Generative Artificial Intelligence Use and Learning Engagement Among Medical Undergraduates: Statistical Indirect and Configurational Associations Involving Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qian He, Guanglei Chang, Ning Su, Yingying Yang, Jun Ma
{"title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence Use and Learning Engagement Among Medical Undergraduates: Statistical Indirect and Configurational Associations Involving Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction.","authors":"Qian He, Guanglei Chang, Ning Su, Yingying Yang, Jun Ma","doi":"10.3390/bs16091694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) becomes increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education, its relationship with students' learning engagement warrants further investigation. Guided by self-determination theory, this cross-sectional questionnaire study surveyed 498 medical undergraduates at a medical university in China and used structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine average associations and configurational patterns among GAI use, basic psychological need satisfaction, and learning engagement. SEM results showed that GAI use was positively but weakly associated with basic psychological need satisfaction, whereas basic psychological need satisfaction was more strongly associated with learning engagement. The direct association between GAI use and learning engagement was not statistically significant, while the statistical indirect association through basic psychological need satisfaction was significant but small. The fsQCA results showed that high GAI use was not a necessary condition for high learning engagement. The configuration combining autonomy, competence, and relatedness need satisfaction had the highest coverage and showed relatively stable results across threshold adjustments, with competence need satisfaction as a core condition. These findings suggest that the educational relevance of GAI use may be better understood in relation to students' psychological need conditions than to use frequency alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13603777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) becomes increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education, its relationship with students' learning engagement warrants further investigation. Guided by self-determination theory, this cross-sectional questionnaire study surveyed 498 medical undergraduates at a medical university in China and used structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine average associations and configurational patterns among GAI use, basic psychological need satisfaction, and learning engagement. SEM results showed that GAI use was positively but weakly associated with basic psychological need satisfaction, whereas basic psychological need satisfaction was more strongly associated with learning engagement. The direct association between GAI use and learning engagement was not statistically significant, while the statistical indirect association through basic psychological need satisfaction was significant but small. The fsQCA results showed that high GAI use was not a necessary condition for high learning engagement. The configuration combining autonomy, competence, and relatedness need satisfaction had the highest coverage and showed relatively stable results across threshold adjustments, with competence need satisfaction as a core condition. These findings suggest that the educational relevance of GAI use may be better understood in relation to students' psychological need conditions than to use frequency alone.

生成性人工智能的使用与医学本科生的学习投入:涉及基本心理需求满足的统计间接和构型关联
随着生成式人工智能(GAI)越来越多地融入本科医学教育,它与学生学习参与的关系值得进一步研究。本研究以自我决定理论为指导,采用横断面问卷调查方法,对498名中国医科大学的医学本科生进行调查,采用结构方程模型(SEM)和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)分析了GAI使用、基本心理需求满意度和学习投入三者之间的平均关联关系和配置模式。扫描电镜结果显示,GAI使用与基本心理需求满足呈弱正相关,而基本心理需求满足与学习投入呈强相关。GAI使用与学习投入之间的直接关联在统计学上不显著,而通过基本心理需求满足的统计间接关联显著但较小。fsQCA结果显示,高GAI使用并不是高学习投入的必要条件。以胜任力需求满足为核心条件的自主性需求满足、胜任力需求满足和相关性需求满足相结合的配置覆盖范围最高,且在阈值调整中表现出相对稳定的结果。这些发现表明,GAI使用的教育相关性可能与学生的心理需求条件有关,而不是单独使用频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书