Preferred practice patterns survey of secondary intraocular lens implantation in Spain.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
María Victoria De Rojas Silva, Javier Mendicute, Alfredo García-Layana, Juan Manuel Cubero Parra, Sergio Recalde
{"title":"Preferred practice patterns survey of secondary intraocular lens implantation in Spain.","authors":"María Victoria De Rojas Silva, Javier Mendicute, Alfredo García-Layana, Juan Manuel Cubero Parra, Sergio Recalde","doi":"10.1177/11206721261489706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo determine preferred practice patterns for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the absence of capsular support among Spanish ophthalmologists.MethodsCross-sectional study based on an anonymous online survey conducted in Spain. A 31-item questionnaire was distributed to members of the Spanish Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (SECOIR) and the Spanish Retina and Vitreous Society (SERV). It collected data on demographics, preferred surgical techniques, techniques abandoned and reasons for discontinuation, and management of predefined clinical scenarios.ResultsA total of 210 ophthalmologists completed the survey. 29.2% of ophthalmologists younger than 40 years reported no training on this topic during residency. For the management of aphakia without capsular support, 69% preferred delaying secondary IOL placement, mainly to obtain specific instruments or IOLs (83.3%). Complete pars plana vitrectomy was the preferred vitreous management technique (61%). The preferred first-line techniques were retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation (33.3%), T-shaped harpoon scleral-fixated IOL implantation (28.6%), prepupillary iris-claw IOL implantation (15.2%), and the Canabrava technique (8.6%). Angle-supported anterior chamber IOLs and the Yamane technique were each selected by 3.3% of respondents.ConclusionsRetropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation was the preferred first-line option among Spanish ophthalmologists. Despite improved training among younger surgeons, nearly one third of ophthalmologists under 40 years still reported no formal training, suggesting persistent gaps in residency training.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721261489706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261489706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo determine preferred practice patterns for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the absence of capsular support among Spanish ophthalmologists.MethodsCross-sectional study based on an anonymous online survey conducted in Spain. A 31-item questionnaire was distributed to members of the Spanish Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (SECOIR) and the Spanish Retina and Vitreous Society (SERV). It collected data on demographics, preferred surgical techniques, techniques abandoned and reasons for discontinuation, and management of predefined clinical scenarios.ResultsA total of 210 ophthalmologists completed the survey. 29.2% of ophthalmologists younger than 40 years reported no training on this topic during residency. For the management of aphakia without capsular support, 69% preferred delaying secondary IOL placement, mainly to obtain specific instruments or IOLs (83.3%). Complete pars plana vitrectomy was the preferred vitreous management technique (61%). The preferred first-line techniques were retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation (33.3%), T-shaped harpoon scleral-fixated IOL implantation (28.6%), prepupillary iris-claw IOL implantation (15.2%), and the Canabrava technique (8.6%). Angle-supported anterior chamber IOLs and the Yamane technique were each selected by 3.3% of respondents.ConclusionsRetropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation was the preferred first-line option among Spanish ophthalmologists. Despite improved training among younger surgeons, nearly one third of ophthalmologists under 40 years still reported no formal training, suggesting persistent gaps in residency training.

西班牙继发性人工晶状体植入术首选实践模式调查。
目的探讨西班牙眼科医生在无晶状体囊支持的情况下二期人工晶状体植入术的最佳实践模式。方法基于在西班牙进行的匿名在线调查的横断面研究。向西班牙白内障和屈光手术学会(SECOIR)和西班牙视网膜和玻璃体学会(SERV)的成员分发了一份31项问卷。它收集了人口统计数据、首选手术技术、放弃的技术和停止的原因,以及预先确定的临床情况的管理。结果共有210名眼科医生完成调查。29.2%的40岁以下的眼科医生在住院期间没有接受过这方面的培训。对于无晶状体囊支持的无晶状体,69%的人倾向于延迟二次人工晶状体的放置,主要是获得特定的器械或人工晶状体(83.3%)。玻璃体切除术是首选的玻璃体治疗技术(61%)。首选的一线人工晶状体植入术是瞳孔后虹膜-爪式人工晶状体植入术(33.3%)、t形鱼叉巩膜固定人工晶状体植入术(28.6%)、瞳孔前虹膜-爪式人工晶状体植入术(15.2%)和Canabrava技术(8.6%)。3.3%的应答者选择了角度支撑型前房人工晶状体和Yamane技术。结论西班牙眼科医生首选瞳孔后虹膜-爪形人工晶状体植入术。尽管年轻外科医生的培训有所改善,但40岁以下的眼科医生中仍有近三分之一没有接受过正式培训,这表明住院医师培训方面存在持续的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书