Beyond lethal doses: sub-MIC levels of multi-class antibiotics induce species- and isolate-dependent biofilm inhibition in gram-negative pathogens.

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Raghda Elawady, Aliaa G Aboulela, Ahmed N Amer, Abeer A Ghazal, Ahmed Gaballah
{"title":"Beyond lethal doses: sub-MIC levels of multi-class antibiotics induce species- and isolate-dependent biofilm inhibition in gram-negative pathogens.","authors":"Raghda Elawady, Aliaa G Aboulela, Ahmed N Amer, Abeer A Ghazal, Ahmed Gaballah","doi":"10.1186/s12866-026-05620-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biofilm-associated infections remain a major clinical challenge due to their intrinsic tolerance to antimicrobial therapy. Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) of antibiotics are frequently encountered in vivo, particularly at sites of infection and on indwelling medical devices. However, their influence on biofilm formation is controversial, with evidence of both stimulatory and inhibitory effects. Clarifying these responses may reveal novel therapeutic opportunities for managing nosocomial biofilm-related infections. This study aims to investigate the effects of three sub-MIC concentrations (25%, 50%, and 75% of MIC) of five antibiotic classes on biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae using two distinct biofilm quantification methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, the effects of 5 different antimicrobial agents, namely, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and imipenem, at different sub-MIC concentrations (12.5%, 25%, and 50% of MIC) were tested on 5 different clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae. Clinical isolates were exposed to sub-MIC levels of antibiotics in a standardized biofilm assay, with statistical comparisons conducted to determine significant biofilm modulation using crystal violet (CV) staining to measure total biomass accumulation and quantitative PCR (qPCR) to assess qPCR-derived genome-equivalent DNA abundance within biofilms. qPCR detects DNA originating from viable, dead, damaged, or lysed cells, as well as extracellular DNA (eDNA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 75 tested conditions (5 antibiotics × 3 sub-MIC concentrations × 5 clinical isolates per species), sub-inhibitory antibiotic exposure produced pronounced, species- and target-dependent biofilm responsiveness varied by species: P. aeruginosa demonstrated the highest biomass modulation (62% CV significance), E. coli exhibited the greatest molecular responsiveness (55% qPCR significance), and K. pneumoniae showed lower overall modulation (47% CV, 32% qPCR significance). Imipenem exerted the highest biomass suppression in P. aeruginosa (80% CV vs. 13% qPCR inhibition), whereas doxycycline predominantly reduced genome equivalents in P. aeruginosa (73% qPCR vs. 7% CV inhibition). In E. coli, azithromycin produced peak biomass inhibition (73% CV vs. 7% qPCR inhibition), while gentamicin led to molecular suppression (60% qPCR vs. 27% CV inhibition). In K. pneumoniae, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin directed to biomass inhibition (both 40% CV), while azithromycin produced the highest qPCR reduction (33% qPCR). Bidirectional modulation was widespread across drug classes. Azithromycin acted as a primary inducer in P. aeruginosa (80% CV, 67% qPCR induction), while imipenem shifted from a biomass inhibitor in P. aeruginosa (80% CV inhibition) to a primary inducer in K. pneumoniae (47% CV, 60% qPCR induction). Unidirectional responses were drug- and method-specific, such as imipenem in P. aeruginosa CV (80% inhibition) and doxycycline in P. aeruginosa qPCR (73% inhibition).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that sub-MIC exposure produces heterogeneous, antibiotic-, species-, isolate-, concentration-, and method-dependent biofilm responses that diverge between structural matrix accumulation and genomic abundance. Therefore, our findings highlight that sub-MIC exposures demand a multi-assay diagnostic framework to accurately evaluate biofilm-associated drug responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-026-05620-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biofilm-associated infections remain a major clinical challenge due to their intrinsic tolerance to antimicrobial therapy. Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) of antibiotics are frequently encountered in vivo, particularly at sites of infection and on indwelling medical devices. However, their influence on biofilm formation is controversial, with evidence of both stimulatory and inhibitory effects. Clarifying these responses may reveal novel therapeutic opportunities for managing nosocomial biofilm-related infections. This study aims to investigate the effects of three sub-MIC concentrations (25%, 50%, and 75% of MIC) of five antibiotic classes on biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae using two distinct biofilm quantification methods.

Materials and methods: In this study, the effects of 5 different antimicrobial agents, namely, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and imipenem, at different sub-MIC concentrations (12.5%, 25%, and 50% of MIC) were tested on 5 different clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae. Clinical isolates were exposed to sub-MIC levels of antibiotics in a standardized biofilm assay, with statistical comparisons conducted to determine significant biofilm modulation using crystal violet (CV) staining to measure total biomass accumulation and quantitative PCR (qPCR) to assess qPCR-derived genome-equivalent DNA abundance within biofilms. qPCR detects DNA originating from viable, dead, damaged, or lysed cells, as well as extracellular DNA (eDNA).

