Asymmetric Synaptic Plasticity Provides an Attractor-Based Mechanism for θ-γ Coupling and Pathological Synchronization.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Print Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0111-26.2026
Hongjie Bi, Bojun Wang, Hongsheng Deng, Changhai Tian, Xiyun Zhang
{"title":"Asymmetric Synaptic Plasticity Provides an Attractor-Based Mechanism for <i>θ</i>-<i>γ</i> Coupling and Pathological Synchronization.","authors":"Hongjie Bi, Bojun Wang, Hongsheng Deng, Changhai Tian, Xiyun Zhang","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0111-26.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Short-term synaptic plasticity continuously reshapes the balance between excitation and inhibition, yet most population models assume that excitatory and inhibitory synapses share similar short-term dynamics. Experimental studies, however, have shown that inhibitory synapses typically exhibit stronger short-term depression (STD) than recurrent excitatory connections. Here, we investigate how this cell-type-specific asymmetry influences cortical population dynamics by combining a neural mass model with large-scale spiking network simulations. We show that asymmetric inhibitory STD qualitatively changes the attractor structure of the network, generating a bistable regime that is absent under the conventional symmetric assumption. Within this regime, endogenous finite-size fluctuations drive spontaneous transitions between a stable focus and a stable limit cycle, giving rise to metastable dynamics. The asymmetric paradigm exhibits <i>θ</i>-<i>γ</i> phase-amplitude coupling of strength similar to that of the symmetric one, although it arises from fundamentally different dynamics. We further show that slowing synaptic recovery progressively eliminates this bistable regime, leading to persistent hypersynchronous oscillations and reduced phase-amplitude coupling. These results identify asymmetric inhibitory STD as a mechanism that reshapes cortical attractor dynamics and suggest how altered synaptic recovery may contribute to pathological network activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0111-26.2026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short-term synaptic plasticity continuously reshapes the balance between excitation and inhibition, yet most population models assume that excitatory and inhibitory synapses share similar short-term dynamics. Experimental studies, however, have shown that inhibitory synapses typically exhibit stronger short-term depression (STD) than recurrent excitatory connections. Here, we investigate how this cell-type-specific asymmetry influences cortical population dynamics by combining a neural mass model with large-scale spiking network simulations. We show that asymmetric inhibitory STD qualitatively changes the attractor structure of the network, generating a bistable regime that is absent under the conventional symmetric assumption. Within this regime, endogenous finite-size fluctuations drive spontaneous transitions between a stable focus and a stable limit cycle, giving rise to metastable dynamics. The asymmetric paradigm exhibits θ-γ phase-amplitude coupling of strength similar to that of the symmetric one, although it arises from fundamentally different dynamics. We further show that slowing synaptic recovery progressively eliminates this bistable regime, leading to persistent hypersynchronous oscillations and reduced phase-amplitude coupling. These results identify asymmetric inhibitory STD as a mechanism that reshapes cortical attractor dynamics and suggest how altered synaptic recovery may contribute to pathological network activity.

不对称突触可塑性为θ - γ耦合和病理同步提供了一种基于吸引子的机制。
短期突触可塑性(STP)不断重塑兴奋和抑制之间的平衡,然而大多数种群模型假设兴奋性和抑制性突触具有相似的短期动态。然而,实验研究表明,抑制性突触通常比周期性兴奋性突触表现出更强的短期抑制(STD)。在这里,我们通过结合神经质量模型和大规模峰值网络模拟来研究这种细胞类型特异性不对称如何影响皮质种群动态。我们证明了不对称抑制STD定性地改变了网络的吸引子结构,产生了在传统对称假设下不存在的双稳态状态。在这种状态下,内源性有限大小的波动驱动稳定焦点和稳定极限环之间的自发转换,从而产生亚稳态动力学。非对称范式表现出与对称范式强度相似的θ - γ相幅耦合,尽管它来自根本不同的动力学。我们进一步表明,缓慢的突触恢复逐渐消除了这种双稳态状态,导致持续的超同步振荡和相幅耦合降低。这些结果表明,不对称抑制性STD是一种重塑皮层吸引子动力学的机制,并表明突触恢复的改变可能有助于病理网络活动。实验研究表明,抑制性突触通常比兴奋性突触经历更强的短期抑制,但这种不对称对皮层动力学的影响尚不清楚。结合神经质量模型和峰值网络模拟,我们发现不对称抑制性抑郁改变了皮层网络的吸引子结构,创造了一个支持波动驱动的亚稳态活动的双稳态机制。非对称范式表现出与对称范式相似的θ - γ相幅耦合强度,但具有不同的动力起源。我们的研究结果表明,细胞类型特异性突触动力学不仅影响网络活动的强度,而且影响其潜在的动态组织,为灵活的皮层加工和病理同步的出现提供了可能的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书