Perfectionism Dimensions and Longitudinal Depressive Symptom Profiles in Adolescents: Distinguishing Evaluative Self-Criticism from Personal Standards.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Meng Yuan, Yuheng Huang
{"title":"Perfectionism Dimensions and Longitudinal Depressive Symptom Profiles in Adolescents: Distinguishing Evaluative Self-Criticism from Personal Standards.","authors":"Meng Yuan, Yuheng Huang","doi":"10.3390/bs16091678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perfectionism is multidimensional, yet it remains unclear whether evaluative self-criticism and high personal standards differentially identify adolescents with unfavorable depressive symptom profiles. Using data from a baseline sample of 1150 adolescents aged 14 to 19 years and six monthly follow-up assessments, a three-class quadratic growth mixture model identified low-stable, high-decreasing, and increasing/high-escalating profiles among 1129 trajectory-eligible participants. Three-Step Approach(R3STEP) models entered self-critical perfectionism, personal standards perfectionism, age, sex, rural/urban source, and highest parental education simultaneously; a sensitivity model additionally included baseline depressive symptoms. Self-critical perfectionism was associated with both non-low-stable profiles and remained significant after baseline symptom adjustment, although estimates were attenuated. Personal standards perfectionism showed no consistent association. Direct coefficient contrasts indicated stronger self-critical than personal-standards effects for both non-low-stable profiles in the primary model, but these between-predictor differences were no longer significant after baseline Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) adjustment. A targeted sensitivity analysis excluding parental education as a covariate yielded the same substantive pattern for self-critical perfectionism. The findings provide a person-centered extension of multidimensional perfectionism-depression research while also indicating that the two Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale(DPSCA) subscales showed only modest internal consistency and imperfect absolute factorial fit in this sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13603892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perfectionism is multidimensional, yet it remains unclear whether evaluative self-criticism and high personal standards differentially identify adolescents with unfavorable depressive symptom profiles. Using data from a baseline sample of 1150 adolescents aged 14 to 19 years and six monthly follow-up assessments, a three-class quadratic growth mixture model identified low-stable, high-decreasing, and increasing/high-escalating profiles among 1129 trajectory-eligible participants. Three-Step Approach(R3STEP) models entered self-critical perfectionism, personal standards perfectionism, age, sex, rural/urban source, and highest parental education simultaneously; a sensitivity model additionally included baseline depressive symptoms. Self-critical perfectionism was associated with both non-low-stable profiles and remained significant after baseline symptom adjustment, although estimates were attenuated. Personal standards perfectionism showed no consistent association. Direct coefficient contrasts indicated stronger self-critical than personal-standards effects for both non-low-stable profiles in the primary model, but these between-predictor differences were no longer significant after baseline Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) adjustment. A targeted sensitivity analysis excluding parental education as a covariate yielded the same substantive pattern for self-critical perfectionism. The findings provide a person-centered extension of multidimensional perfectionism-depression research while also indicating that the two Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale(DPSCA) subscales showed only modest internal consistency and imperfect absolute factorial fit in this sample.

完美主义维度与青少年抑郁症状的纵向特征:评价性自我批评与个人标准的区别。
完美主义是多维度的,但目前尚不清楚评估性自我批评和高个人标准是否会对不良抑郁症状的青少年产生不同的影响。利用来自1150名14至19岁青少年的基线样本数据和6个月的随访评估,一个三级二次增长混合模型确定了1129名符合轨迹条件的参与者的低稳定、高下降和增加/高上升特征。三步法(R3STEP)模型同时进入自我批判完美主义、个人标准完美主义、年龄、性别、农村/城市来源和父母最高教育程度;敏感性模型还包括基线抑郁症状。自我批评型完美主义与两种非低稳定型特征相关,并且在基线症状调整后仍然显著,尽管估计值有所减弱。个人标准和完美主义之间没有一致的联系。直接系数对比表明,在初级模型中,自我批评比个人标准对两种非低稳定谱的影响更强,但在基线流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)调整后,这些预测因子之间的差异不再显著。一项排除父母教育作为协变量的针对性敏感性分析得出了自我批判完美主义的相同实质模式。研究结果为多维完美主义抑郁研究提供了一个以人为中心的延伸,同时也表明两个儿童和青少年完美主义量表(DPSCA)的子量表在这个样本中只有适度的内部一致性和不完美的绝对因子拟合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书