Effects of Dance and Rhythmic Physical Activity Interventions on Executive Function and Motor Competence in Children: A Systematic Review and Three-Level Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hao Luo, Lingyun Long, Haozhe Wang, Wenjia Chen
{"title":"Effects of Dance and Rhythmic Physical Activity Interventions on Executive Function and Motor Competence in Children: A Systematic Review and Three-Level Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hao Luo, Lingyun Long, Haozhe Wang, Wenjia Chen","doi":"10.3390/bs16091699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dance and rhythmic physical activity may support motor and cognitive development in children, but the magnitude and consistency of these effects remain uncertain, and individual trials frequently contribute multiple statistically dependent outcomes. Five electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to May 2026. Executive function (EF) and motor competence (MC) were analyzed as separate primary domains using multilevel random-effects models with an estimated sampling variance-covariance structure and trial-clustered CR2 robust inference. Cluster-randomized designs, shared controls, and overlapping reports were explicitly accounted for. Twenty-two reports representing 21 unique trials and 2496 unique children were included. The primary EF model included 34 core-EF effect sizes from seven trials and yielded g = 0.50 (95% CI [-0.04, 1.04], <i>p</i> = 0.063; 95% PI [-1.24, 2.24]). The MC model included 103 effect sizes from 17 trials and showed a positive average effect (g = 0.95, 95% CI [0.39, 1.52], <i>p</i> = 0.003; 95% PI [-1.43, 3.34]). Trial-clustered dose-response models did not identify statistically supported associations for intervention duration, total minutes, weekly frequency, or session duration. Certainty of evidence was very low for EF and low for MC. Dance and rhythmic physical activity may improve motor competence in children on average, although effects vary substantially across settings. Executive-function findings remain preliminary and statistically uncertain. Current evidence does not support causal recommendations for longer interventions or higher total doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13603710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dance and rhythmic physical activity may support motor and cognitive development in children, but the magnitude and consistency of these effects remain uncertain, and individual trials frequently contribute multiple statistically dependent outcomes. Five electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to May 2026. Executive function (EF) and motor competence (MC) were analyzed as separate primary domains using multilevel random-effects models with an estimated sampling variance-covariance structure and trial-clustered CR2 robust inference. Cluster-randomized designs, shared controls, and overlapping reports were explicitly accounted for. Twenty-two reports representing 21 unique trials and 2496 unique children were included. The primary EF model included 34 core-EF effect sizes from seven trials and yielded g = 0.50 (95% CI [-0.04, 1.04], p = 0.063; 95% PI [-1.24, 2.24]). The MC model included 103 effect sizes from 17 trials and showed a positive average effect (g = 0.95, 95% CI [0.39, 1.52], p = 0.003; 95% PI [-1.43, 3.34]). Trial-clustered dose-response models did not identify statistically supported associations for intervention duration, total minutes, weekly frequency, or session duration. Certainty of evidence was very low for EF and low for MC. Dance and rhythmic physical activity may improve motor competence in children on average, although effects vary substantially across settings. Executive-function findings remain preliminary and statistically uncertain. Current evidence does not support causal recommendations for longer interventions or higher total doses.

舞蹈和韵律体育活动干预对儿童执行功能和运动能力的影响:系统回顾和三水平荟萃分析。
舞蹈和有节奏的体育活动可能支持儿童的运动和认知发展,但这些影响的幅度和一致性仍然不确定,个别试验经常产生多个统计依赖的结果。五个电子数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov从成立到2026年5月被检索。执行功能(EF)和运动能力(MC)作为两个独立的主要领域,采用估计抽样方差-协方差结构和试验聚类CR2稳健推理的多水平随机效应模型进行分析。明确考虑了集群随机设计、共享控制和重叠报告。共纳入22份报告,代表21项独特的试验和2496名独特的儿童。主要EF模型包括来自7个试验的34个核心-EF效应量,得出g = 0.50 (95% CI [-0.04, 1.04], p = 0.063; 95% PI[-1.24, 2.24])。MC模型包括来自17个试验的103个效应量,平均效应为正(g = 0.95, 95% CI [0.39, 1.52], p = 0.003; 95% PI[-1.43, 3.34])。试验聚集的剂量反应模型没有确定统计学上支持的干预持续时间、总分钟数、每周频率或疗程持续时间的关联。EF和MC的证据确定性非常低。舞蹈和有节奏的体育活动可以提高儿童的平均运动能力,尽管效果在不同环境下差异很大。执行功能的调查结果仍然是初步的,在统计上还不确定。目前的证据不支持因果建议更长时间的干预或更高的总剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书