The law of technological power displacement: Technological non-neutrality and the structural growth of power asymmetry in technological societies

Journal of Government and Economics Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jge.2026.100185
José María Lancho Rodríguez
{"title":"The law of technological power displacement: Technological non-neutrality and the structural growth of power asymmetry in technological societies","authors":"José María Lancho Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2026.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technological change is not neutral with respect to power. This paper derives a conditional law of technological power displacement: technology can shift power from citizens towards a public–corporate regulatory apparatus without deliberate intent or corporate monopoly. A three-equation dynamic model links relational disorder, self-reinforcing regulatory expansion, and regulators’ technical dependence on regulated actors. When technological complexity does not decrease and accumulated regulation facilitates further expansion, the ratio of regulatory expansion to effective democratic restoration rises monotonically. Once expansion outpaces restoration, the imbalance persists under unchanged conditions. Government is central to this process: its regulatory response expands institutional power while technical dependence can erode its capacity to restore democratic balance. A Spanish regulatory index (1978–2024) and an EU-27 panel (2000–2022) provide directional consistency checks. Open standards and technically independent regulators can slow displacement; preserving democratic balance requires changing the structural dynamics that technological deployment sets in motion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319326000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological change is not neutral with respect to power. This paper derives a conditional law of technological power displacement: technology can shift power from citizens towards a public–corporate regulatory apparatus without deliberate intent or corporate monopoly. A three-equation dynamic model links relational disorder, self-reinforcing regulatory expansion, and regulators’ technical dependence on regulated actors. When technological complexity does not decrease and accumulated regulation facilitates further expansion, the ratio of regulatory expansion to effective democratic restoration rises monotonically. Once expansion outpaces restoration, the imbalance persists under unchanged conditions. Government is central to this process: its regulatory response expands institutional power while technical dependence can erode its capacity to restore democratic balance. A Spanish regulatory index (1978–2024) and an EU-27 panel (2000–2022) provide directional consistency checks. Open standards and technically independent regulators can slow displacement; preserving democratic balance requires changing the structural dynamics that technological deployment sets in motion.
技术权力位移规律:技术非中立性与技术社会中权力不对称的结构性增长
就权力而言,技术变革不是中立的。本文导出了技术权力转移的条件规律:技术可以将权力从公民转移到公共-公司监管机构,而无需刻意意图或公司垄断。一个三方程动态模型将关系失序、自我强化的监管扩张和监管者对被监管主体的技术依赖联系起来。当技术复杂性不降低,且累积的监管有利于进一步扩张时,监管扩张与有效民主恢复的比例单调上升。一旦扩张速度超过恢复速度,这种不平衡就会在不变的条件下持续存在。政府是这一进程的核心:其监管反应扩大了机构权力,而技术依赖可能削弱其恢复民主平衡的能力。西班牙监管指数(1978-2024)和欧盟27国面板(2000-2022)提供了方向性一致性检查。开放的标准和技术上独立的监管机构可以减缓取代;维护民主平衡需要改变由技术部署引发的结构动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书