Results: Across the 75 tested conditions (5 antibiotics × 3 sub-MIC concentrations × 5 clinical isolates per species), sub-inhibitory antibiotic exposure produced pronounced, species- and target-dependent biofilm responsiveness varied by species: P. aeruginosa demonstrated the highest biomass modulation (62% CV significance), E. coli exhibited the greatest molecular responsiveness (55% qPCR significance), and K. pneumoniae showed lower overall modulation (47% CV, 32% qPCR significance). Imipenem exerted the highest biomass suppression in P. aeruginosa (80% CV vs. 13% qPCR inhibition), whereas doxycycline predominantly reduced genome equivalents in P. aeruginosa (73% qPCR vs. 7% CV inhibition). In E. coli, azithromycin produced peak biomass inhibition (73% CV vs. 7% qPCR inhibition), while gentamicin led to molecular suppression (60% qPCR vs. 27% CV inhibition). In K. pneumoniae, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin directed to biomass inhibition (both 40% CV), while azithromycin produced the highest qPCR reduction (33% qPCR). Bidirectional modulation was widespread across drug classes. Azithromycin acted as a primary inducer in P. aeruginosa (80% CV, 67% qPCR induction), while imipenem shifted from a biomass inhibitor in P. aeruginosa (80% CV inhibition) to a primary inducer in K. pneumoniae (47% CV, 60% qPCR induction). Unidirectional responses were drug- and method-specific, such as imipenem in P. aeruginosa CV (80% inhibition) and doxycycline in P. aeruginosa qPCR (73% inhibition).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that sub-MIC exposure produces heterogeneous, antibiotic-, species-, isolate-, concentration-, and method-dependent biofilm responses that diverge between structural matrix accumulation and genomic abundance. Therefore, our findings highlight that sub-MIC exposures demand a multi-assay diagnostic framework to accurately evaluate biofilm-associated drug responses.

超过致死剂量:亚mic水平的多类抗生素在革兰氏阴性病原体中诱导物种和分离依赖的生物膜抑制。
背景:生物膜相关性感染由于其对抗菌药物的内在耐受性仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。抗生素的亚最低抑制浓度(sub- mic)经常在体内遇到,特别是在感染部位和留置医疗器械上。然而,它们对生物膜形成的影响是有争议的,有证据表明它们既有刺激作用,也有抑制作用。澄清这些反应可能为管理院内生物膜相关感染提供新的治疗机会。本研究旨在通过两种不同的生物膜定量方法,研究五种抗生素类别的三种亚MIC浓度(MIC的25%、50%和75%)对铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜形成的影响。材料与方法:本研究采用阿奇霉素、庆大霉素、环丙沙星、多西环素、亚胺培南5种不同亚MIC浓度(MIC的12.5%、25%、50%)的抗菌药物对5种不同临床分离的铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌进行了效果试验。临床分离株在标准化生物膜试验中暴露于亚mic水平的抗生素,并进行统计比较,以确定显著的生物膜调节,使用结晶紫(CV)染色测量总生物量积累,并使用定量PCR (qPCR)评估生物膜内qPCR衍生的基因组等效DNA丰度。qPCR检测来自活细胞、死亡细胞、受损细胞或裂解细胞的DNA,以及细胞外DNA (eDNA)。结果:在75种测试条件下(5种抗生素× 3种亚mic浓度×每个物种5株临床分离株),亚抑制抗生素暴露产生明显的,物种和靶标依赖性生物膜反应性因物种而异:铜绿假单胞菌表现出最高的生物量调节(62% CV显著性),大肠杆菌表现出最大的分子反应性(55% qPCR显著性),肺炎克雷伯菌表现出较低的总体调节(47% CV, 32% qPCR显著性)。亚胺培南对铜绿假单胞菌的生物量抑制作用最大(80% CV抑制,13% qPCR抑制),而多西环素主要降低铜绿假单胞菌的基因组等量(73% qPCR抑制,7% CV抑制)。在大肠杆菌中,阿奇霉素产生峰值生物量抑制(73% CV vs 7% qPCR抑制),而庆大霉素导致分子抑制(60% qPCR vs 27% CV抑制)。在肺炎克雷伯菌中,阿奇霉素和环丙沙星导致生物量抑制(均为40% CV),而阿奇霉素产生最高的qPCR降低(33% qPCR)。双向调制在各类药物中广泛存在。阿奇霉素是铜绿假单胞菌的主要诱导剂(80% CV, 67% qPCR诱导),而亚胺培南则从铜绿假单胞菌的生物量抑制剂(80% CV抑制)转变为肺炎克雷伯菌的主要诱导剂(47% CV, 60% qPCR诱导)。单向反应是药物和方法特异性的,如亚胺培南对铜绿假单胞菌CV(80%的抑制)和多西环素对铜绿假单胞菌qPCR(73%的抑制)。结论:本研究表明,亚mic暴露产生异质、抗生素、物种、分离物、浓度和方法依赖的生物膜反应,这些反应在结构基质积累和基因组丰度之间存在差异。因此,我们的研究结果强调,亚mic暴露需要一个多检测诊断框架来准确评估生物膜相关的药物反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书