Migraine attack prediction using wearable biosensor data.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-25 DOI:10.1177/03331024261492220
Saulius Andruškevičius, Viroslava Kapustynska, Vytautas Abromavičius, Henrik Winther Schytz, Kristina Ryliškienė
{"title":"Migraine attack prediction using wearable biosensor data.","authors":"Saulius Andruškevičius, Viroslava Kapustynska, Vytautas Abromavičius, Henrik Winther Schytz, Kristina Ryliškienė","doi":"10.1177/03331024261492220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMany migraine sufferers report difficulties in managing their attacks, leading to missed workdays, impaired cognitive function and reduced participation in social activities. This challenge underscores the importance of identifying reliable indicators of an impending attack. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting migraine attacks based on continuous, non-invasive monitoring of autonomic nervous system activity.MethodsData from a wrist-worn biosensor device the Empatica EmbracePlus (Empatica Inc., Boston, MA, USA) capturing electrodermal activity, heart rate, skin temperature and metabolic equivalent of task were analysed using machine learning models to detect prodromal autonomic nervous system alterations and predict impending migraine headaches. Personalised models were developed using participant-specific model selection, whereas generalised transferability was assessed using a leave-one-participant-out approach.ResultsData from 27 participants were analysed, with an average monitoring period of 30.8 ± 12.9 days, during which 96 migraine attacks were recorded, corresponding to 3.6 ± 1.0 episodes per individual. Personalised prediction models, each reflecting a participant-specific best-selected configuration, achieved good overall predictive performance, with mean values of 0.82 ± 0.10 for accuracy, 0.75 ± 0.16 for precision, 0.72 ± 0.12 for recall and 0.73 ± 0.12 for the F1-score. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84 ± 0.10. Gaussian Naive Bayes was most frequently selected, accounting for 44% of valid participant-specific configurations. Generalised models provided above-chance performance in only one-third of participants.ConclusionsThis study supports the feasibility of migraine attack prediction using continuous physiological data from a wrist-worn biosensor analysed with personalised machine learning approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"46 9","pages":"3331024261492220"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261492220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMany migraine sufferers report difficulties in managing their attacks, leading to missed workdays, impaired cognitive function and reduced participation in social activities. This challenge underscores the importance of identifying reliable indicators of an impending attack. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting migraine attacks based on continuous, non-invasive monitoring of autonomic nervous system activity.MethodsData from a wrist-worn biosensor device the Empatica EmbracePlus (Empatica Inc., Boston, MA, USA) capturing electrodermal activity, heart rate, skin temperature and metabolic equivalent of task were analysed using machine learning models to detect prodromal autonomic nervous system alterations and predict impending migraine headaches. Personalised models were developed using participant-specific model selection, whereas generalised transferability was assessed using a leave-one-participant-out approach.ResultsData from 27 participants were analysed, with an average monitoring period of 30.8 ± 12.9 days, during which 96 migraine attacks were recorded, corresponding to 3.6 ± 1.0 episodes per individual. Personalised prediction models, each reflecting a participant-specific best-selected configuration, achieved good overall predictive performance, with mean values of 0.82 ± 0.10 for accuracy, 0.75 ± 0.16 for precision, 0.72 ± 0.12 for recall and 0.73 ± 0.12 for the F1-score. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84 ± 0.10. Gaussian Naive Bayes was most frequently selected, accounting for 44% of valid participant-specific configurations. Generalised models provided above-chance performance in only one-third of participants.ConclusionsThis study supports the feasibility of migraine attack prediction using continuous physiological data from a wrist-worn biosensor analysed with personalised machine learning approaches.

使用可穿戴生物传感器数据预测偏头痛发作。
背景:许多偏头痛患者报告难以控制发作,导致错过工作日、认知功能受损和减少参与社交活动。这一挑战强调了确定即将发生的攻击的可靠指标的重要性。本研究旨在开发和评估基于自主神经系统活动的连续、无创监测来预测偏头痛发作的机器学习模型。方法利用机器学习模型分析来自Empatica公司(Empatica Inc., Boston, MA, USA)的腕戴式生物传感器设备Empatica embreplus捕获的皮肤电活动、心率、皮肤温度和任务代谢当量的数据,以检测前驱自主神经系统改变并预测即将发生的偏头痛。使用参与者特定的模型选择开发了个性化模型,而使用留一个参与者的方法评估了广义可转移性。结果27名参与者的数据被分析,平均监测期为30.8±12.9天,在此期间记录了96次偏头痛发作,相当于每个人3.6±1.0次发作。个性化的预测模型,每个模型都反映了参与者特定的最佳选择配置,取得了良好的整体预测性能,准确度为0.82±0.10,精度为0.75±0.16,召回率为0.72±0.12,f1得分为0.73±0.12。受试者工作特征曲线下的平均面积为0.84±0.10。高斯朴素贝叶斯是最常被选择的,占有效参与者特定配置的44%。广义模型只在三分之一的参与者中提供了高于机会的表现。结论:本研究支持通过个性化机器学习方法分析腕戴生物传感器的连续生理数据来预测偏头痛发作的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书