Multidimensional Quality Evaluation of Imaging Performance for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xiaoxue Bai, Li Zhao, Pan Zhou, Ge Bai, Longxin Xiao, Jianan Chen, Ye Yu, Weicheng Yan, Yang Xu
{"title":"Multidimensional Quality Evaluation of Imaging Performance for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.","authors":"Xiaoxue Bai, Li Zhao, Pan Zhou, Ge Bai, Longxin Xiao, Jianan Chen, Ye Yu, Weicheng Yan, Yang Xu","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering13091094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Core parameters of the Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Computed Tomography System (MUCTS), such as spatial resolution, slice thickness, and three-dimensional reconstruction volume error, directly determine imaging performance and clinical diagnostic accuracy. To objectively and systematically assess the imaging quality and diagnostic reliability of this device, this study took the MUCTS developed by Weishi Medical Imaging Co., Ltd., as the test object. Multidimensional performance tests were carried out using standard ultrasound phantoms and polyurethane-based tissue-mimicking musculoskeletal phantoms. Under unified imaging and reconstruction parameters, key indicators, including effective detection radius, axial resolution, lateral resolution, imaging dead zone, slice thickness, geometric position accuracy, and three-dimensional reconstruction volume error, were quantitatively measured, and compliance verification was performed against product technical specifications. The test results demonstrated that the nominal center frequency was 3 MHz with a measured frequency deviation of 3%, and the effective detection radius reached 90 mm. Within the valid imaging range, the axial resolution was 0.5 mm, lateral resolution was 1 mm, imaging dead zone was 1 mm, and slice thickness was 3.2 mm. The relative error of geometric position accuracy was 3%, the relative deviations in perimeter and area measurements were both -1%, and the relative deviation in three-dimensional reconstructed volume was -8%. All indicators satisfied product technical requirements. Qualitative comparative experiments on tissue-mimicking phantoms confirmed that the system could reproduce multiscale and multi-contrast musculoskeletal anatomical features, and the acquired images showed favorable consistency with designed phantom targets. In conclusion, this musculoskeletal ultrasound tomographic system exhibits stable imaging performance and credible quantitative measurements, and can meet clinical and research demands for tomographic imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction of human musculoskeletal tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13603685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13091094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Core parameters of the Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Computed Tomography System (MUCTS), such as spatial resolution, slice thickness, and three-dimensional reconstruction volume error, directly determine imaging performance and clinical diagnostic accuracy. To objectively and systematically assess the imaging quality and diagnostic reliability of this device, this study took the MUCTS developed by Weishi Medical Imaging Co., Ltd., as the test object. Multidimensional performance tests were carried out using standard ultrasound phantoms and polyurethane-based tissue-mimicking musculoskeletal phantoms. Under unified imaging and reconstruction parameters, key indicators, including effective detection radius, axial resolution, lateral resolution, imaging dead zone, slice thickness, geometric position accuracy, and three-dimensional reconstruction volume error, were quantitatively measured, and compliance verification was performed against product technical specifications. The test results demonstrated that the nominal center frequency was 3 MHz with a measured frequency deviation of 3%, and the effective detection radius reached 90 mm. Within the valid imaging range, the axial resolution was 0.5 mm, lateral resolution was 1 mm, imaging dead zone was 1 mm, and slice thickness was 3.2 mm. The relative error of geometric position accuracy was 3%, the relative deviations in perimeter and area measurements were both -1%, and the relative deviation in three-dimensional reconstructed volume was -8%. All indicators satisfied product technical requirements. Qualitative comparative experiments on tissue-mimicking phantoms confirmed that the system could reproduce multiscale and multi-contrast musculoskeletal anatomical features, and the acquired images showed favorable consistency with designed phantom targets. In conclusion, this musculoskeletal ultrasound tomographic system exhibits stable imaging performance and credible quantitative measurements, and can meet clinical and research demands for tomographic imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction of human musculoskeletal tissues.

肌肉骨骼超声计算机断层成像系统成像性能的多维质量评价。
肌肉骨骼超声计算机断层扫描系统(MUCTS)的核心参数,如空间分辨率、切片厚度、三维重建体积误差等,直接决定了成像性能和临床诊断的准确性。为了客观、系统地评价该设备的成像质量和诊断可靠性,本研究以伟视医学影像有限公司研制的MUCTS为试验对象。多维性能测试使用标准超声模型和基于聚氨酯的组织模拟肌肉骨骼模型进行。在统一的成像和重建参数下,定量测量有效检测半径、轴向分辨率、横向分辨率、成像死区、切片厚度、几何位置精度、三维重建体积误差等关键指标,并根据产品技术规范进行符合性验证。试验结果表明,标称中心频率为3 MHz,测量频率偏差为3%,有效检测半径达到90 mm。在有效成像范围内,轴向分辨率0.5 mm,横向分辨率1 mm,成像死区1 mm,切片厚度3.2 mm。几何位置精度的相对误差为3%,周长和面积测量的相对误差均为-1%,三维重建体积的相对误差为-8%。各项指标均满足产品技术要求。组织模拟模型的定性对比实验证实,该系统能够再现多尺度、多对比度的肌肉骨骼解剖特征,获得的图像与设计的模拟目标具有良好的一致性。综上所述,该肌肉骨骼超声层析成像系统成像性能稳定,定量测量可靠,能够满足人体肌肉骨骼组织层析成像和三维重建的临床和研究需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书