From Tool to Social Actor: A Systematic Review of the Psychological Mechanisms Through Which Conversational AI Reshapes the Employee Experience.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Li Liu, Ruijuan Zhang, Xin Su
{"title":"From Tool to Social Actor: A Systematic Review of the Psychological Mechanisms Through Which Conversational AI Reshapes the Employee Experience.","authors":"Li Liu, Ruijuan Zhang, Xin Su","doi":"10.3390/bs16091704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid workplace diffusion of conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) introduces a new social actor, yet existing reviews often neglect the intrapsychic processes through which employees construe these systems. This systematic review synthesizes the emerging psychological mechanisms suggested by the literature through which CAI reshapes the employee experience. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Web of Science database (up to February 2026) and analyzed 84 SSCI-indexed studies based on the sociotechnical systems theory, the Computers as Social Actors paradigm, and the Job Demands-Resources model; the corpus quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings reveal that while instrumental framing remains dominant, a meaningful theoretical turn has emerged among a minority of studies, where conversational artificial intelligence is increasingly conceptualized as a partner or supervisor fundamentally driven by anthropomorphic cues. The synthesis identifies a double-edged reshaping of work: cognitively, human intelligence augmentation competes with skill threat; emotionally, constant support contrasts with social fabric erosion; and career-wise, inclusion coexists with work alienation and generative AI loafing. These dimensions are psychologically coupled, with patterns indicating that cognitive threats co-occur with emotional anxiety and moral expediency. While limited by cross-sectional primary evidence, the review provides an integrated conceptual model illustrating proposed conceptual pathways that connect multi-layered antecedents to employee outcomes, which could be adopted to guide future longitudinal validation. By shifting the focus from productivity to psychological experience, this study offers theoretical foundations for human-AI collaboration and outlines a future research agenda on trust dynamics and algorithmic fairness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13603245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid workplace diffusion of conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) introduces a new social actor, yet existing reviews often neglect the intrapsychic processes through which employees construe these systems. This systematic review synthesizes the emerging psychological mechanisms suggested by the literature through which CAI reshapes the employee experience. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Web of Science database (up to February 2026) and analyzed 84 SSCI-indexed studies based on the sociotechnical systems theory, the Computers as Social Actors paradigm, and the Job Demands-Resources model; the corpus quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings reveal that while instrumental framing remains dominant, a meaningful theoretical turn has emerged among a minority of studies, where conversational artificial intelligence is increasingly conceptualized as a partner or supervisor fundamentally driven by anthropomorphic cues. The synthesis identifies a double-edged reshaping of work: cognitively, human intelligence augmentation competes with skill threat; emotionally, constant support contrasts with social fabric erosion; and career-wise, inclusion coexists with work alienation and generative AI loafing. These dimensions are psychologically coupled, with patterns indicating that cognitive threats co-occur with emotional anxiety and moral expediency. While limited by cross-sectional primary evidence, the review provides an integrated conceptual model illustrating proposed conceptual pathways that connect multi-layered antecedents to employee outcomes, which could be adopted to guide future longitudinal validation. By shifting the focus from productivity to psychological experience, this study offers theoretical foundations for human-AI collaboration and outlines a future research agenda on trust dynamics and algorithmic fairness.

从工具到社会行动者:对会话人工智能重塑员工体验的心理机制的系统回顾。
会话人工智能(CAI)在工作场所的快速传播引入了一个新的社会参与者,然而现有的评论往往忽视了员工构建这些系统的内在心理过程。本系统综述综合了文献中提出的CAI重塑员工体验的新兴心理机制。根据PRISMA的指导方针,我们检索了Web of Science数据库(截至2026年2月),并基于社会技术系统理论、计算机作为社会行动者范式和工作需求-资源模型分析了84项ssci索引的研究;使用混合方法评价工具对语料库质量进行评价。研究结果表明,虽然工具框架仍然占主导地位,但在少数研究中出现了一个有意义的理论转向,其中会话人工智能越来越多地被概念化为从根本上由拟人化线索驱动的合作伙伴或主管。这一综合发现了工作的双刃剑重塑:在认知方面,人类智力的增强与技能威胁竞争;情感上,持续的支持与社会结构的侵蚀形成鲜明对比;在职业方面,包容与工作疏离和生成式人工智能闲逛共存。这些维度在心理上是相互关联的,其模式表明认知威胁与情绪焦虑和道德权宜之计同时发生。虽然受横向主要证据的限制,但该综述提供了一个综合的概念模型,说明了将多层前因与员工结果联系起来的概念路径,该模型可以用于指导未来的纵向验证。通过将重点从生产力转移到心理体验,本研究为人类-人工智能协作提供了理论基础,并概述了信任动态和算法公平性的未来研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书