Can artificial intelligence-derived bone mineral density outperform traditional morphometric measurements in opportunistic osteoporosis screening using pelvic radiographs? A multicenter comparative diagnostic study

IF 2.4 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2026.09.001
Chia-Che Lee, Xi-Qian Heng, Hung-Kuan Yen, I-Hsin Chen, Tzu-Hao Tseng, Hong-Da Lu, Hung-Chun Lee, Ruey-Feng Chang, Chen-Yu Wang, Shau-Huai Fu
{"title":"Can artificial intelligence-derived bone mineral density outperform traditional morphometric measurements in opportunistic osteoporosis screening using pelvic radiographs? A multicenter comparative diagnostic study","authors":"Chia-Che Lee,&nbsp;Xi-Qian Heng,&nbsp;Hung-Kuan Yen,&nbsp;I-Hsin Chen,&nbsp;Tzu-Hao Tseng,&nbsp;Hong-Da Lu,&nbsp;Hung-Chun Lee,&nbsp;Ruey-Feng Chang,&nbsp;Chen-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Shau-Huai Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2026.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) model could demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in identifying dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) confirmed osteoporosis, outperform traditional human-read metrics, and deliver substantial clinical net benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 382 patients with hip fractures who had both preoperative pelvic radiographs and postoperative DXA scans. An AI model analyzed the intact contralateral proximal femur to predict both bone mineral density (BMD) values and T-scores. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against DXA-confirmed osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5) and compared with manual cortical thickness index (CTI) and femoral neck width (FNW) measurements using Spearman rank-order correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the DeLong test, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AI model showed a strong correlation with DXA-derived BMD values for both the femoral neck (<em>ρ</em> = 0.76, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.06 g/cm<sup>2</sup>) and the total hip (<em>ρ</em> = 0.69, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.51, MAE = 0.08 g/cm<sup>2</sup>). Correspondingly, the AI-predicted T-scores correlated well with DXA-derived T-scores for the femoral neck (<em>ρ</em> = 0.76, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, MAE = 0.47) and the total hip (<em>ρ</em> = 0.69, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.51, MAE = 0.65). The AI model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–0.93) for the femoral neck and 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.92) for the total hip, both significantly higher than CTI (0.72 [95% CI 0.65–0.79]; P &lt; 0.001) and FNW (0.53 [95% CI 0.44–0.62]; P &lt; 0.001). DCA illustrated that the AI models provided greater clinical net benefit than manual measurements, remaining clinically advantageous up to a threshold probability exceeding 0.90.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning AI offers a superior, automated alternative to traditional manual morphometric measurements for identifying osteoporosis on routine pelvic radiographs in patients with hip fractures, potentially facilitating timely secondary fracture prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 140-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240552552600052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) model could demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in identifying dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) confirmed osteoporosis, outperform traditional human-read metrics, and deliver substantial clinical net benefit.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 382 patients with hip fractures who had both preoperative pelvic radiographs and postoperative DXA scans. An AI model analyzed the intact contralateral proximal femur to predict both bone mineral density (BMD) values and T-scores. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against DXA-confirmed osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5) and compared with manual cortical thickness index (CTI) and femoral neck width (FNW) measurements using Spearman rank-order correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the DeLong test, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The AI model showed a strong correlation with DXA-derived BMD values for both the femoral neck (ρ = 0.76, R2 = 0.55, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.06 g/cm2) and the total hip (ρ = 0.69, R2 = 0.51, MAE = 0.08 g/cm2). Correspondingly, the AI-predicted T-scores correlated well with DXA-derived T-scores for the femoral neck (ρ = 0.76, R2 = 0.55, MAE = 0.47) and the total hip (ρ = 0.69, R2 = 0.51, MAE = 0.65). The AI model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–0.93) for the femoral neck and 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.92) for the total hip, both significantly higher than CTI (0.72 [95% CI 0.65–0.79]; P < 0.001) and FNW (0.53 [95% CI 0.44–0.62]; P < 0.001). DCA illustrated that the AI models provided greater clinical net benefit than manual measurements, remaining clinically advantageous up to a threshold probability exceeding 0.90.

Conclusions

Deep learning AI offers a superior, automated alternative to traditional manual morphometric measurements for identifying osteoporosis on routine pelvic radiographs in patients with hip fractures, potentially facilitating timely secondary fracture prevention.
人工智能衍生的骨密度在盆腔x线片的骨质疏松筛查中是否优于传统的形态测量?一项多中心比较诊断研究
目的探讨人工智能(AI)模型在识别双能x线吸收仪(DXA)确诊的骨质疏松症方面是否具有较高的诊断准确性,优于传统的人工阅读指标,并提供可观的临床净效益。方法回顾性多中心队列研究包括382例髋部骨折患者,术前盆腔x线片和术后DXA扫描。AI模型分析了完整的对侧股骨近端,以预测骨密度(BMD)值和t评分。采用Spearman秩阶相关分析、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、DeLong检验和决策曲线分析(DCA),对dxa确诊的骨质疏松症(t评分≤- 2.5)的诊断性能进行评估,并与人工皮质厚度指数(CTI)和股骨颈宽度(FNW)测量结果进行比较。ResultsThe AI模型显示很强的相关性与DXA-derived股骨颈的骨密度值(ρ = 0.76,R2 = 0.55,平均绝对误差(MAE) =  0.06 g / cm2)和全髋关节(ρ = 0.69,R2 = 0.51,梅 = 0.08 g / cm2)。相应地,AI-predicted t指数相关性与DXA-derived t指数的股骨颈(ρ = 0.76,R2 = 0.55,梅 = 0.47)和全髋关节(ρ = 0.69,R2 = 0.51,梅 = 0.65)。AI模型表现出出色的判别性能,股骨颈的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.88(95%可信区间[CI] 0.83-0.93),全髋关节的AUC为0.87(95%可信区间[CI] 0.82-0.92),均显著高于CTI (0.72 [95% CI 0.65-0.79]; P < 0.001)和FNW (0.53 [95% CI 0.44-0.62]; P < 0.001)。DCA表明,人工智能模型比人工测量提供了更大的临床净效益,在阈值概率超过0.90的情况下,仍然具有临床优势。结论:深度学习人工智能为识别髋部骨折患者骨盆常规x线片骨质疏松症提供了一种优于传统人工形态学测量的自动化替代方法,可能有助于及时预防继发性骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书