{"title":"Cell-Type-Dependent Responses to Oleuropein in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells and HUVECs.","authors":"Derya Okuyan, Ayla Solmaz Avcıkurt","doi":"10.1007/s12013-026-02178-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer progression is associated with dysregulation of cell survival, apoptosis, and cell-cycle control. Oleuropein (OL), a major secoiridoid constituent of olive-derived products, has attracted interest because of its diverse biological activities and potential relevance to cancer research. This study evaluated the cellular and molecular responses to OL in MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells and non-malignant human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Cell viability was assessed following exposure to 10-250 µg/mL OL for 24, 48, and 72 h. OL produced an exposure-time-dependent reduction in MDA-MB-231 cell viability, with estimated IC₅₀ values of >250 µg/mL at 24 h, 117.5 µg/mL at 48 h, and 26.42 µg/mL at 72 h. Based on the overall viability profiles of the two cell models, 100 µg/mL OL was selected for subsequent functional and molecular analyses. At this concentration, MDA-MB-231 viability progressively decreased with prolonged exposure, whereas HUVEC MTT-derived viability values were maintained. OL treatment reduced clonogenic capacity and wound closure in MDA-MB-231 cells, while increased clonogenic capacity and wound closure were observed in HUVECs. qRT-PCR analysis showed increased BAX and CDKN1B and reduced BCL2 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells, whereas HUVECs exhibited reduced BAX and increased BCL2 and CDKN1B expression. Western blot analysis revealed time-dependent changes in BAX, BCL-2, and p27 protein abundance, with partial directional correspondence to the transcriptional findings, particularly at later exposure times. Collectively, these findings indicate that OL elicits distinct cell type-dependent responses in malignant breast cancer and non-malignant endothelial cells. The coordinated viability, clonogenic, wound closure, and molecular expression profiles observed in MDA-MB-231 cells support further investigation of OL in breast cancer models, while the distinct HUVEC response highlights the need to clarify its endothelial and angiogenesis-related effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":510,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-026-02178-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Breast cancer progression is associated with dysregulation of cell survival, apoptosis, and cell-cycle control. Oleuropein (OL), a major secoiridoid constituent of olive-derived products, has attracted interest because of its diverse biological activities and potential relevance to cancer research. This study evaluated the cellular and molecular responses to OL in MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells and non-malignant human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Cell viability was assessed following exposure to 10-250 µg/mL OL for 24, 48, and 72 h. OL produced an exposure-time-dependent reduction in MDA-MB-231 cell viability, with estimated IC₅₀ values of >250 µg/mL at 24 h, 117.5 µg/mL at 48 h, and 26.42 µg/mL at 72 h. Based on the overall viability profiles of the two cell models, 100 µg/mL OL was selected for subsequent functional and molecular analyses. At this concentration, MDA-MB-231 viability progressively decreased with prolonged exposure, whereas HUVEC MTT-derived viability values were maintained. OL treatment reduced clonogenic capacity and wound closure in MDA-MB-231 cells, while increased clonogenic capacity and wound closure were observed in HUVECs. qRT-PCR analysis showed increased BAX and CDKN1B and reduced BCL2 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells, whereas HUVECs exhibited reduced BAX and increased BCL2 and CDKN1B expression. Western blot analysis revealed time-dependent changes in BAX, BCL-2, and p27 protein abundance, with partial directional correspondence to the transcriptional findings, particularly at later exposure times. Collectively, these findings indicate that OL elicits distinct cell type-dependent responses in malignant breast cancer and non-malignant endothelial cells. The coordinated viability, clonogenic, wound closure, and molecular expression profiles observed in MDA-MB-231 cells support further investigation of OL in breast cancer models, while the distinct HUVEC response highlights the need to clarify its endothelial and angiogenesis-related effects.
期刊介绍:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (CBB) aims to publish papers on the nature of the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms underlying the structure, control and function of cellular systems
The reports should be within the framework of modern biochemistry and chemistry, biophysics and cell physiology, physics and engineering, molecular and structural biology. The relationship between molecular structure and function under investigation is emphasized.
Examples of subject areas that CBB publishes are:
· biochemical and biophysical aspects of cell structure and function;
· interactions of cells and their molecular/macromolecular constituents;
· innovative developments in genetic and biomolecular engineering;
· computer-based analysis of tissues, cells, cell networks, organelles, and molecular/macromolecular assemblies;
· photometric, spectroscopic, microscopic, mechanical, and electrical methodologies/techniques in analytical cytology, cytometry and innovative instrument design
For articles that focus on computational aspects, authors should be clear about which docking and molecular dynamics algorithms or software packages are being used as well as details on the system parameterization, simulations conditions etc. In addition, docking calculations (virtual screening, QSAR, etc.) should be validated either by experimental studies or one or more reliable theoretical cross-validation methods.