Three Strategies to Strengthen Therapist Follow-Through in Therapy Sessions: Examination of Accountability in Clinical Supervision.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Meredith R Boyd, Kimberly D Becker, Alayna L Park, Bruce F Chorpita
{"title":"Three Strategies to Strengthen Therapist Follow-Through in Therapy Sessions: Examination of Accountability in Clinical Supervision.","authors":"Meredith R Boyd, Kimberly D Becker, Alayna L Park, Bruce F Chorpita","doi":"10.1007/s10488-026-01527-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical supervision is a natural opportunity for promoting therapist use of clinical practices supported by research in community mental health services. However, the research on thespecific strategies in supervision that are likely to have a positive impact is limited. One model from the organizational management literature suggests supervision behaviors that promote a sense of accountability-i.e., a perceived expectation to fulfill duties or obligations-may represent key strategies by which supervision promotes use of clinical practices supported by research. The present study aimed to identify the presence of \"accountability strategies\" during clinical supervision and investigate the association between strategies and therapist use of a clinical procedure supported by research during subsequent psychotherapy sessions. Transcripts of supervision sessions (n = 196) and subsequent treatment sessions (n = 196) were observationally coded for supervision accountability strategies and therapist follow-through use of an identified clinical procedure. Binary, multi-level logistic regression models were used to assess the association between accountability strategies during supervision and therapist use of a planned (i.e., \"expected\") practice during the subsequent therapy session. Results indicated explicit selection of the practice the therapist will use in their next treatment session, preparation through activities such as consulting manuals and practicing role plays, and review of how use of the practice went in the past increased the odds of therapist use of the expected practice during the next treatment session. These findings are notable as they demonstrate that supervision can directly influence therapist behavior through three specific strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-026-01527-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical supervision is a natural opportunity for promoting therapist use of clinical practices supported by research in community mental health services. However, the research on thespecific strategies in supervision that are likely to have a positive impact is limited. One model from the organizational management literature suggests supervision behaviors that promote a sense of accountability-i.e., a perceived expectation to fulfill duties or obligations-may represent key strategies by which supervision promotes use of clinical practices supported by research. The present study aimed to identify the presence of "accountability strategies" during clinical supervision and investigate the association between strategies and therapist use of a clinical procedure supported by research during subsequent psychotherapy sessions. Transcripts of supervision sessions (n = 196) and subsequent treatment sessions (n = 196) were observationally coded for supervision accountability strategies and therapist follow-through use of an identified clinical procedure. Binary, multi-level logistic regression models were used to assess the association between accountability strategies during supervision and therapist use of a planned (i.e., "expected") practice during the subsequent therapy session. Results indicated explicit selection of the practice the therapist will use in their next treatment session, preparation through activities such as consulting manuals and practicing role plays, and review of how use of the practice went in the past increased the odds of therapist use of the expected practice during the next treatment session. These findings are notable as they demonstrate that supervision can directly influence therapist behavior through three specific strategies.

在治疗过程中加强治疗师跟进的三种策略:临床监督责任的检验。
临床监督是促进治疗师使用社区精神卫生服务研究支持的临床实践的自然机会。然而,对监管中可能产生积极影响的具体策略的研究却很有限。组织管理文献中的一个模型表明,监督行为可以促进责任感。一种履行职责或义务的感知期望——可能代表了监管促进临床实践使用的关键策略,这些实践是由研究支持的。本研究旨在确定临床监督过程中“问责策略”的存在,并调查策略与治疗师在后续心理治疗过程中使用临床程序之间的关系。监督会议(n = 196)和随后的治疗会议(n = 196)的记录被观察编码,用于监督责任策略和治疗师使用确定的临床程序的随访。使用二元、多层次逻辑回归模型来评估监督期间的问责策略与治疗师在随后的治疗期间使用计划(即“预期”)实践之间的关系。结果表明,明确选择治疗师将在下一次治疗中使用的实践,通过咨询手册和练习角色扮演等活动进行准备,以及回顾过去如何使用实践,增加了治疗师在下一个治疗过程中使用预期实践的几率。这些发现是值得注意的,因为它们证明了监督可以通过三种具体策略直接影响治疗师的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书