Evolution of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Contemporary Advances and Future Directions.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Gregory Glauser, Shaarada Srivatsa, Bilal B Butt, Mohamed Macki, Christoph P Hofstetter, Osama N Kashlan
{"title":"Evolution of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Contemporary Advances and Future Directions.","authors":"Gregory Glauser, Shaarada Srivatsa, Bilal B Butt, Mohamed Macki, Christoph P Hofstetter, Osama N Kashlan","doi":"10.1007/s12178-026-10058-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Endoscopic spine surgery has evolved from non-visualized percutaneous discectomy only, into a comprehensive minimally invasive surgical platform with expanding indications across cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pathology. This review examines endoscopic spine surgery's historical evolution, summarizes recent advances in technology and clinical application, and evaluates current evidence regarding outcomes, complications, and future directions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Endoscopic spine surgery demonstrates clinical outcomes comparable to traditional open and minimally invasive approaches for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Advantages of endoscopic approach include reduced tissue disruption, decreased blood loss, shorter hospitalization, expedited recovery, and faster return to work. Emerging applications include endoscopic-assisted fusion procedures, outpatient spine surgery pathways, and revision decompression techniques. Recent meta-analyses additionally suggest comparable outcomes between uniportal and biportal approaches, although differences in visualization, ergonomics, and learning curves remain areas of ongoing investigation. Current data supports the safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery in appropriately selected patients, particularly for lumbar decompression procedures. Barriers including steep learning curves, limited formalized training pathways, equipment costs, reimbursement challenges, and the need for long-term comparative outcomes data continue to limit widespread adoption. Future integration of robotics, artificial intelligence, navigation technologies, and biologic augmentation may further expand the role of endoscopic spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10058-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Endoscopic spine surgery has evolved from non-visualized percutaneous discectomy only, into a comprehensive minimally invasive surgical platform with expanding indications across cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pathology. This review examines endoscopic spine surgery's historical evolution, summarizes recent advances in technology and clinical application, and evaluates current evidence regarding outcomes, complications, and future directions.

Recent findings: Endoscopic spine surgery demonstrates clinical outcomes comparable to traditional open and minimally invasive approaches for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Advantages of endoscopic approach include reduced tissue disruption, decreased blood loss, shorter hospitalization, expedited recovery, and faster return to work. Emerging applications include endoscopic-assisted fusion procedures, outpatient spine surgery pathways, and revision decompression techniques. Recent meta-analyses additionally suggest comparable outcomes between uniportal and biportal approaches, although differences in visualization, ergonomics, and learning curves remain areas of ongoing investigation. Current data supports the safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery in appropriately selected patients, particularly for lumbar decompression procedures. Barriers including steep learning curves, limited formalized training pathways, equipment costs, reimbursement challenges, and the need for long-term comparative outcomes data continue to limit widespread adoption. Future integration of robotics, artificial intelligence, navigation technologies, and biologic augmentation may further expand the role of endoscopic spine surgery.

内窥镜脊柱手术的发展:当代进展和未来方向。
回顾目的:内窥镜脊柱手术已经从单纯的非可视化经皮椎间盘切除术发展成为一个综合的微创手术平台,其适应症扩展到颈椎、胸椎和腰椎。本文回顾了内窥镜脊柱手术的历史演变,总结了技术和临床应用的最新进展,并评估了有关结果、并发症和未来发展方向的现有证据。近期研究发现:内窥镜脊柱手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症和椎管狭窄的临床效果与传统的开放和微创入路相当。内窥镜入路的优点包括减少组织破坏、减少失血、缩短住院时间、加快恢复和更快重返工作岗位。新兴的应用包括内窥镜辅助的融合手术、门诊脊柱手术路径和翻修减压技术。最近的荟萃分析也表明单门户和双门户方法的结果相似,尽管在可视化、人体工程学和学习曲线方面的差异仍在研究中。目前的数据支持内镜手术在适当选择的患者中的安全性和有效性,特别是腰椎减压手术。陡峭的学习曲线、有限的正式培训途径、设备成本、报销挑战以及对长期比较结果数据的需求等障碍继续限制着该技术的广泛采用。未来机器人、人工智能、导航技术和生物增强技术的融合可能会进一步扩大内窥镜脊柱手术的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书