Does detection of active initial caries lesions in primary teeth improve clinical outcomes? CARDEC-02 randomized controlled trial of diagnostic-treatment strategies guided by different caries thresholds.
Mariana Minatel Braga, Isabela Floriano, Raiza Dias Freitas, Elizabeth Souza Rocha, Tamara Kerber Tedesco, Gabriela Manco Machado, Renata Antonangelo Gomes, Thais Gomes Machado, Laura Regina Antunes Pontes, José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Fausto Medeiros Mendes
{"title":"Does detection of active initial caries lesions in primary teeth improve clinical outcomes? CARDEC-02 randomized controlled trial of diagnostic-treatment strategies guided by different caries thresholds.","authors":"Mariana Minatel Braga, Isabela Floriano, Raiza Dias Freitas, Elizabeth Souza Rocha, Tamara Kerber Tedesco, Gabriela Manco Machado, Renata Antonangelo Gomes, Thais Gomes Machado, Laura Regina Antunes Pontes, José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Fausto Medeiros Mendes","doi":"10.1159/cre/abuag011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of caries lesions has been encouraged to prevent their progression. However, because the progression rate is relatively low, detecting initial lesions in the caries diagnosis strategy may be considered overdiagnosis, since one can expend additional unnecessary treatment with no relevant benefits for children. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact on children's clinical outcomes of guiding dental treatment based on detecting active initial caries lesions versus ignoring initial caries lesions when assessing dental surfaces in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled diagnostic-treatment trial was designed with 3- to 6-year-old participants and a 2-year follow-up. Caries management interventions were defined based on two different diagnostic thresholds (diagnostic-treatment strategies) considering all caries lesions (including active initial caries) (ALL) or only advanced lesions (ADV). The primary outcome was the number of surfaces needing new operative interventions after two years. Secondary outcomes comprised the type of treatment performed at baseline, the number of new caries lesions after follow-up, the need for restoration replacement, endodontic treatment, or tooth extraction, and oral-health-related quality of life and parental satisfaction with the treatment. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted, and negative binomial regression was used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 260 participants included, 222 were followed up (14.6% attrition rate). No difference was observed between groups for the primary outcome (p=0.827). For the secondary outcomes, children allocated to the ALL group had more non-operative procedures and a higher number of sessions with professional fluoride application. For other secondary outcomes, the groups did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Detecting active initial caries lesions and guiding dental treatment focused on these lesions does not decrease the new operative interventions in primary teeth compared to when these initial lesions are ignored.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02473107. Registered June 16, 2015.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/cre/abuag011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Early detection of caries lesions has been encouraged to prevent their progression. However, because the progression rate is relatively low, detecting initial lesions in the caries diagnosis strategy may be considered overdiagnosis, since one can expend additional unnecessary treatment with no relevant benefits for children. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact on children's clinical outcomes of guiding dental treatment based on detecting active initial caries lesions versus ignoring initial caries lesions when assessing dental surfaces in primary teeth.
Methods: A randomized controlled diagnostic-treatment trial was designed with 3- to 6-year-old participants and a 2-year follow-up. Caries management interventions were defined based on two different diagnostic thresholds (diagnostic-treatment strategies) considering all caries lesions (including active initial caries) (ALL) or only advanced lesions (ADV). The primary outcome was the number of surfaces needing new operative interventions after two years. Secondary outcomes comprised the type of treatment performed at baseline, the number of new caries lesions after follow-up, the need for restoration replacement, endodontic treatment, or tooth extraction, and oral-health-related quality of life and parental satisfaction with the treatment. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted, and negative binomial regression was used for comparisons.
Results: Of the 260 participants included, 222 were followed up (14.6% attrition rate). No difference was observed between groups for the primary outcome (p=0.827). For the secondary outcomes, children allocated to the ALL group had more non-operative procedures and a higher number of sessions with professional fluoride application. For other secondary outcomes, the groups did not differ.
Conclusion: Detecting active initial caries lesions and guiding dental treatment focused on these lesions does not decrease the new operative interventions in primary teeth compared to when these initial lesions are ignored.
Trial registration: NCT02473107. Registered June 16, 2015.
期刊介绍：
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
