairness and objectivity were also evaluated positively by 86.3% of learners. All four educators evaluated the Teacher Model positively, and all strongly agreed on its overall usefulness and its support for progress monitoring. Prior familiarity with digital learning tools was significantly associated with evaluations across all seven questionnaire dimensions. LRS analytics further documented learner engagement, repeated assessment activity, and contextual AI use; AI-assisted examination support was recorded in 64.42% of learner-chapter records. Overall, the findings provide initial empirical support for the feasibility of integrating interpretable learner modelling, adaptive AI-assisted support, LRS-based learning analytics, and teacher-facing decision support in an authentic vocational education setting while preserving educator oversight and pedagogical responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13605926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e28091036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based educational systems increasingly support personalised learning, adaptive feedback, and learning analytics. However, these capabilities are often addressed separately, with comparatively less attention paid to their integration into interpretable, teacher-facing decision-support frameworks. This study presents the e-Teacher Assistant, a human-centred educational framework that integrates xAPI-style Learning Record Store (LRS) analytics, dynamic learner modelling, Sugeno-type fuzzy inference using interpretable IF-THEN rules, adaptive learning support, and a dual Student Model-Teacher Model architecture. The framework was evaluated during a three-month authentic deployment in a vocational education Computer Networks course involving 117 learners and four educators. Learner evaluation combined a structured questionnaire, open-ended responses, and LRS-based behavioural analytics, while educators evaluated the Teacher Model through a questionnaire and qualitative responses. Learners reported predominantly positive perceptions of the system, including ease of use (92.3%), usefulness of feedback (95.7%), helpful interaction with the AI Assistant (94.9%), support for independent learning (88.0%), and support for educators through learning analytics (87.2-88.0%). Fairness and objectivity were also evaluated positively by 86.3% of learners. All four educators evaluated the Teacher Model positively, and all strongly agreed on its overall usefulness and its support for progress monitoring. Prior familiarity with digital learning tools was significantly associated with evaluations across all seven questionnaire dimensions. LRS analytics further documented learner engagement, repeated assessment activity, and contextual AI use; AI-assisted examination support was recorded in 64.42% of learner-chapter records. Overall, the findings provide initial empirical support for the feasibility of integrating interpretable learner modelling, adaptive AI-assisted support, LRS-based learning analytics, and teacher-facing decision support in an authentic vocational education setting while preserving educator oversight and pedagogical responsibility.

以人为本的教师决策支持之可解释模糊学习者建模与学习分析:以职业教育为例。
基于人工智能(AI)的教育系统越来越支持个性化学习、自适应反馈和学习分析。然而,这些能力通常是单独处理的,相对较少关注将它们集成到可解释的、面向教师的决策支持框架中。本研究介绍了电子教师助理,这是一个以人为中心的教育框架,它集成了xapi风格的学习记录存储(LRS)分析、动态学习者建模、使用可解释的IF-THEN规则的sugeno型模糊推理、自适应学习支持和双重学生模型-教师模型架构。该框架在职业教育计算机网络课程中进行了为期三个月的实际部署,涉及117名学习者和4名教育者。学习者评估结合了结构化问卷、开放式回答和基于lrs的行为分析,而教育者则通过问卷调查和定性回答来评估教师模型。学习者对该系统的看法主要是积极的,包括易用性(92.3%)、反馈的有用性(95.7%)、与人工智能助手的有益互动(94.9%)、对独立学习的支持(88.0%)以及通过学习分析对教育工作者的支持(87.2-88.0%)。86.3%的学习者对教学的公平性和客观性也有积极评价。所有四位教育工作者都积极评价了教师模式,并且都强烈同意其总体有用性及其对进度监控的支持。先前对数字学习工具的熟悉程度与所有七个问卷维度的评估显着相关。LRS分析进一步记录了学习者参与、重复评估活动和情境人工智能的使用;64.42%的学习者篇章记录记录了人工智能辅助考试支持。总体而言,研究结果为在真实的职业教育环境中整合可解释的学习者建模、自适应人工智能辅助支持、基于lrs的学习分析和面向教师的决策支持的可行性提供了初步的实证支持,同时保留了教育者的监督和教学责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书