Can artificial intelligence-derived bone mineral density outperform traditional morphometric measurements in opportunistic osteoporosis screening using pelvic radiographs? A multicenter comparative diagnostic study
{"title":"Can artificial intelligence-derived bone mineral density outperform traditional morphometric measurements in opportunistic osteoporosis screening using pelvic radiographs? A multicenter comparative diagnostic study","authors":"Chia-Che Lee, Xi-Qian Heng, Hung-Kuan Yen, I-Hsin Chen, Tzu-Hao Tseng, Hong-Da Lu, Hung-Chun Lee, Ruey-Feng Chang, Chen-Yu Wang, Shau-Huai Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2026.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) model could demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in identifying dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) confirmed osteoporosis, outperform traditional human-read metrics, and deliver substantial clinical net benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 382 patients with hip fractures who had both preoperative pelvic radiographs and postoperative DXA scans. An AI model analyzed the intact contralateral proximal femur to predict both bone mineral density (BMD) values and T-scores. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against DXA-confirmed osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5) and compared with manual cortical thickness index (CTI) and femoral neck width (FNW) measurements using Spearman rank-order correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the DeLong test, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AI model showed a strong correlation with DXA-derived BMD values for both the femoral neck (<em>ρ</em> = 0.76, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.06 g/cm<sup>2</sup>) and the total hip (<em>ρ</em> = 0.69, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.51, MAE = 0.08 g/cm<sup>2</sup>). Correspondingly, the AI-predicted T-scores correlated well with DXA-derived T-scores for the femoral neck (<em>ρ</em> = 0.76, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, MAE = 0.47) and the total hip (<em>ρ</em> = 0.69, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.51, MAE = 0.65). The AI model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–0.93) for the femoral neck and 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.92) for the total hip, both significantly higher than CTI (0.72 [95% CI 0.65–0.79]; P < 0.001) and FNW (0.53 [95% CI 0.44–0.62]; P < 0.001). DCA illustrated that the AI models provided greater clinical net benefit than manual measurements, remaining clinically advantageous up to a threshold probability exceeding 0.90.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning AI offers a superior, automated alternative to traditional manual morphometric measurements for identifying osteoporosis on routine pelvic radiographs in patients with hip fractures, potentially facilitating timely secondary fracture prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 140-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240552552600052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) model could demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in identifying dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) confirmed osteoporosis, outperform traditional human-read metrics, and deliver substantial clinical net benefit.
Methods
This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 382 patients with hip fractures who had both preoperative pelvic radiographs and postoperative DXA scans. An AI model analyzed the intact contralateral proximal femur to predict both bone mineral density (BMD) values and T-scores. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against DXA-confirmed osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5) and compared with manual cortical thickness index (CTI) and femoral neck width (FNW) measurements using Spearman rank-order correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the DeLong test, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
The AI model showed a strong correlation with DXA-derived BMD values for both the femoral neck (ρ = 0.76, R2 = 0.55, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.06 g/cm2) and the total hip (ρ = 0.69, R2 = 0.51, MAE = 0.08 g/cm2). Correspondingly, the AI-predicted T-scores correlated well with DXA-derived T-scores for the femoral neck (ρ = 0.76, R2 = 0.55, MAE = 0.47) and the total hip (ρ = 0.69, R2 = 0.51, MAE = 0.65). The AI model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–0.93) for the femoral neck and 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.92) for the total hip, both significantly higher than CTI (0.72 [95% CI 0.65–0.79]; P < 0.001) and FNW (0.53 [95% CI 0.44–0.62]; P < 0.001). DCA illustrated that the AI models provided greater clinical net benefit than manual measurements, remaining clinically advantageous up to a threshold probability exceeding 0.90.
Conclusions
Deep learning AI offers a superior, automated alternative to traditional manual morphometric measurements for identifying osteoporosis on routine pelvic radiographs in patients with hip fractures, potentially facilitating timely secondary fracture prevention.
Osteoporosis and SarcopeniaOrthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology